Article published In:
Information Design JournalVol. 29:1 (2024) ► pp.25–35
Script-style degrees
Letter recognition in regular versus special fonts
Previous work has shown that letters presented in special fonts with a high degree of script style have a poor recognition rate. We investigated whether there is a breaking point where this deficit sets in. In an experimental paradigm using a three-letter string partial report, 32 participants were presented with test stimuli of four new fonts with gradually increasing script style. The results of our investigation showed that each level of increasing script style resulted in significantly worse recognition. These findings demonstrate that for maximum letter recognition, the font style should be based on simple and familiar letter skeletons.
Keywords: script, typefaces, font style, legibility, letter recognition
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Font legibility
- 1.2Reading models
- 1.3Objectives
- 2.The experiment: Trigram partial report
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Stimuli
- 2.3Apparatus
- 2.4Task
- 2.5Adaptive staircase Procedure
- 2.6Procedure
- 2.7Results
- 3.Discussion
- 3.1Impaired recognition
- 3.2Text as image
- 3.3Limitations
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (44)
Beier, S.
(2017) Type
Tricks: Your personal guide to type design. BIS Publishers.
Beier, S., Bernard, J. B., & Castet, E.
(2018) Numeral
legibility and visual complexity. DRS Design Research Society. 
Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A.
(2022) Closed
letter counters impair recognition. Applied
Ergonomics,
101
1, 103709.
Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
(2021) High
letter stroke contrast impairs letter recognition of bold fonts. Applied
Ergonomics,
97
1.
Beier, S., Sand, K., & Starrfelt, R.
(2017) Legibility
Implications of Embellished Display Typefaces. Visible
Language,
51
(1), 112–133.
Bernard, J. B., & Chung, S. T.
(2011) The
dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target–flanker similarity. Journal of
Vision,
11
(8), 1–16.
Brumberger, E. R.
(2003) The
rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical
Communication,
50
(2), 206–223.
Celhay, F., Boysselle, J., & Cohen, J.
(2015) Food
packages and communication through typeface design: The exoticism of exotypes. Food Quality and
Preference,
39
1, 167–175.
Chanceaux, M., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J.
(2014) Effects
of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. Journal of
Vision,
14
(6), 7–7.
Childers, T. L., & Jass, J.
(2002) All
Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer
Memory. Journal of Consumer
Psychology,
12
(2), 93–106.
Choi, S., Yamasaki, T., & Aizawa, K.
(2016) Typeface
Emotion Analysis for Communication on Mobile Messengers. Proceedings of the 1st International
Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities – AltMM
’16, 37–40.
Chu, X. Y. M., Tok, D., & Gui, J. J.
(2021) Why
Not Set Pen to Paper? How Typeface Design Influence Charitable Behaviors. ACR North American
Advances.
Dai, Y.
(2021) Comparison
of Emphasis Point Towards Marketing Strategies Between Pepsi & Coca-Cola: 6th International
Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2021), Sanya,
China.
Dehaene, S.
(2009) Reading
in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. Viking New York.
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A.
(2004) Font
appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business
Research,
57
(8), 873–880.
Fiset, D., Blais, C., Ethier-Majcher, C., Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Gosselin, F.
(2008) Features
for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological
Science,
19
(11), 1161–1168.
Grohmann, B., Giese, J. L., & Parkman, I. D.
(2013) Using
type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands. Journal of Brand
Management,
20
(5), 389–403.
Hudson, J.
Izadi, A., & Patrick, V. M.
(2020) The
power of the pen: Handwritten fonts promote haptic engagement. Psychology &
Marketing,
37
(8), 1082–1100.
Keage, H. A., Coussens, S., Kohler, M., Thiessen, M., & Churches, O. F.
(2014) Investigating
letter recognition in the brain by varying typeface: An event-related potential study. Brain
and
Cognition,
88
1, 83–89.
Kesten, H.
(1958) Accelerated
stochastic approximation. The Annals of Mathematical
Statistics,
29
(1), 41–59.
Kim, M. J., & Lim, J. H.
(2019) A
comprehensive review on logo literature: Research topics, findings, and future
directions. Journal of Marketing
Management,
35
(13–14), 1291–1365.
Kulahcioglu, T., & de Melo, G.
(2018) Predicting
Semantic Signatures of Fonts. 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing
(ICSC), 115–122.
Lanthier, S. N., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D.
(2009) Not
all visual features are created equal: Early processing in letter and word
recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review,
16
(1), 67–73.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J.
(2012) OpenSesame:
An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research
Methods,
44
(2), 314–324.
Mirchandani, S., Zheng, L., & Gong, J.
(2018) Typeface
Semantic Attribute Prediction from Rasterized Font
Representations. 61.
Park, J., Velasco, C., & Spence, C.
(2022) “Looking
sharp”: Price typeface influences awareness of spending in mobile payment. Psychology &
Marketing,
39
(6), 1170–1189.
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C.
(2006) Feature
detection and letter identification. Vision
Research,
46
(28), 4646–4674.
Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A.
(2007) Parts,
wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. Plos
One,
2
(8), e680.
Petit, J. P., & Grainger, J.
(2002) Masked
partial priming of letter perception. Visual
Cognition,
9
(3), 337–353.
Puškarević, I., Nedeljković, U., Dimovski, V., & Možina, K.
(2016) An
eye tracking study of attention to print advertisements: Effects of typeface
figuration. Journal of Eye Movement
Research,
9
(5).
Reichle, E. D.
(2020) Computational
models of reading: A handbook. Oxford University Press.
Ren, X., Xia, L., & Du, J.
(2018) Delivering
warmth by hand: Customer responses to different formats of written communication. Journal of
Services
Marketing,
32
(2), 223–234.
Rosa, E., Perea, M., & Enneson, P.
(2016) The
role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment
technique. Acta
Psychologica,
169
1, 133–142.
Schroll, R., Schnurr, B., & Grewal, D.
(2018) Humanizing
Products with Handwritten Typefaces. Journal of Consumer Research.
Thiessen, M., Beier, S., & Keage, H.
(2020) A
Review of the Cognitive Effects of Disfluent Typography on Functional Reading. The Design
Journal,
23
(5), 797–815.
Thiessen, M., Keage, H., Hwang, I., Astley, J., & Beier, S.
(2022) Effect
of typeface complexity on automatic whole word reading processes. Visible
Language.
Thiessen, M., Kohler, M., Churches, O., Coussens, S., & Keage, H.
(2015) Brainy
Type: A look at how the brain processes typographic information. Visible
Language,
49
(1/2), 175.
Tinker, M. A.
(1963) Legibility
of Print. Iowa State University Press.
Treutwein, B.
(1995) Adaptive
psychophysical procedures. Vision
Research,
35
(17), 2503–2522.
Wang, H., He, X., & Legge, G. E.
(2014) Effect
of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of
Vision,
14
(8), 6–6.
Wu, R., Han, X., & Kardes, F. R.
(2021) Special
fonts: The competing roles of difficulty and uniqueness in consumer inference. Psychology &
Marketing,
38
(1), 86–100.
Xiong, Y. Z., Lorsung, E. A., Mansfield, J. S., Bigelow, C., & Legge, G. E.
(2018) Fonts
Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual
Science,
59
(10), 4182–4189.
Žarko, J., & Nedeljković, U.
(2020) The
effect of controlling the weight variable on the typeface attribute assessment. Proceedings –
The Tenth International Symposium GRID 2020, 707–717.