Isotype has been a purely historical phenomenon for about ten years. It proposed a system for presenting information in visual form; but how can designers now learn from this work ? It is argued that Isotype cannot be fully articulated as method, and that it should be understood rather as approach. Such an understanding must come from 'authentic ' historical presentation, which avoids imposing current concepts. Some inappropriate treatments are cited. But, as the revival of the 'transformer7 suggests, Isotype can still be a fruitful influence. To help further study, the documentation of the subject is surveyed.
1990. Agit-Prop. Rethinking Marxism 3:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Moretti, Matteo
2023. Design for Graphicacy: The Case of Glocal Climate Change. In Proceedings of the 3rd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Image and Imagination [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 631], ► pp. 733 ff.
Muurlink, Olav, Anthony M. Gould & Jean-Etienne Joullié
2023. Clustered Iconography: A Resurrected Method for Representing Multidimensional Data. Sociological Methods & Research 52:2 ► pp. 956 ff.
Nemeth, Elisabeth
2019. Visualizing Relations in Society and Economics: Otto Neurath’s Isotype-Method Against the Background of his Economic Thought. In Neurath Reconsidered [Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 336], ► pp. 117 ff.
Perks, Sue
2015. Transforming the Natural History Museum in London: Isotype and the New Exhibition Scheme. In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, ► pp. 389 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.