Article published in:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 21:2 (2014) ► pp. 129145
References
Agrawala, M., Li, W., & Berthouzoz, F
(2011) Design principles for visual communication. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 607–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, J
(1981) Graphics and graphic-information-processing. New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
British Broadcasting Corporation
(2010) Netherlands – Brazil. BBC Sport World Cup 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://​news​.bbc​.co​.uk​/sport2​/hi​/football​/world​_cup​_2010​/8729486​.stm
Carpendale, M.S.T
(2003) Considering visual variables as a basis for information visualisation. University of Calgary, Department of computer science 2001–693–16.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L
(2008) Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 1061, 579–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, M
(2011) The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 446–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessell, A.M., & Tversky, B
(2008) Cognitive methods for visualizing space, time, and agents. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
(2011) Visualizing space, time, and agents: production, performance, and preference. Cognitive Processes, 121, 43–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M
(2006) Graph design for the eye and the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A
(1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 111, 65–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald-Ross, M
(1977) How numbers are shown: A review of research on the presentation of quantitive data in texts. AV Communication Review, 25(4), 359–409.Google Scholar
Shah, P., & Freedman, E.G
(2011) Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 560–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smallman, H.S., & Cook, M.B
(2011) Naïve realism: folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 579–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B
(2001) Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2011a) Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 499–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Spatial thought, social thought. In T.W. Schubert & A. Maass (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 17–38). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A
(1991) Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 231, 515–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vande Moere, A., & Purchase, H
(2011) On the role of design in information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 356–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J., & Tversky, B
(1999) Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 271, 1073–1079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., & Norman, D.A
(1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 181, 87–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar