Cover not available
Part of
Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence
Edited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 131–148

The mestizo speech

Participant selection and task choice in L2 speech

 | University of Toronto
The goal of this chapter is to reflect on methodological practices in second language (L2) speech concerning participant selection and task choices. To frame the discussion, I turn to two central issues in cultural studies: the concept of mestizaje and the connection between speech and writing. First, drawing from research on L2 acquisition of intonation, I argue for the need of problematizing multilingual identities to include populations that currently do not fit our selection criteria. Secondly, I suggest that the discussion about the centrality of alphabetic writing in Western societies can inform research on the role of reading and writing in L2 and bilingual speech.
Keywords: Multilingualism, Second language methodology, Task choices
Published online: 1 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.12.08col
References (51)
References
Acosta, J. de. (2002). Historia natural y moral de las Indias. (J. Alcina Franch, Ed.). Madrid: Datin Historia (Original work published in 1588/1590). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S. (2014). The use of native speaker norms in the critical period hypothesis research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 565–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. (2014). Effects of variability in fundamental frequency on L2 vocabulary learning: A comparison between learners who do and do not speak a tone language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 423–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartels, C. (1997). Towards a compositional interpretation of English statement and question intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2007). Effects of Hanyu Pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In A. Guder, X. Jiang, & Y. Wan (Eds.), The cognition, learning and teaching of Chinese characters (pp. 156–179). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2006). Native-like attainment in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop-liquid clusters. In C .A. Klee & T.L. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 59–73). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Steele, J. (2007). Acquiring /R/ in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 381–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2008). Integrating articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 489–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L, Cuza, A., & Mazzaro, N. (2016). Task-related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. In M. Armstrong, N. Henriksen, & M. Vanrell (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second language speech. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Colón, Cristóbal. (1986). Los cuatro viajes. Testamento. (C. Varela, Ed.). Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2007). The goals of ELT: Reproducing native-speakers or promoting multi-competence among second language users? In C. Davison & J. Cummins (Eds.), Kluwer handbook on English language teaching (pp. 237–48). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in an L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 451–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. (G. Chakravorty Spivak, Trans.). Maryland: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. (Original work published in 1967).Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durgunoglu, A.Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (2007). Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdener, V.D., & Burnham, D.K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in non-native speech production. Language Learning, 55(2), 191–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forstescue, M. (1984). West Greenlandic. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frost, R., & Ziegler, C. (2007). Speech and spelling interaction: The interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition. In G. Gaskel (Ed.). The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 107–117). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Rosner, B., García-Albea, J., & Zhou, X. (2003). Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech, 46, 375–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruzinski, S. (2002). The mestizo mind. (D. Dusinberre, Trans.) New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published in 1999).Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2011). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. (2010). Eskimo-Aleut languages. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 1041–1055. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Geeslin, K. (2014). The interpretation of Spanish subjunctive and indicative forms in adverbial clauses: A cross-sectional study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 487–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. (1989). The global village. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mazzaro, N., Cuza, A., & Colantoni, L. (2016). Age effects and the discrimination of consonantal and vocalic contrasts in heritage and native Spanish. In C. Tortora, M. den Dikken, I. Montoya, & T. O’Neill (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 43th Linguistic symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 277–300).Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2003). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 711–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologization of the word. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2010). The bilingual turn in SLA . Plenary delivered at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics . Atlanta, GA, March 6-9.
Ortega Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L. (2014). L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning and L1 transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 331–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A., Castilla, A., & Brunner, J. (2012). General and specific effects of lexicon in grammar: Determiner and object pronoun omissions in child Spanish. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55, 313–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rafat, Y. (2015). The interaction of acoustic and orthographic input in the acquisition of Spanish assibilated/fricative rhotics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 43–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, R. (2013). Manifestations of /b, d, g/ in two groups of heritage speakers of Spanish . Paper presented at the 2012 UIC Bilingualism Forum. University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, October 2012.
Reichle, R., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Processing focus structure in L1 and L2 French: L2 proficiency effects in ERPs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 535–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Scarone, P., Gatignol, P., Guillaume, S., Denvil, D., Capelle, L., & Duffau, H. (2009). Agraphia after awake surgery for brain tumor: New insights into the anatomo-functional network of writing. Surgical Neurology, 72, 233–241 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shokeir, V. (2009). Intonation in Inuktitut. Ms. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Sosa, J.M. (1999). La entonación del español. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2011). Linguistic characteristics of Canadians, Document Catalogue no. 98-314-X2011001.Google Scholar
Steele, J. (2005, June). Assessing the role of orthographic versus uniquely auditory input in acquiring new L2 segments . Paper presented at the 7èmes recontre internationals du réseau français de phonologie, Aix-en Provence, France.
Todorov, T. (1984). The conquest of America: The question of the other. (R. Howard, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row (Original work published in 1982).Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. (2014). Aspects of meaning in bilingual minds . Paper presented at the Jackman Humanities Institute Lecture Series. Toronto, February 7.
Vega, Inca Garcilaso de la. (1985). Comentarios reales. (A.M. Quesada, Ed.). Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho. (Original work published in 1609). Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M., Akita, M., & Cross, N. (1999). Focus on form in phonology: orthographic exposure as a promoter of epenthesis. In P. Robinson & N.O. Jungheim (Eds.), Pragmatics and pedagogy: Proceedings of the Third PacSLRF (vol. 2, pp. 226–234). Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin University.Google Scholar