Cover not available
Part of
Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact
Edited by Patrícia Amaral and Ana Maria Carvalho
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 175–202

Similar and differing patterns of allomorphy in the Spanish and Portuguese verbs

| University of Sheffield
This chapter focuses on the different patterns of stem allomorphy in the Spanish and Portuguese verbs and the best way to capture these patterns. It presents synchronic and diachronic evidence along with theoretical arguments to claim that the present tense system of both languages is organized around a number of purely morphological structures, or morphomes (in the sense of Maiden, 2005; inspired by Aronoff, 1994); sets of paradigmatic cells which share a common form but no coherent grammatical/semantic property. The allomorphy in these morphomes cannot be derived in terms of phonology or semantics, but by simple morphological stipulation. This conclusion lends support to the need for a morphomic level in the grammar, one that is intermediate between form and meaning.
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.1.10one
References (75)
References
Alarcos Llorach, E. (1994). Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Alcoba, S. (1999). La flexión verbal. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 3; pp. 4915–4991). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aski, J.M. (1995). Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French and Spanish to go. Linguistics, 33, 403–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, W.J. (1979). On the draining of the conceptual swamp. In G.D. Prideaux (eds), Perspectives in experimental linguistics (pp. 141–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bello, A. (1908). Gramática de la lengua castellana. Buenos Aires: Sopena.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2013). The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1): 3–103.Google Scholar
Black, M., & Chiat, S. (1981). Psycholinguistics without ‘psychological reality’. Linguistics, 19, 37–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botha, R.P. (1971). Methodological aspects of transformational generative phonology. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (2004). Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in Italian verbal inflection. In J. Auger, J.C. Clements, & B. Vance (eds), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, J., & Benjamin, C. (2004). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Pardo, E. (1981). On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: A nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics, 19, 937–968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreira, M. (1991). The alternating diphthongs of Spanish: A paradox resolved. In H. Campos, & F. Martínez-Gil (eds), Current studies in Spanish linguistics (pp. 407–445). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2007). Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language, 87, 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunha, C., & Lindley Cintra, L. (1994). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Lisbon: Ed. Sáda Costa.Google Scholar
Derwig, D.L. (1979). Review of R. Botha, The justification of linguistic hypotheses. Journal of Linguistics, 15, 341–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, B.L., Prideaux, G.D., & Baker, W.J. (1980). Experimental linguistics in historical perspective. In G.D. Prideaux, B.L. Derwing, & W.J. Baker (Eds.), Experimental linguistics (pp. 1–13). Ghent, Belgium: E. Story-Scientia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. (2006). Introduction: Natural morphology. Folia Linguistica, 40, 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1928). A grammar of the Portuguese language. Washington, DC: National Capital Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2004). Spanish phonology and morphology: Experimental and quantitative perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Bellido, P. (1986). Lexical diphthongization and high-mid alternations in Spanish: An autosegmental account. Linguistic Analysis, 16, 61–92.Google Scholar
Goyvaerts, D.L. (1978). Aspects of post-SPE phonology. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia.Google Scholar
Fondow, S. (2010). Spanish velar-insertion and analogy. A usage-based diachronic analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University. Available at[URL]Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1977). Remarks on diphthongization in Spanish. Lingua, 41, 261–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1978). Two theories of non-automatic morphophonological alternations. Language, 54, 41–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1985). Spanish diphthongization and stress: A paradox resolved. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J. (1991). Remarks on the metaphysics of linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 555–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hills, E.C., Ford J.D., & Coutinho, J. (1925). A Portuguese grammar. New York, NY: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A., & Lloyd, J. (1996). Portuguese: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1978). Grammatical theory and metascience. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). On generative taxonomy and whether formalisms ‘explain’. Studia Linguistica, 30, 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1974). New problems in Romance interfixation. Romance Philology, 27, 304–355.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (1992). Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Di nuovo sulle alternanze velari nel verbo italiano e spagnolo. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 8, 39–61.Google Scholar
. (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004 137–175.Google Scholar
