Article published in:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 22:1 (2016) ► pp. 318


Beier, S.
(2012) Reading letters: designing for legibility. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
(2013) Legibility investigations: controlling typeface variables. Praxis and Poetics: Research through Design, Conference Proceedings (pp. 92–95). Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead.
Bringhurst, R.
(1992) The elements of typographic style. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks Publishers.
Dyson, M.C.
(2014) Applying psychological theory to typography: is how we perceive letterforms special? In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 215–242). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Frutiger, A.
(1998) Signs and symbols: their design and meaning. London: Ebury Press.
Gauthier, I., Wong, A.C.-N., Hayward, W.G., & Cheung, O.S.
(2006) Font tuning associated with expertise in letter perception. Perception, 35, 541–559. Crossref link
Haber, R.N., & Hershenson, M.
(1980) The psychology of visual perception. New York, London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Legge, G.E.
(2007) Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Medler, D.A., & Binder, J.R.
(2005) MCWord: An On-Line Orthographic Database of the English Language. http://​www​.neuro​.mcw​.edu​/mcword/
O’Brien, F., & Cousineau, D.
(2014) Representing error bars in within-subject designs in typical software packages. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10(1), 56–67.Crossref link
Rastle, K.
(2007) Visual word recognition. In M.G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 71–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sanocki, T.
(1987) Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific schematic tuning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 267–278. Crossref link
(1988) Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 472–480. Crossref link
(1991a) Intrapattern and interpattern relations in letter recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 924–941. Crossref link
(1991b) Looking for a structural network: effects of changing size and style on letter recognition. Perception, 20(4), 529–541. Crossref link
Tinker, M.A.
(1965) Bases for effective reading. Minneapolis: Lund Press.
Walker, P.
(2008) Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence. Visual Cognition, 16(8), 1022–1058. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Beier, Sofie & Chiron A.T. Oderkerk
2019. Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles. Acta Psychologica 199  pp. 102904 ff. Crossref logo
Bigelow, Charles
2019. Typeface features and legibility research. Vision Research 165  pp. 162 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.