Text coherence can be marked linguistically by using connectives and lexical signals that make coherence relations explicit. This study focuses on the influence of such markers on text comprehension in ecologically valid contexts. A first experiment shows how readers in a business meeting and in a laboratory study benefit from the explicit marking of coherence relations. A second experiment shows how poor readers in secondary education benefit from coherence marking while answering text comprehension questions. We argue in favor of an interaction between cognitively oriented research on discourse representation and document design research, to solve crucial questions like: how do we design optimally readable texts?
2019. Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada
2018. RST Signalling Corpus: a corpus of signals of coherence relations. Language Resources and Evaluation 52:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada
2018. Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers. Discourse Processes 55:8 ► pp. 743 ff.
Fajardo, Inmaculada, Gema Tavares, Vicenta Ávila & Antonio Ferrer
2013. Towards text simplification for poor readers with intellectual disability: When do connectives enhance text cohesion?. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34:4 ► pp. 1267 ff.
Fajardo, Inmaculada, Vicenta Ávila, Antonio Ferrer, Gema Tavares, Marcos Gómez & Ana Hernández
2014. Easy-to-read Texts for Students with Intellectual Disability: Linguistic Factors Affecting Comprehension. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27:3 ► pp. 212 ff.
Glaser, Manuela, Manuel Knoos & Stephan Schwan
2022. Localizing, describing, interpreting: effects of different audio text structures on attributing meaning to digital pictures. Instructional Science 50:5 ► pp. 729 ff.
2017. Processing of positive-causal and negative-causal coherence relations in primary school children and adults: a test of the cumulative cognitive complexity approach in German. Journal of Child Language 44:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Kraal, Astrid, Arnout W. Koornneef, Nadira Saab & Paul W. van den Broek
2018. Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing 31:9 ► pp. 2017 ff.
Moncada, Fernando
2018. Interacción entre conectores y conocimiento previo en el procesamiento de la coherencia causal. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 76 ► pp. 179 ff.
OĞUZ, Enis & Duygu ÖZGE
2020. A Developmental Study of the Turkish Connectives. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Patterson, Alexis, Diego Roman, Michelle Friend, Jonathan Osborne & Brian Donovan
2018. Reading for meaning: The foundational knowledge every teacher of science should have. International Journal of Science Education 40:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
2021. Analysing Discourse Coherence in Students’ L2 Writing: Rhetorical Structure and the Use of Connectives. In Developing Advanced English Language Competence [English Language Education, 22], ► pp. 237 ff.
Scholman, Merel C. J., Liam Blything, Kate Cain, Jet Hoek & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2022. Discourse rules: the effects of clause order principles on the reading process. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37:10 ► pp. 1277 ff.
Schumann, Jennifer, Sandrine Zufferey & Steve Oswald
2021. The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives. Argumentation 35:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
Swarts, Jason
2022. Signaling Context in Topic-Based Writing. Technical Communication 69:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
van Silfhout, Gerdineke, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted Sanders
2015. Connectives as Processing Signals: How Students Benefit in Processing Narrative and Expository Texts. Discourse Processes 52:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
van Silfhout, Gerdineke, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J.M. Sanders
Winterboer, Andi K., Martin I. Tietze, Maria K. Wolters & Johanna D. Moore
2011. The user model-based summarize and refine approach improves information presentation in spoken dialog systems. Computer Speech & Language 25:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Yin, Zihan
2015. The Use of Cohesive Devices in News Language: Overuse, Underuse or Misuse?. RELC Journal 46:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.