Article published In:
Information Design JournalVol. 25:3 (2019) ► pp.301–307
Designing animated information graphics
Challenges and opportunities
Animated graphics are a potentially powerful way to communicate information about subject matter involving change over time. However, their design currently relies largely on intuition and approaches applicable to static graphics. This article introduces a principled and empirically validated alternative that offers significantly better communicative effectiveness than conventional animation designs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Animation processing challenges
- 3.Exposing potential problems
- 4.Compositional design
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Groff, J., Boucheix, J. M., Lowe, R. K., Argon, S., Saby, L., Alauzet, A., & Paire-Ficout, L.
(2014) Don’t miss your train! Just follow the computer screen animation: Comprehension processes of animated public information graphics. Computers in Human Behavior, 301, 206–221. 
Lowe, R. K.
(2014) Dynamic visualizations: A two-edged sword? In W. Huang (Ed.), Handbook of human centric visualization (pp. 581–604). New York: Springer.
Lowe, R. K. & Boucheix, J.-M.
(2011) Cueing complex animation: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction, 21(5), 650–663.
Lowe, R. K. & Boucheix, J-M.
(2012) Dynamic diagrams: A composition alternative. In P. Cox, B. Plimmer, & P. Rogers (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 337–339). Berlin: Springer.
(2017) A composition approach to design of educational animations. In R. K. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization: Innovations in research and application (pp. 5–30). London: Routledge.
Schnotz, W. & Lowe, R. K.
(2008) A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 304–356) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe, J. M. & Horowitz, T. S.
(2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501.