Diagrams are increasingly used to present complex and abstract information. Their ultimate success as tools for communication depends largely upon how effectively they can be processed in the mind of the viewer. The application of established principles of graphic design is a vital part of developing effective diagrams, but tends to focus upon external aspects of representation that apply at a general level across a wide range of subject domains. However, the internal (mental) representation of a specific set of subject matter is also important in influencing what sense viewers make of a diagram. The task of characterising relationships between the way a diagram is represented mentally and the effectiveness with which that diagram is processed poses novel challenges to researchers. This paper decribes some of these challenges and discusses methodologies that have been developed to explore the mental representation and processing of explanatory diagrams.
2023. Visual Representation of the Internet Consumption in the European Union. In Artificial Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13988], ► pp. 244 ff.
Coleman, Julianne M., Erin M. McTigue & John A. Dantzler
2018. What Makes a Diagram Easy or Hard? The Impact of Diagram Design on Fourth-Grade Students’ Comprehension of Science Texts. The Elementary School Journal 119:1 ► pp. 122 ff.
Selvarajah, Geeta & Susila Selvarajah
2016. Model building to facilitate understanding of holliday junction and heteroduplex formation, and holliday junction resolution. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 44:4 ► pp. 381 ff.
Cartwright, William
2015. Rethinking the definition of the word ‘map’: an evaluation of Beck's representation of the London Underground through a qualitative expert survey. International Journal of Digital Earth 8:7 ► pp. 522 ff.
Eva Rolim Miranda
2015. Proceedings of the 7th Information Design International Conference, ► pp. 129 ff.
Linenberger, Kimberly J. & Stacey Lowery Bretz
2012. Generating cognitive dissonance in student interviews through multiple representations. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13:3 ► pp. 172 ff.
Linenberger, Kimberly J. & Stacey Lowery Bretz
2014. Biochemistry students' ideas about shape and charge in enzyme–substrate interactions. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 42:3 ► pp. 203 ff.
Linenberger, Kimberly J. & Stacey Lowery Bretz
2015. Biochemistry students' ideas about how an enzyme interacts with a substrate. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 43:4 ► pp. 213 ff.
Suthasupa, Supagtra
2012. The Portrayal of a City's Image by Young People. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 38 ► pp. 284 ff.
Schönborn, Konrad J. & Trevor R. Anderson
2006. The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists*. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 34:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
Blackwell, Alan F.
2002. Psychological Perspectives on Diagrams and their Users. In Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning, ► pp. 109 ff.
Postigo, Yolanda & Juan Ignacio Pozo
1998. The Learning of a Geographical Map by Experts and Novices. Educational Psychology 18:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Allmendinger, Leif
1994. Diagrams and design tools in context. ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation 18:4 ► pp. 25 ff.
Lowe, Richard K.
1993. Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram. Learning and Instruction 3:3 ► pp. 157 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.