Investigating typographic differentiation: Italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis
Text designers are likely to benefit from guidance on how to use typographic differentiation for emphasis. Three experiments use purposely-designed fonts to explore the size and nature of differences in the stylistic characteristics of fonts (weight, width, contrast, italic) which affect letter identification. Results indicate that words set in bold and expanded fonts, when alternated with words set in a Neutral test font, may impair performance, whereas changing to italic does not. Possible explanations are explored through measuring the physical and perceptual similarities of the test fonts.
Keywords: typography, salience, typeface, legibility
Published online: 28 July 2016
(2013) Legibility investigations: controlling typeface variables. Praxis and Poetics: Research through Design, Conference Proceedings (pp. 92–95). Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead.
Gauthier, I., Wong, A.C.-N., Hayward, W.G., & Cheung, O.S.
Haber, R.N., & Hershenson, M.
Medler, D.A., & Binder, J.R.
(2005) MCWord: An On-Line Orthographic Database of the English Language. http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
O’Brien, F., & Cousineau, D.
Cited by other publications
Beier, Sofie & Chiron A.T. Oderkerk
Chow, Kenny K. N. & Kin Wai Michael Siu
Thiessen, Myra, Sofie Beier & Hannah Keage
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.