Cover not available
Part of
Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact
Edited by Patrícia Amaral and Ana Maria Carvalho
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 151–174

The intonational phonology of Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese

 | University of Massachusetts at Amherst
 | University of Lisbon
The study of Spanish and Portuguese intonation within the Autosegmental Metrical (AM) framework has developed substantially over the past 30 years, and recent applications of common methodology make comparative studies more feasible. Here we compare the intonational systems of Peninsular Spanish (PS) and European Portuguese (EP), considering previous research on prosodic hierarchy, phrasing and tonal density. Finally, we compare the two tonal inventories and their respective (ToBI) labeling conventions. We find a considerable amount of overlap in terms of phonetic implementations of the tonal categories, showing, at times, labeling differences. We use this comparative analysis (i) to discuss these labeling differences and (ii) to motivate the need for uniform but also transparent labeling conventions in order to account for variation across Ibero-Romance varieties and as the field moves forward, Romance varieties.
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.1.09arm
References (86)
References
Aguilar, L., Carme de-la-Mota, & Prieto, P. (2009). Sp_ToBI. Training materials. [URL]Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. (2010). Puerto Rican Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp. 155–187). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Beckman, M., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J., & Morgan T. (2002). Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus 14, 9–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borràs-Comes, J., Vanrell, M., & Prieto, P. (2010). The role of pitch range in establishing intonational contrasts in Catalan. Speech Prosody, 100103, 1–4. Retrieved from <[URL]>Google Scholar
Cruz, M. (2013). Prosodic variation in EP: Phrasing, intonation and rhythm in central-southern varieties. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Cruz, M., & Frota, S. (2012). Para a prosódia do foco em variedades do Português Europeu. In A. Costa, C. Flores & N. Alexandre (Eds.), Textos Selecionados do XXVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, (pp. 196–216). Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
. (2013). On the relation between intonational phrasing and pitch accent distribution. Evidence from European Portuguese varieties. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (ISCA) - Interspeech 2013 , 300-304.Google Scholar
Dabkowski, M. (2012). Transcription of the intonation of Northeastern Brazilian Portuguese. Unpublished M. A. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
D’Imperio, M., Elordieta, G., Frota, S., Prieto, P., & Vigário, M. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituent length in Romance. In S. Frota, M. Vigário, & M.J. Freitas (Eds.), Prosodies (pp. 59–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Elordieta, G., Frota, S., Prieto, P., & Vigário, M. (2003). Effects of constituent length and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance. In M.J. Solé, D. Recasens & I. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 487–90). Bracelona: UAB.Google Scholar
Elordieta, G., Frota, S. & Vigário, M. (2005). Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica, 59, 110–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P. (2008). La notación prosódica del español: Una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 17, 265–283.Google Scholar
. (2009). La notación prosódica en español: Una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 18, 263–283.Google Scholar
. (2010). Castilian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp. 17–48). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Face, T.L. (2001). Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus 13, 223–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. (2003). Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 115–131.Google Scholar
. (2005). F0 peak height and the perception of sentence type in Castilian Spanish. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 2, 49–65.Google Scholar
. (2011). Perception of Castilian Spanish intonation: Implications for intonational phonology. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Face, T.L., & D’Imperio, M. (2005). Reconsidering a focal typology: Evidence from Spanish and Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 17, 271–289.Google Scholar
Face, T.L., & Prieto, P. (2007). Rising accents in Castilian Spanish: A revision of Sp_ToBI. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6, 117–146. Special issue on Prosody of Iberian Languages, G. Elordieta & M. Vigário (Eds.)Google Scholar
Fernandes-Svartman, F. (2007). Ordem, focalização e preenchimento em Português: sintaxe e prosódia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Falé, I. (1995). Fragmento da Prosódia do Português Europeu: As estruturas coordenadas. Unpublished M. A. Dissertation. Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (1993). On the prosody of focus in European Portuguese. Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonology, (pp. 45–66). Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
. (1995). Os domínios prosódicos e o Português Europeu: Fenómenos de sandhi. Actas do X Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, (pp. 221–237). Lisboa: APL/Colibri.Google Scholar
. (1998). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade de Lisboa. (Published in 2000, New York, NY: Garland).Google Scholar
. (2002a). Nuclear falls and rises in European Portuguese: A phonological analysis of declarative and question intonation. Probus, 14, 113–146. Special issue on intonation in Romance, J. I. Hualde (Ed.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002b). Tonal association and target alignment in European Portuguese nuclear falls. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology, 7, (pp. 387–418). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2003). The phonological status of initial peaks in European Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 133–152.Google Scholar
. (2014). The intonational phonology of European Portuguese. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology II, (pp. 6–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., & Vigário, M. (2000). Aspectos de prosódia comparada: Ritmo e entoação no PE e no PB. In R.V. Castro & P. Barbosa (Eds.), Actas do XV Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (Vol. I; pp. 533–555). Coimbra: APL.Google Scholar
. (2007). Intonational phrasing in two varieties of European Portuguese. In T. Riad & C. Gussenhoven (Eds.), Tones and tunes (Vol. I; pp. 265–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frota, S., D’Imperio, M., Elordieta, G., Prieto, P., & Vigário, M. (2007). The phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in Romance. In P. Prieto, J. Mascaró, & M.J. Solé (Eds.), Prosodic and segmental issues in (Romance) phonology (pp. 131–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., Cruz, M., Fernandes-Svartman, F., Vigário, M., Collischonn, G., Fonseca, A., Serra, C., & Schwindt, L. (2011). Portuguese: Labelling intonational variation across varieties of European and Brazilian Portuguese. Talk presented at the Workshop on Romance ToBI, in PaPI – Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.Google Scholar
Frota, S., & Cruz, M. (Coord.) (2012–2014). InAPoP – Interactive atlas of the prosody of Portuguese. [URL]Google Scholar
