Part of
Receptive Multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic conceptsEdited by Jan D. ten Thije and Ludger Zeevaert
[Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 6] 2007
► pp. 307–321
Edited by Jan D. ten Thije and Ludger Zeevaert
[Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 6] 2007
► pp. 307–321
14. How can DaFnE and EuroComGerm contribute to the concept of receptive multilingualism? Theoretical and practical considerations
If the goal of receptive multilingualism is to be attained in the European context, new pedagogical concepts must be developed, tested and implemented. The following discussion has as its focus the learning of a new, tertiary and possibly related foreign language (FL), employing two models, Meißner’s Spontaneous Learner Grammar and Hufeisen’s Factor model, as a theoretical framework. It is shown how these modelshave been used to investigate tertiary language learning and how these concepts apply to improving the reception of new FLs. Two projects, DaFnE and EuroComGerm, are considered, both of which aim to help students use their knowledge of a related, previouslylearned FL in order to achieve receptive competencies in a new FL.
Cited by
Cited by 26 other publications
Berthele, Raphael
2021. The Extraordinary Ordinary: Re‐engineering Multilingualism as a Natural Category. Language Learning 71:S1 ► pp. 80 ff. 
Bonnet, Andreas, Larissa Jacob, Annika Schäfer & Torben Schmidt
2018. The acquisition of English as an L3 from a sociocultural point of view. In Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity, 7], ► pp. 255 ff.
Bérubé, Daniel & Stefka H. Marinova-Todd
2014. The effect of sociolinguistic factors and English language proficiency on the development of French as a third language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 17:4 ► pp. 465 ff.
Cenoz, Jasone
2013. The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching 46:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Dzik, Dominika
2020. Intercomprehension – A Mere Dream or a New Way of Learning in Globalised World?. Politeja 16:3(60) ► pp. 155 ff.
Falk, Ylva & Camilla Bardel
2010. The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 48:2-3
Falk, Ylva & Camilla Bardel
2011. Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research 27:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
HAIM, ORLY
2015. Investigating Transfer of Academic Proficiency Among Trilingual Immigrant Students: A Holistic Tri‐Directional Approach. The Modern Language Journal 99:4 ► pp. 696 ff.
Hammarberg, Björn
2018. L3, the tertiary language. In Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity, 7], ► pp. 127 ff.
Haukås, Åsta
2015. A Comparison of L2 and L3 Learners’ Strategy Use in School Settings. The Canadian Modern Language Review 71:4 ► pp. 383 ff.
Haukås, Åsta
2016. Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach. International Journal of Multilingualism 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Henry, Alastair
2014. The motivational effects of crosslinguistic awareness: developing third language pedagogies to address the negative impact of the L2 on the L3 self-concept. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hobbs, Robert Dean
2012. Diverse multilingual researchers contribute language acquisition components to an integrated model of education. International Journal of Multilingualism 9:3 ► pp. 204 ff.
Jessner, Ulrike
2008. Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching 41:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Krulatz, Anna & MaryAnn Christison
2023. The Multilingual Turn in Language Education. In Multilingual Approach to Diversity in Education (MADE), ► pp. 1 ff.
Krulatz, Anna & MaryAnn Christison
2023. Multilingual Approach to Diversity in Education (MADE): An Overview. In Multilingual Approach to Diversity in Education (MADE), ► pp. 25 ff.
Molnár, Krisztina & Tímea Berényi-Nagy
2022. Zum Ertrag der sprachtypologisch-kontrastiven Sprachbeschreibung für den DaF-/DaFnE-Unterricht am Beispiel der Infinitivkonstruktionen. In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog, ► pp. 273 ff.
Osmolovsky, Anna
2009. BOOK REVIEW. International Journal of Multilingualism 6:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Romanowski, Piotr
2024. Language awareness, strategy training and the facilitative role of L2 English: Polish L3 teachers' perceptions of multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism 21:2 ► pp. 728 ff.
Safont Jordà, Maria Pilar
2012. Pragmatic Competence in Multilingual Contexts. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Saturno, Jacopo & Przemysław E. Gębal
2022. Interkomprehensja w nauczaniu języka polskiego jako obcego (jpjo) Słowian wschodnich. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Kształcenie Polonistyczne Cudzoziemców :29 ► pp. 213 ff.
Szubko-Sitarek, Weronika
2014. On the Role of Pre-service Language Teachers’ Beliefs on Multilingual Education in Developing Teacher Training Programs. In Language Learning, Discourse and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 107 ff.
Veivo, Outi, Eija Suomela-Salmi & Juhani Järvikivi
2015. Orthographic bias in L3 lexical knowledge. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Verschik, Anna
2012. Practising receptive multilingualism: Estonian–Finnish communication in Tallinn. International Journal of Bilingualism 16:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Vetter, Eva
2012. Exploiting receptive multilingualism in institutional language learning: The case of Italian in the Austrian secondary school system. International Journal of Bilingualism 16:3 ► pp. 348 ff.
Vikøy, Aasne & Åsta Haukås
2023. Norwegian L1 teachers’ beliefs about a multilingual approach in increasingly diverse classrooms. International Journal of Multilingualism 20:3 ► pp. 912 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.