Visualizing triadic relations: Diagrams for Charles S. Peirce’s classifications of signs
References (43)
Amadori, C. E.
(
2001)
Semiótica, signos e interfaces. Master degree thesis, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.
Anderson, M., & Armen, C.
(
1998)
Diagrammatic reasoning and color. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Formalization of Reasoning with Visual and Diagrammatic Representations, Orlando, Florida, US.
Anderson, M., & McCartney, R.
(
1995)
Inter-diagrammatic Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada.
Balat, M.
(
1990)
Type, Trace, Ton, le ‘ton’ peircien.
Semiosis 57–58.
Borges, P.
(
2010)
Mensagens cifradas: a construção de linguagens diagramáticas. Ph.D. dissertation, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.
Bounford, T., & Campbell, A.
(
2000)
Digital diagrams: how to design and present statistical information effectively. New York: Watson-Guptill.
De Waal, C.
(
2013)
Peirce—A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.
Farias, P. L.
(
2002)
Sign design, ou o design dos signos: A construção de diagramas dinâmicos das classes de signos de C.S. Peirce. Ph.D. dissertation, Communication and Semiotics, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.
Farias, P. L.
(
2003)
Images, diagrams and metaphors: a contribution from semiotics to information design. In:
C. G. Spinillo; &
S. G. Coutinho (Org.).
Selected Readings of the Information Design International Conference (pp. 71–78). Recife: SBDI.
Farias, P. L.
(
2008)
O conceito de diagrama na semiótica de Charles S. Peirce.
Tríades em Revista, 11, 1–13.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2000)
Notes for a dynamic diagram of Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs.
Semiotica 131(1/2), 19–44.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2001)
Sign Design: nuevas estrategias para modelar procesos y estructuras signicas.
SIGNA—Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica 101, 127–147.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2003)
On diagrams for Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 classes of signs.
Semiotica 147(1/4): 165–184.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2004)
10cubes and 3N3: using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirce’s classifications of signs.
Semiotica 151(1/4): 41–63.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2006)
Images, diagrams, and metaphors: Hypoicons in the context of Peirce’s sixty-six-fold classification of signs.
Semiotica, 1621: 287–307.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2014a)
On Peirce’s diagrammatic models for ten classes of signs.
Semiotica, 2021: 657–671.
Farias, P. L., & Queiroz, J.
(
2014b)
On Peirce’s visualization of the classifications of signs: finding a common pattern in diagrams. In
T. Thellefsen, &
B. Sørensen (Org.).
Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication and cognition (pp. 527–536). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Freadman, A.
(
2001)
The Classifications of Signs (II): 1903. In
M. Bergman &
J. Queiroz (Eds.),
The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition. Pub. 130116–1710a. Available at
[URL], January 28 2017.
Harel, D.
(
1995)
On visual formalisms. In
J. Glasgow,
N. H. Narayanan &
B. Chandrasenkaran (Eds.),
Diagrammatic reasoning (pp. 235–271). Cambridge: AAAI.
Hoffmann, M. H.
(
2001)
The 1903 classification of triadic sign-relations. In
J. Queiroz &
R. Gudwin (Eds.),
Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Available at
[URL], January 28 2017.
Houser, N.
(
1991)
A Peircean classification of models, In
M. Anderson &
F. Merrell (Eds.).
On Semiotic Modeling (pp. 431–439). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johansen, D.
(
1993)
Dialogic Semiosis. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Knuuttila, T.
(
2005)
Models, representation, and mediation.
Philosophy of Science 721. 1260–1271.
Lieb, I. C.
(
1977)
Appendix B. In
C. S. Hardwick (ed.),
Semiotics and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (pp. 161–166). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lizska, J.
(
1996)
A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Maróstica, A. H.
(
1992)
Ars Combinatoria and time: LLull, Leibniz and Peirce.
Studia Llulliana 321, 105–134.
Marty, R.
(
1982a)
C. S. Peirce’s phaneroscopy and semiotics.
Semiotica 41(1/4), 169–181.
Marty, R.
(
1982b)
Le treillis des 28 classes de signes hexadiques.
Semiosis 25–261, 1–12.
Merrell, F.
(
1991)
Thought-signs, sign-events.
Semiotica 87(1/2), 1–58.
Merrell, F.
(
1997)
Peirce, signs and meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Olsen, L.
(
1999)
On Peirce’s systematic division of signs. Manuscript.
Olsen, L.
(
2000)
On Peirce’s systematic division of signs. Transactions of the Charles S.
Peirce Society, 36(4), 563–578.
Parker, K.
(
1998)
The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Peirce, C. S.
(
[1866–1913] 1994)
The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I–VI1 [C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (ed.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935], Vols. VII–VIII1 [A. W. Burks (ed.), same publisher, 1958]. Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation.
Peirce, C. S.
(
[1893–1913] 1998)
The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. II1. Peirce Edition Project. (Ed.) Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S.
(
1967)
Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce.
R. Robin (Ed.) Amherst-MS: University of Massachusetts.
Queiroz, J.
(
2012)
Dicent symbols in non-human semiotic processes.
Biosemiotics 51, 1–11.
Queiroz, J., & Stjernfelt, F.
(eds.) (
2011)
Diagrammatical reasoning and Peircean logic representations.
Semiotica 1861, 1–439.
Robin, R. S.
(
1967)
Annotated Catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Savan, D.
(
1987–1988)
An introduction to C.S.Peirce’s full system of semeiotic.
Monograph Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle 11.
Sivasankaran, V. K., & Owen, Charles L.
(
1992)
Data exploration: transposition operations in dynamic diagrams.
Visible Language 28(3/4), 451–473.
Weiss, P., & Burks, A.
(
1945)
Peirce’s sixty-six signs.
Journal of Philosophy XLII1: 383–388.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Faltýnek, Dan & Ľudmila Lacková
2021.
In the Case of Protosemiosis: Indexicality vs. Iconicity of Proteins.
Biosemiotics 14:1
► pp. 209 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019.
Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis.
Semiotica 2019:228
► pp. 193 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.