Cover not available
Article published In:
Semiotics: A way of thinking & approaching information design
Edited by Priscila Lena Farias and João Queiroz
[Information Design Journal 23:2] 2017
► pp. 148–161

Semiotic inquiry and distributed significations

The sole purpose of inquiry is to fix belief-habit

 | Pantheon-Sorbonne University
Published online: 3 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.2.04dar
References (33)
References
Akrich, M., Callon, M, and Latour, B. (2006), Sociologie de la traduction: textes fondateurs, Paris, Presses des MINES. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belkhamsa, S. and Darras, B. (2009), L’objet et le cycle des habitudes et des changements d’habitude. Approche sémiotique. In B. Darras & S. Belkhamsa, Objet et Communication, MEI 30–31, Paris, L’Harmattan. p. 147–160.Google Scholar
Béguin, P. and Clot Y. (2004), L’action située dans le développement de l’activité, Activités, 1(2), 27–49. [URL] consulted le 12 01 2016.Google Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 7–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conein, B. & Jacopin, E. (1994), Action située et cognition, le savoir en place, Sociologie du travail, n.º 4/94, p. 475–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darras B. & Belkhamsa S. (2008), Faire corps avec le monde. Étude comparée des concepts d’affordance, d’enaction et d’habitude d’action, Recherche en communication, n.º 291. p. 125–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Modélisation dynamique de la communication de l’objet, approche systémique et sémiotique, In B. Darras & S. Belkhamsa. Objet et Communication, MEI 30–31, Paris, L’Harmattan, p. 160–184.Google Scholar
Darras B. (2008). Identité, authenticité et altérité. In Bernard Darras (Dir.) Images et études culturelles. Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne. p. 7–24Google Scholar
(2009), Usabilidade, Design cognitivo e design participativo nas hipermidias. In V. Ribas Ulbricht & A. Theresinha Cybis Pereira. Hipermidia um desafio da atualidade. Florianopolis, Pandion editora. p. 31–49 (ISBN 978-85-60946-24-2).Google Scholar
(2011), Design and pragmatic semiotics, Collection # 31. p. 7–21.Google Scholar
(2012), Qui sont les sémioticiens et que font-ils ? Enquête sur leurs relations avec le design et des médias, Signata, 3/2012. p. 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013), Modelização geral das relações humanas com os artefatos: estudo semiótico e sistêmico das interações, Líbero—São Paulo—v. 16, n. 31, p. 51–68.Google Scholar
(2014), Le design entre la conception et la pratique, la fin du dualisme. Approche pragmatique. Darras, B. et Findeli, A. Design: Savoir & Faire, Nîmes, Lucie Editions, p. 13–47.Google Scholar
(2016), Semiotics and information design. ‹metabolisme.design› an interactive tool for designers. In Virginia Tiradentes Souto, Carla Galvão Spinillo, Luciane Maria Fadel, Cristina Portugal. Selected Readings of the 7th Information Design International Conference . SBDI—The Brazilian Society of Information Design.Google Scholar
(2017), Design du codesign, axiologies et méthodologies du design participatif. Le rôle de de l’empathie et de la communication. In B. Darras et S. Vial, Design et communication. MEI 40. Paris, L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Dewey J. (1929), The Quest for Certainty, A study of the relation of knowledge and action, New York, Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar
Dewey J. & Bentley A. F. (1946), Interaction and transaction, The Journal of Philosophy, p. 505–517, London, Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farias, P. (2009). Semiótica e Cognição: Os conceitos de hábito e mudança de hábito em C.S. Peirce. Revista Eletrônica Informação e Cognição, v. 1, n. 1, p. 12–16. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Freeman R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houdé O. (2014), Le raisonnement, Paris, PUF, Que-sais-je? Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Law J. (2009), Actor network theory and material semiotics. In Bryan Turner, (ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory, Wiley—Blackwell publisher. p. 141–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A (2004), After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Newson, A. ; Sugget, E. & Sudjic, D. (2016). Designer Maker User. Phaidon.Google Scholar
Nöth, W. (2016). Habits, Habit Change, and the Habit of Habit Change According to Peirce. In West, D. E., & Anderson, M. Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit. Before and Beyond Consciousness, Springer International Publishing. p. 35–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935), Collected Papers, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1982–1996), Writings of Chartes Sanders Peirce. A Chronological Edition, edited by the «Peirce Edition Project», Bloomington, Indiana University Press, vol. 1–61.Google Scholar
Quéré, L. (1999), Action située et perception du sens. Raison Pratique. In M. de Fornel, & L. Quéré (Eds), La logique des situations. Nouveaux regards sur l’écologie des activités sociales, Paris, Édition de l’EHESS, p. 301–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. et Weaver W. (1949), The mathematical theory of communication, Urbana, Univ, Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s theory of sign, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1851, 1124–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uexküll J. Von. (1984), Mondes animaux et monde humain; suivi de Théorie de la signification, Paris, Denoël.Google Scholar