Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 5
Edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer
[Handbook of Translation Studies 5] 2021
► pp. 67–72

Ergonomics and translation workplaces

| Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Article outline
  • 1.Translation as a situated activity
  • 2.Methodological approaches
  • 3.Implications for translation theory and practice
  • Note
  • References
  • Further essential reading
Published online: 16 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.5.erg1
References (14)
References
Bednárová-Gibová, Klaudia. 2021. “Organizational Ergonomics of Translation as a Powerful Predictor of Translators’ Happiness at Work?” Perspectives 29(3): 391–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadwell, Patrick, Sharon O’Brien, and Carlos S. C. Teixeira. 2018. “Resistance and Accommodation: Factors for the (Non-) Adoption of Machine Translation among Professional Translators.” Perspectives 26 (3): 301–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew. 2009. “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42: 13–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, Andrea Hunziker Heeb, Gary Massey, Ursula Meidert, Silke Neumann, and Heidrun Becker. 2016. “An International Survey of the Ergonomics of Professional Translation.” ILCEA 27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elia 2019. Language Industry Survey –Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry 2019. Brussels: European Language Industry Association. [URL]Google Scholar
Lavault-Olléon, Élisabeth. 2011. “L’ergonomie, nouveau paradigme pour la traductologie.” ILCEA 14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc, Matthieu. 2013. “Translators on Translation Memory (TM). Results of an Ethnographic Study in Three Translation Services and Agencies.” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting 5 (2): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon, Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Marcel Hasler, and Megan Connolly. 2017. “Irritating CAT Tool Features that Matter to Translators.” Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication in Business 56: 145–162. [URL]Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna. 2004. Translationsmanagement. Interkulturelle Fachkommunikation im Informationszeitalter. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Carlos S. C., and Sharon O’Brien. 2017. “Investigating the Cognitive Ergonomic Aspects of Translation Tools in a Workplace Setting.” Translation Spaces 6 (1): 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vink, Peter, and Jussi Kantola. 2011. Advances in Occupational, Social, and Organizational Ergonomics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Further essential reading
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen. 2021. “Translation, Ergonomics and Cognition.” In Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ed. by Fabio Alves, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 147–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Riitta Jääskeläinen. 2019. “Ergonomics of Translation: Methodological, Practical, and Educational Implications.” In Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies, ed. by Helle V. Dam, Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger, and Karen Korning Zethsen, 132–150. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna, Regina Rogl, and Jelena Milosevic (eds). 2019. Translation Practice in the Field: Current Research on Socio-cognitive Processes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gumasing, Ma. Janice J., Emil Renfred A. Rendon & Josephine D. German
2023. Sustainable Ergonomic Workplace: Fostering Job Satisfaction and Productivity among Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) Workers. Sustainability 15:18 ► pp. 13516 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.