Full-text

Increased letter spacing and greater letter width improve reading acuity in low vision readers
References

References

Action for blind people
(2004) Making it clear: Guidelines to producing printed material for people who are blind or partially sighted. Retrieved from https://​s27807​.pcdn​.co​/wp​-content​/uploads​/making​_it​_clear​_guidelines​-afsl​.pdf
Ahrens, T., & Mugikura, S.
(2014) Size-specific adjustments to type designs: An investigation of the principles guiding the design of optical sizes. Just Another Foundry.Google Scholar
Alió, J. L., Radner, W., Plaza-Puche, A. B., Ortiz, D., Neipp, C. M., Quiles, J. M., & Rodríguez-Marín, J.
(2008) Design of short Spanish sentences for measuring reading performance: Radner-Vissum test: Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 34(4), 638–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arditi, A., Knoblauch, K., & Grunwald, I.
(1990) Reading with fixed and variable character pitch’, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7(10), 2011–2015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arditi, Aries
(2017) Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility. Journal of Vision, 17(5), 8–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arditi, Aries, & Cho, J.
(2005) Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research, 45(23), 2926–2933. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baines, P.
(2004) The end of typography: Slow death by default. Eye Magazine, Spring.Google Scholar
Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., & Nacenta, M.
(2008) Seeing things in the clouds: The effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 193–202). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beier, S.
(2016) Letterform Research: An academic orphan. Visible Language, 50(2), 64.Google Scholar
(2017) Type Tricks: Your personal guide to type design. BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Beier, S., Bernard, J.-B., & Castet, E.
(2018) Numeral legibility and visual complexity. In DRS Design Research Society, 2018: Limerick. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beier, S., & Dyson, M. C.
(2014) The influence of serifs on ‘h’ and ‘i’: Useful knowledge from design-led scientific research. Visible Language, 47(3), 74–95.Google Scholar
Beier, S., & Larson, K.
(2010) Design Improvements for Frequently Misrecognized Letters. Information Design Journal, 18(2), 118–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
(2019a) The effect of age and font on reading ability. Visible Language, 53(3), 51–69.Google Scholar
(2019b) Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles. Acta Psychologica, 199, 102904. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, M., Liao, C. H., & Mills, M.
(2001) The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In CHI’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 175–176). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, H.
(1970) Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. C., Goldstein, J. E., Chan, T. L., Massof, R., Ramulu, P., & Low Vision Research Network Study Group
(2014) Characterizing functional complaints in patients seeking outpatient low-vision services in the United States. Ophthalmology, 121(8), 1655–1662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burggraaff, M. C., van Nispen, R. M. A., Hoek, S., Knol, D. L., & van Rens, G. H. M. B.
(2010) Feasibility of the Radner Reading Charts in low-vision patients. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 248(11), 1631–1637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burmistrov, I., Zlokazova, T., Ishmuratova, I., & Semenova, M.
(2016) Legibility of light and ultra-light fonts: Eye tracking study. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1–6). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calossi, A., Boccardo, L., Fossetti, A., & Radner, W.
(2014) Design of short Italian sentences to assess near vision performance. Journal of Optometry, 7(4), 203–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H.
(1937) Optical scale in typefounding. Typography, 4, 2–6.Google Scholar
Chung, S. T. L.
(2014) Size or spacing: Which limits letter recognition in people with age-related macular degeneration? Vision Research, 101, 167–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, S. T. L., & Bernard, J.-B.
(2018) Bolder print does not increase reading speed in people with central vision loss. Vision Research, 153, 98–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, S. T. L., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E.
(1998) Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38(19), 2949–2962. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobres, J., Reimer, B., Parikhal, L., Wean, E., & Chahine, N.
(2015) The Incredible Shrinking Letter: How Font Size Affects the Legibility of Text Viewed in Brief Glances. In Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: driving assessment 2015 (pp. 435–442). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, M. C., & Beier, S.
(2016) Investigating typographic differentiation: Italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis. Information Design Journal, 22(1), 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, D. C., Schuchard, R. A., & Watson, G.
(1999) Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36(4), 356–364.Google Scholar
Garvey, P. M., Zineddin, A. Z., & Pietrucha, M. T.
(2001) Letter legibility for signs and other large format applications. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(18), 1443–1447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, P. M., Eie, W.-Y., & Klenna, M. J.
(2016) The effect of font characteristics on large format display. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 1(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hess, R. F., Dakin, S. C., & Kapoor, N.
(2000) The foveal ‘crowding’ effect: Physics or physiology? Vision Research, 40(4), 365–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kingery, D., & Furuta, R.
