Article published in:

Semiotics: A way of thinking & approaching information design
Edited by Priscila Lena Farias and João Queiroz
[Information Design Journal 23:2] 2017
► pp. 127–147

Visualizing triadic relations: Diagrams for Charles S. Peirce’s classifications of signs

Priscila Lena Farias

João Queiroz

Published online: 03 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.2.03far

References

Amadori, C. E.

(2001) Semiótica, signos e interfaces. Master degree thesis, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.

Anderson, M., & Armen, C.

(1998) Diagrammatic reasoning and color. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Formalization of Reasoning with Visual and Diagrammatic Representations, Orlando, Florida, US.

Anderson, M., & McCartney, R.

(1995) Inter-diagrammatic Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada.

Balat, M.

(1990) Type, Trace, Ton, le ‘ton’ peircien. Semiosis 57–58.

Borges, P.

(2010) Mensagens cifradas: a construção de linguagens diagramáticas. Ph.D. dissertation, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.

Bounford, T., & Campbell, A.

(2000) Digital diagrams: how to design and present statistical information effectively. New York: Watson-Guptill.

De Waal, C.

(2013) Peirce—A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.

Farias, P. L.

(2002) Sign design, ou o design dos signos: A construção de diagramas dinâmicos das classes de signos de C.S. Peirce. Ph.D. dissertation, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.

(2003) Images, diagrams and metaphors: a contribution from semiotics to information design. In: C. G. Spinillo; & S. G. Coutinho (Org.). Selected Readings of the Information Design International Conference (pp. 71–78). Recife: SBDI.

(2008) O conceito de diagrama na semiótica de Charles S. Peirce. Tríades em Revista, 1, 1–13.

Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.

(2000) Notes for a dynamic diagram of Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs. Semiotica 131(1/2), 19–44.

(2001) Sign Design: nuevas estrategias para modelar procesos y estructuras signicas. SIGNA—Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica 10, 127–147.

(2003) On diagrams for Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 classes of signs. Semiotica 147(1/4): 165–184.

(2004) 10cubes and 3N3: using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs. Semiotica 151(1/4): 41–63.

(2006) Images, diagrams, and metaphors: Hypoicons in the context of Peirce’s sixty-six-fold classification of signs. Semiotica, 162: 287–307.

(2014a) On Peirce’s diagrammatic models for ten classes of signs. Semiotica, 202: 657–671.

(2014b) On Peirce’s visualization of the classifications of signs: finding a common pattern in diagrams. In T. Thellefsen, & B. Sørensen (Org.). Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition (pp. 527–536). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.

Freadman, A.

(2001) The Classifications of Signs (II): 1903. In M. Bergman & J. Queiroz (Eds.), The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition. Pub. 130116–1710a. Available at http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/freadman-anne-classifications-signs-ii-1903, January 28 2017.

Harel, D.

(1995) On visual formalisms. In J. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan & B. Chandrasenkaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning (pp. 235–271). Cambridge: AAAI.

Hoffmann, M. H.

(2001) The 1903 classification of triadic sign-relations. In J. Queiroz & R. Gudwin (Eds.), Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Available at www.digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp.br/hoffmann/p-sighof.htm, January 28 2017.

Houser, N.

(1991) A Peircean classification of models, In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.). On Semiotic Modeling (pp. 431–439). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Johansen, D.

(1993) Dialogic Semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Knuuttila, T.

(2005) Models, representation, and mediation. Philosophy of Science 72. 1260–1271.

Lieb, I. C.

(1977) Appendix B. In C. S. Hardwick (ed.), Semiotics and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (pp. 161–166). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lizska, J.

(1996) A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Maróstica, A. H.

(1992) Ars Combinatoria and time: LLull, Leibniz and Peirce. Studia Llulliana 32, 105–134.

Marty, R.

(1982a) C. S. Peirce’s phaneroscopy and semiotics. Semiotica 41(1/4), 169–181.

(1982b) Le treillis des 28 classes de signes hexadiques. Semiosis 25–26, 1–12.

(1990) L’algèbre des signes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Merrell, F.

(1991) Thought-signs, sign-events. Semiotica 87(1/2), 1–58.

(1997) Peirce, signs and meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Olsen, L.

(1999) On Peirce’s systematic division of signs. Manuscript.

(2000) On Peirce’s systematic division of signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 36(4), 563–578.

Parker, K.

(1998) The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Peirce, C. S.

([1866–1913] 1994) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I–VI [C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (ed.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935], Vols. VII–VIII [A. W. Burks (ed.), same publisher, 1958]. Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation.

([1893–1913] 1998) The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. II. Peirce Edition Project. (Ed.) Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

(1967) Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. R. Robin (Ed.) Amherst-MS: University of Massachusetts.Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce,

Queiroz, J.

(2012) Dicent symbols in non-human semiotic processes. Biosemiotics 5, 1–11.

Queiroz, J., & Stjernfelt, F.

(eds.) (2011) Diagrammatical reasoning and Peircean logic representations. Semiotica 186, 1–439.

Robin, R. S.

(1967) Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

①

Savan, D.

(1987–1988) An introduction to C.S.Peirce’s full system of semeiotic. Monograph Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle 1.

Sivasankaran, V. K., & Owen, Charles L.

(1992) Data exploration: transposition operations in dynamic diagrams. Visible Language 28(3/4), 451–473.

Weiss, P., & Burks, A.

(1945) Peirce’s sixty-six signs. Journal of Philosophy XLII: 383–388.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Mittelberg, Irene

2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 2019:228 ► pp. 193 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.