. (2009). From pure phonology to pure morphology: The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 38, 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Morphomes and ‘stress- conditioned allomorphy’ in Romansh. In M. Maiden, J.C. Smith, M. Goldbach, & M-O. Hinzelin (Eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology (pp. 36–51) Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M., & O’Neill, P. (2010). Morphomic Defectiveness. In M. ,Baerman, G. Corbett, & D. Brown (Eds.), Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us (pp. 103–124). London: OUP/British Academy. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1966). Dipthongization, monophthongization, metaphony: Studies in their interaction in the paradigm of the Old Spanish -ir verbs. Language, 42, 430–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1974). New problems in Romance interfixation. Romance Philology, 27, 304–355.Google Scholar
Martín Vegas, A.R. (2007). Morfofonología histórica del español: Estudio de las alternancias /jé/ - /e/, /wé/ - /o/ y /Ø/ - /g/. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Mateo, F., & Rojo Sastre, A.J. (1995). Bescherelle: El arte de conjugar en español. Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1941, 1949). Manual de gramática histórica española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Morin, Y.C. (1988). Morphological conditioning in phonologically transparent processes: evidence from the evolution of vowel reduction in Vinzelles Occitan. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 33, 431–442.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1990). There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: A personal view. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 153–171.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2009). Los verbos defectivos en la lengua española: Estudio sincrónico y diacrónico descriptivo basado en datos de corpus. Boletín de la Real Academia Española, 255–287.Google Scholar
. (2010). Una explicación teórica de la defectividad verbal en la lengua española. Boletín de la Real Academia Española.Google Scholar
. (2011). The Ibero-Romance verb: Allomorphy and the notion of the morphome. Unpublished DPhil Dissertation. University of Oxford. Available online at <[URL]>Google Scholar
(2011b). Alternancias vocálicas en el presente de los verbos en -ir. Un análisis desde la Morfología Autónoma. Revista de la Historia de la Lengua Española, 6, 87–129.Google Scholar
. (2012). New perspectives on the effects of yod in Ibero-Romance. Bulletin of Spanish Studies: Hispanic Studies and Researches on Spain, Portugal and Latin America, 89(5), 665–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Los verbos defectivos en la lengua española: Estudio sincrónico y diacrónico descriptivo basado en datos de corpus. Boletín de la Real Academia Española, 255–287.Google Scholar
. (2010). Una explicación teórica de la defectividad verbal en la lengua española. Boletín de la Real Academia Española.Google Scholar
. (Under consideration (a)). Diphthongisation and stress in the Spanish verb: Examples of morphological conditioning. Available online at <[URL]>
. (Under consideration (b)). Velar allomorphy in the Spanish verb: Phonologically or morphologically conditioned allomorphy? Available online at <[URL]>
. (in press). The origin and spread of velar allomorphy in the Spanish verb. Available online at <[URL]>
Penny, R. (2002). A history of the Spanish language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perini, M. (2002) Modern Portuguese: A reference grammar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., Beckman, M., & Ladd, D.R. (2000). Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr, & G. Docherty (Eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues (pp. 273–303). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. (1968). Theories, experience, and probabilistic intuitions. In I. Lakatos (Ed.), The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española y la Asociación de Academias de la Lengua. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid, Espasa.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. (1973). Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Roca, I. (1990). Morphology and verbal stress in Spanish. Probus, 2(3), 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sá Nogueira, R. 1945. Dicionário de verbos portugueses conjugados . Lisbon: Livrariaclássica.Google Scholar
Salvá, V. (1830). Gramática de la lengua castellana. Paris: Librería de V. Salvá.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (2001). Empirical linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schuldberg, H.K. (1984). Diphthongization in Spanish verbs. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 215–228.Google Scholar
Seco, M. (1989). Gramática esencial del español: Introducción al estudio de la lengua. Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Silva, E. (1977). Dicionario dos verbos portugueses. Porto Editora.Google Scholar
Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
St. Clair, R., & Park, C. (1974). The irregular present tense verbs of Spanish. >Linguistics, 73–100.Google Scholar
Vázquez Cuesta, P., & Mendes da Luz, M.A. (1971). Gramática portuguesa, II: Morfología. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Veríssimo, J., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugation. Cognition, 112, 187–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1975). The strategy of generative phonology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, & F.V. Marks (Eds.), Phonologica 1972 (pp. 151–165). Salzburg: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
. (1980). Internal and external evidence in linguistics. Philosophy of Science Association. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 598–604.Google Scholar