Part of
Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From theory to empirical evidenceEdited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 21–38
Edited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 21–38
Towards a theory of pronominal verb constructions in Spanish
This paper proposes a unified account of three types of constructions in which the se clitic appears, which are dubbed pronominal verb constructions (PVCs) . unaccusatives like acatarrar-se (get sick), unergatives like quejar-se (complain) and transitives like zampar-se algo (to wolf something down). The main claims are (i) that the verbs in question represent classes that are specified to select a “defective” head (= a head that does not introduce a theta role and/or assign case) in their predicate-argument argument structure and (ii) Spanish marks such defective heads as [ϕ], a diacritic that triggers insertion of se post-syntactically at T. The different classes of PVCs are derived from the type of defective head that is selected, Voice[ϕ] in the case of intransitives and P[ϕ] in the case of transitives.
Keywords: Agreement, Argument structure, Pronominal verbs
References (26)
Abels, K. (2003). Successive cyclicity, anti-locality and adposition stranding. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut.
Basilico, D. (2010). The se clitic and its relationship to paths. Probus, 22, 271–302. 
Bowers, J. (2010). Arguments as relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
. (1991). The morphological basis of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics, 2, 81–105.
Campanini, C., & Schäfer, F. (2011). Optional se-constructions in Romance: Syntactic encoding of conceptual information. Handout from talk given at
GLOW 34
, Universität Wien.
Campos, H., & Kempchinsky, P. (1991). Case absorption, theta structure and pronominal verbs. In D. Wanner & D. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 171–185). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Coon, J. (2013). Aspects of split ergativity. Oxford: OUP.
Cuervo, M.C. (2003). Datives at large. Unpublished PhD dissertation. MIT.
De Miguel, E., & Fernández Lagunilla, M. (2000). El operador aspectual se
. Revista Española de Lingüística, 30, 13–41.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (2006). The se anaphor and its role in argument realization. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (Vol. 4; pp. 118–179). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hale, K., & Keyser, S.J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kayne, R. (2000). Parameters and universals. Oxford: OUP.
MacDonald, J.E. (2004). Spanish reflexive pronouns: A null preposition hypothesis. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), WCCFL 23 Proceedings (pp. 528–540). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
. (2016). Spanish aspectual se as an indirect object reflexive: The import of atelicity, bare nouns and leísta PCC repair.
To appear in Probus.
Masullo, P.J. (1992a). Incorporation and case theory in Spanish: A cross linguistic perspective. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Washington.
. (1992b). Antipassive constructions in Spanish. In P. Hirschbühler & K. Koerner (Eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, (pp. 175–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mendikoetxea, A. (2008). Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. Transactions of the philological society, 106(2), 290–336
Pujalte, M., & Saab, A. (2012). Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertion in Spanish. In M.C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge (Eds.), The end of argument structure? (pp. 229–260) Bingley: Emerald Press.
Rezac, M. (2008). Phi-agree and theta-related case. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Bejar (Eds.), Phi theory: Phi features across the interfaces and modules (pp. 83–129). Oxford: OUP.
Sanz, M. (2000). Events and predication: A new approach to syntactic processing in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sigurðsson, H.A. (2012). Minimalist C/Case. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 191–227.
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya, & G. Spathas (Eds.), Argument structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.