Frota, S., & Prieto, P. (Eds.). (In press). Intonational variation in Romance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Cruz, M., Fernandes-Svartman, F., Vigário, M., Collischonn, G., Fonseca, A., & Serra, C. (In press). Intonational variation in Portuguese: European and Brazilian varieties. In S. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonational variation in Romance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B., & Lahiri A. (1991). Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, 47–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellmuth, S. (2004). Prosodic weight and phonological phrasing in Cairene Arabic. Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: The Main Session, 97–111.Google Scholar
. (2007). The relationship between prosodic structure and pitch accent distribution: evidence from Egyptian Arabic. The Linguistic Review, 24(2), 289–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henricksen, N., & García-Amaya, L. (2012). Transcription of intonation of Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. Estudios de Fonética, 21, 109–162.Google Scholar
Hualde, J.I. (2002). Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages: Overview and status quaestionis. In C. Wiltshire & J. Camps (Eds.), Romance phonology and variation. Selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 101–115). Gainesville, FL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). El modelo métrico y autosegmental. In P. Prieto (Ed.), Teorías de la entonación (pp. 155–184). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Hualde, J.I., & Prieto, P. (In press). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In S. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonational variation in Romance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jun, S.A. (2005). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(21), 49–69.Google Scholar
Ladd, D.R. (1993). Constraints of the gradient variability of pitch range (or) Pitch level 4 lives! In P. Keating (Ed.), Papers on Laboratory Phonology III (pp. 43–63). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. (1996). Intonational phonology. (2nd ed., 2008). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
López-Bobo, M.J., & Cuevas-Alonso, M. (2010). Cantabrian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp. 49–86). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1918). Manual de pronunciación española. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Históricos.Google Scholar
. (1939). El grupo fónico como unidad melódica. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 1, 3–19.Google Scholar
. (1944). Manual de entonación española. New York, NY: Hispanic Institute in the United States.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. (2nd ed., 2007). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (1989). On clashes and lapses. Phonology, 6, 69–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nibert, H.J. (1999). A perception study of intermediate phrasing in Spanish intonation. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (Vol. I; pp. 231–247). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. (2000). Phonetic and phonological evidence for intermediate phrasing in Spanish intonation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Post, B. (2000). Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (1998). The scaling of the L tone line in Spanish downstepping contours. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 261–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). L’ entonació dialectal del català: el cas de les frases interrogatives absolutes. Actes del Nové Col.loqui d’Estudis Catalans a Nord-Amèrica, A. Bover, M.-R. Lloret & M. Vidal-Tibbits (pp. 347–377). Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Nibert, H.J., & Shih, C. (1995). Effects of phrasal length and time distance between peaks on peak height in Mexican Spanish. Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. II, 730–734).Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Shih, C., & Nibert, H.J. (1996). Pitch downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 445–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P., D’Imperio, M., & Gili-Fivela, B. (2005). Pitch accent alignment in Romance: Primary and secondary associations with metrical structure. Language and Speech 48(4), 359–396. Special issue on Variation in Intonation, P. Warren (Ed.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P., & Sichel-Bazin, R. (Coord.) (2007). Atlàs interactiu de l’intonacion de l’occitan. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Prieto, P., & Cabré, T. (Eds.) (2007–2012). Atles interactiu de l’entonació del català. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Prieto, P., & Roseano, P. (Eds.) (2009–2010). Atlas interactivo de la entonación del español. <[URL]>Google Scholar
. (Eds.) (2010). Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Borràs-Comes, J., &Roseano, P. (Eds.) (2010–2014). IARI - Interactive atlas of Romance intonation. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Roseano, P., Vanrell, M. & Prieto, P. (2011). Fri_ToBI. Paper presented at the Workshop on Romance ToBI. Retrieved from <[URL]>Google Scholar
Sandalo, F., & Truckenbrodt, H. (2002). Some notes on phonological phrasing in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 42, 285–310.Google Scholar
Savino, M., & Grice, M. (2007). The role of pitch range in realising pragmatic contrasts – the case of two question types in Italian. In J. Trouvain & W. Berry (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1037–1040). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.Google Scholar
. (2011). The perception of negative bias in Bari Italian questions. In S. Frota, P. Prieto & G. Elordieta (Eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sosa, J.M. (1991). Fonética y fonología de la entonación del español hispanoamericano. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Massachussets at Amherst.Google Scholar
. (1999). La entonación del español. Su estructura fónica, variabilidad y dialectología. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.Google Scholar
Tenani, L.E. (2002). Domínios prosódicos no Português do Brasil: implicações para a prosódia e para a aplicação de processos fonológicos. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of Campinas.Google Scholar
Trager, G.L., & Smith, H.L. (1951). An outline of English structure. Norman, OK: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Vanrell, M. (2011). The phonological relevance of tonal scaling in the intonational grammar of Catalan. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Viana, M. (1987). Para a síntese da entoação do Português. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, CLUL-INIC, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Viana, M., & Frota, S. (Coord.) (2007). Towards a P_ToBI. [URL]Google Scholar
Vigário, M. (1995). Aspectos da Prosódia do Português Europeu: Estruturas com advérbio de exclusão e negação frásica. M. A. Dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa (Published in 1998, Braga: Universidade do Minho/CEHUM).Google Scholar
. (2003). The prosodic word in European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M., & Frota, S. (2003). The intonation of Standard and Northern European Portuguese: A comparative intonational phonology approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2(2), 115–137. Special issue on Portuguese Phonology, L. Wetzels (Ed.).Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.