Some typographers have proposed that typeface familiarity is defined by the amount of time that a reader has been exposed to a typeface design, while other typographers have proposed that familiarity is defined by the commonalities in letter shapes. These two hypotheses were tested by measuring the reading speed and preferences of participants. Participants were tested twice with common and uncommon letter shapes, once before and once after spending 20 minutes reading a story with the font. The results indicate that the exposure period has an effect on the speed of reading, but the uncommon letter shapes did not. Readers did not like the uncommon letter shapes. This has implications for the selection of type and the design of future typefaces.
Cai, Tianyuan, Aleena Gertrudes Niklaus, Bernard Kerr, Michael Kraley & Zoya Bylinskii
2023. Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Cai, Tianyuan, Aleena Gertrudes Niklaus, Bernard Kerr, Michael Kraley & Zoya Bylinskii
2024. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Medved, Tanja, Anja Podlesek & Klementina Možina
2023. Influence of letter shape on readers’ emotional experience, reading fluency, and text comprehension and memorisation. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Palmén, Hilary, Michael Gilbert & David Crossland
2023. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Wallace, Shaun, Zoya Bylinskii, Jonathan Dobres, Bernard Kerr, Sam Berlow, Rick Treitman, Nirmal Kumawat, Kathleen Arpin, Dave B. Miller, Jeff Huang & Ben D. Sawyer
2022. Towards Individuated Reading Experiences: Different Fonts Increase Reading Speed for Different Individuals. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29:4 ► pp. 1 ff.
ORTAKÖYLÜ, Seçil & Erhan DURUKAN
2021. Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının farklı metin tasarımlarına ilişkin görüşleri. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
2020. Impact of digital text variables on legibility for persons with dyslexia. Dyslexia 26:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Powell, Steven L. & Ashton D. Trice
2020. The Impact of a Specialized Font on the Reading Performance of Elementary Children with Reading Disability. Contemporary School Psychology 24:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Wilkins, Arnold, Katie Smith & Olivier Penacchio
2020. The Influence of Typography on Algorithms that Predict the Speed and Comfort of Reading. Vision 4:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Beier, Sofie & Chiron A.T. Oderkerk
2019. Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles. Acta Psychologica 199 ► pp. 102904 ff.
Behrisch, M., M. Blumenschein, N. W. Kim, L. Shao, M. El‐Assady, J. Fuchs, D. Seebacher, A. Diehl, U. Brandes, H. Pfister, T. Schreck, D. Weiskopf & D. A. Keim
2018. Quality Metrics for Information Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 37:3 ► pp. 625 ff.
Chung, Susana T.L. & Jean-Baptiste Bernard
2018. Bolder print does not increase reading speed in people with central vision loss. Vision Research 153 ► pp. 98 ff.
Eiband, Malin, Emanuel von Zezschwitz, Daniel Buschek & Heinrich Hußmann
2016. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 2041 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.