Article published In:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 24:2 (2018) ► pp.92115
References
Arai, T., Nakano, Y., Yamamoto, R., Hayashi, K., Takata, Y., Handa, A., & Inoue, S.
(2010) Development of a “Universal Design” font with blur tolerance (2): A comparison of the readability of Ming, Gothic, and “universal design” typefaces. 3rd International Conference for Universal Design. Hamamatsu: International Association for Universal Design (IAUD).Google Scholar
Beier, S. & Larson, K.
(2010) Design improvements for frequently misrecognized letters. Information Design Journal, 18(2), 118–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beier, S.
(2012) Reading letters: Designing for legibility. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Bouma, H.
(1971) Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11(5), 459–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dockeray, F. C. & Pillsbury, W. B.
(1910) The span of vision in reading and the legibility of letters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 123–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakamada, H., Ohya, M., Sakai, A., Sakurada, A., Tomomi, O., & Okajima, K.
(2011) Approach to UD font (universal design font) development. NEC Technical Journal, 6(2), 51–56.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. & Bigelow, C. A.
(2011) Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11(5): 81, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M.
(1985) Psychophysics of reading – I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25(2), 239–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackeben, M.
(1999) Sutained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition. Spatial Vision, 12(1), 51–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Enhancement of peripheral letter recognition by typographic features. Visual Impairment Research, 2(2), 95–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y., Yamamoto, R., Arai, T., Inoue, S., Hayashi, K., Takata, Y., & Handa, A.
(2010) Development of a “universal design” font with blur tolerance (1): A comparison of the readability of Ming, Gothic, and “universal design” typefaces. 3rd International Conference for Universal Design. Hamamatsu: International Association for Universal Design (IAUD).Google Scholar
Panasonic Corporation
(2017) Panasonic universal design book. Retrieved April 15, 2018, from [URL]
Phillips, J. R., Johnson, K. O., & Browne, H. M.
(1983) A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(3), 243–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Punsongserm, R.
(2012a) Viewpoint of using a roman-like typeface: Disappearance of singularity and legibility. Humanities Journal, 19(1), 113–145. (In Thai).Google Scholar
(2012b) Typographic errors: Common mistakes of Thai typography influenced on reading. The Fine and Applied Arts Journal, 7(1), 61–80. (In Thai).Google Scholar
(2015) Legibility and readability of roman-like Thai typeface. The Fine and Applied Arts Journal, 10(1), 99–128. (In Thai).Google Scholar
Punsongserm, R., Sunaga, S., & Ihara, H.
(2015) The typeface priority of Thai characters for identification: Studying based on blurring tests. 2015 Annual Conference of the 5th Branch of JSSD (71–72). Fukuoka: Kyushu University.Google Scholar
(2017a) Thai typefaces (Part 1): Assumption on visibility and legibility problems. Archives of Design Research, 30(1), 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Thai typefaces (Part 2): Criticism based on legibility test of some isolated characters. Archives of Design Research, 30(2), 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Effectiveness of the homologous thai letterforms on visibility under a simulated condition of low visual acuity. 11th International Conference Typography Day 2018. Mumbai: Sir J.J. Institute of Applied Art.Google Scholar
Rattanakasamsuk, K.
(2013) Elderly vision on legibility of Thai letters presented on LED panal. ACA2013 Thanyaburi: Blooming Color for Life (70–73). Thanyaburi: Asia Color Association and Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Schotter, R. E., Masson, E. J. M., Potter, C. M., & Treiman, R.
(2016) So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, E. C.
(1888) The relative legibility of the small letters. The American Journal of Psychology, 1(3), 402–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schotter, R. E., Angele, B., & Rayner, K.
(2012) Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Percepttion, & Psychophysics, 741, 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teeravarunyou, S. & Laosirihongthong, T.
(2003) Dynamic legibility of standard Thai fonts on traffic highway sign. 6th Asian Design International Conference. Tsukuba: Tsukuba International Congress Center.Google Scholar
Tinker, M. A.
(1928) The relative legibility of letters, the digits, and of certain mathematical signs. Journal of General Psychology, 11, 472–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1963) Legibility of print. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Waleetorncheepsawat, B., Pungrassamee, P., Obama, T., & Ikeda, M.
(2012) Visual acuity of Thai letters with and without cataract experiencing goggles. Journal of the Color Science Association of Japan, 361, 216–217.Google Scholar
Waleetorncheepsawat, B., Pungrassamee, P., Ikeda, M., & Obama, T.
(2013) Proper-sized Thai letters on different background contrasts and illumination environment suitable for elderlies. ACA2013 Thanyaburi: Blooming Color for Life (74–77). Thanyaburi: Asia Color Association and Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi.Google Scholar
Waller, R.
(2007) Comparing typefaces for airport signs. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Punsongserm, Rachapoom
2020. Comparative Effectiveness of Homologous Thai Letterforms on Visual Word Recognition: Thai Universal Design Font versus Familiar Thai Text Fonts. Archives of Design Research 33:3  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Punsongserm, Rachapoom
2023. Effectiveness of Predominant Letterforms in Multi-Viewing Distances: Thai Universal Design Font Versus Familiar Thai Text Fonts. Archives of Design Research 36:4  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Punsongserm, Rachapoom & Pittaya Suvakunta
2022. Optimal Typeface and Type Size on Thai Drug Labeling and Drug Documentation: A Recommendation for Legal Development. Archives of Design Research 35:4  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Punsongserm, Rachapoom & Pittaya Suvakunta
2022. Do the Small Thai Font Sizes on Drug Labels and Documentation Facilitate Thai Readers? A Practical Review . Archives of Design Research 35:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.