(1997) Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: A study of typeface, point size, screen resolution, and monitor size. Information Processing & Management, 33(5), 685–696. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitchel, J.
Larson, K., & Carter, M.
(2016) Sitka: A collaboration between type design and science. In M. C. Dyson & C. Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital Fonts and Reading (Vol. 1, pp. 37–53). World Scientific. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legge, G. E., Rubin, G. S., Pelli, D. G., & Schleske, M. M.
(1985) Psychophysics of reading – II. Low vision. Vision Research, 25(2), 253–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., & Arditi, A.
(2001) How crowding affects letter confusion. Optometry & Vision Science, 78(1), 50–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maaijwee, K., Mulder, P., Radner, W., & Van Meurs, J. C.
(2008) Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts. Optometry and Vision Science, 85(5), 353–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, J. S., Legge, G. E., & Bane, M. C.
(1996) Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37(8), 1492–1501.Google Scholar
Morris, R. A., Aquilante, K., Yager, D., & Bigelow, C.
(2002) P-13: Serifs slow RSVP reading at very small sizes, but don’t matter at larger sizes. In SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 33(1), 244–247. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munch, I. C., Jørgensen, A. R., & Radner, W.
(2016) The Danish version of the Radner Reading Chart: Design and empirical testing of sentence optotypes in subjects of varying educational background. Acta Ophthalmologica, 94(2), 182–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neelam, K., Nolan, J., Chakravarthy, U., & Beatty, S.
(2009) Psychophysical Function in Age-related Maculopathy. Survey of Ophthalmology, 54(2), 167–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pušnik, N., Podlesek, A., & Možina, K.
(2016) Typeface comparison – Does the x-height of lower-case letters increased to the size of upper-case letters speed up recognition? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 54, 164–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radner, W.
(2017) Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 255(8), 1465–1482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radner, W., & Diendorfer, G.
(2014) English sentence optotypes for measuring reading acuity and speed – The English version of the RADNER Reading Charts. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 252(8), 1297–1303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radner, Wolfgang, Obermayer, W., Richter-Mueksch, S., Willinger, U., Velikay-Parel, M., & Eisenwort, B.
(2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 240(6), 461–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Bloch, S. B., Fuchs, J., Hansen, L. H., Larsen, M., LaCour, M., Lund-Andersen, H., & Sander, B.
(2013) A 4-year longitudinal study of 555 patients treated with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 120(12), 2630–2636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Brandi, S., Fuchs, J., Hansen, L. H., Lund-Andersen, H., Sander, B., & Larsen, M.
(2015) Visual outcomes in relation to time to treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93(7), 616–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, A. M., Farinha, C. L., Radner, W., Diendorfer, G., Loureiro, M. F., & Murta, J. N.
(2016) Development of the Portuguese version of a standardized reading test: The Radner-Coimbra Charts. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 79(4), 238–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheedy, J. E., Subbaram, M. V., Zimmerman, A. B., & Hayes, J. R.
(2005) Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 797–815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smuc, M., Windhager, F., Siebenhandl, K., & Egger, S.
(2007) Impaired Visibility Typeface Test– Report. Report In-Safety A, 2.Google Scholar
Soleimani, H., & Mohammadi, E.
(2012) The effect of text typographical features on legibility, comprehension, and retrieval of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szpiro, S. F. A., Hashash, S., Zhao, Y., & Azenkot, S.
(2016) How people with low vision access computing devices: Understanding challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 171–180). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarita-Nistor, L., Lam, D., Brent, M. H., Steinbach, M. J., & González, E. G.
(2013) Courier: A better font for reading with age-related macular degeneration. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d’Ophtalmologie, 48(1), 56–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, W.
(1986) Letters of credit: A view of type design. London: Gordon Fraser.Google Scholar
Tunold, S., Radianti, J., Gjøsæter, T., & Chen, W.
(2019) Perceivability of Map Information for Disaster Situations for People with Low Vision. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 342–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unger, G.
(2018) Theory of type design. nai010.Google Scholar
Virsu, V., & Rovamo, J.
(1979) Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37(3), 475–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Chung, S. T. L., & Tjan, B. S.
(2017) Object crowding in age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Vision, 17(1), 33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R.
(2007) Comparing typefaces for airport signs. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W. L., Su, X., Li, X., Cheung, C. M. G., Klein, R., Cheng, C.-Y., & Wong, T. Y.
(2014) Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2(2), e106–e116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Y.-Z., Lorsung, E. A., Mansfield, J. S., Bigelow, C., & Legge, G. E.
(2018) Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 59(10), 4182–4189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yager, D., Aquilante, K., & Plass, R.
(1998) High and low luminance letters, acuity reserve, and font effects on reading speed. Vision Research, 38(17), 2527–2531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar