Chapter 6
The Compounding Parameter and L2 acquisition
This chapter investigates the L2 acquisition of the cluster of structures related to the positive setting of the Compounding Parameter (TCP: nominal compounding (N+N), resultative structures (RS), verb+particle constructions (V+PRT), double object constructions (DOC), and preposition stranding (PrepStr)) in the development of the interlanguage of Brazilian learners of English. Since Brazilian Portuguese (BP) has the negative setting of TCP, the possible acquisition of the cluster in this context may serve as evidence for poverty of the stimulus effects in L2 acquisition. Two groups of Brazilian learners of English, one intermediate and one advanced, were tested and compared. The results suggest that the acquisition of [+]TCP-related cluster of structures by the advanced group as well as their developing knowledge by the intermediate group might be indicative of access to UG.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Compounding Parameter
- 2.1A cluster of five structures
- 2.2The Compounding Parameter in L2
- 3.The Compounding Parameter in the acquisition of English by Brazilian learners
- 4.The Experiment
- 5.Results
-
6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (43)
Bley-Vroman, R.
(
1983)
The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity.
Language Learning, 33, 1–17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bley-Vroman, R.
(
1990)
The logical problem of foreign language learning.
Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N.
(
1981)
Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Anderson, B.
(
1997)
The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: The process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars.
Language Acquisition, 6, 297–332.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Swanson, K.
(
2001)
Reflexes of mental architecture in second-language acquisition: The interpretation of discontinuous combien extractions in English-French interlanguage.
Language Acquisition, 9, 175–227.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Depiante, M.
(
2000)
The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping/bare argument ellipsis. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J.
(
1993)
On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In
K. Hale &
S. J. Keyser (Eds.),
The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, T.
(
1988)
Small clause results.
Lingua, 74, 101–139.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyams, N.
(
1986)
Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanno, K.
(
1997)
The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers.
Second Language Research, 14, 376–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanno, K.
(
1998)
The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese.
Linguistics, 36, 1125–1146.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kato, M.
(
2005)
A gramática do letrado: Questões para a teoria gramatical. In
M. A. Marques,
E. Koller,
J. Teixeira, &
A. S. Lemos (Eds.),
Ciências da linguagem: Trinta anos de investigação e ensino (pp.131–145). Braga: CEHUM /U. do Minho.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, R.
(
1984)
Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larson, R.
(
1988)
On the double object construction.
Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liceras, J.
(
1989)
On some properties of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In
S. Gass &
J. Schachter (Eds.),
Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liceras, J., & Valenzuela, E.
(
1998)
The compounding parameter in L2 acquisition: The subset principle revisited. Paper presented at
GASLA 1998
, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh,
September.
Liceras, J., & Díaz, L.
(
2000)
Triggers in L2 acquisition.
Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 197–211.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobato, L.
(
2004)
Afinal, existe a construção resultativa em português? In
L. Negri,
M. J. Foltran &
R. Pires de Oliveira (Eds.),
Sentido e significação (pp.142–179). São Paulo: Contexto.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcelino, M.
(
2007)
O parâmetro de composição e a aquisição/aprendizagem de L2. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcelino, M.
(
2014)
Resultativas em português brasileiro.
Veredas Online – Sintaxe das Línguas Brasileiras, 18(1), 121–137.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDaniel, D., Mckee, C., & Cairns, H.
(
1996)
Methods for assessing children’s syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(
2003)
Defining and measuring SLA. In
C. Doughty &
M. Long (Eds.),
The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oliveira, C. S. F., & Marcelino, M.
(
2014)
A construção resultativa verdadeira em português brasileiro.
Confluência, 47(2), 120–138.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salles, H. M.
(
1997)
Prepositions and the syntax of complementation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, J.
(
1988)
Second language acquisition and its relationship with Universal Grammar.
Applied Linguistics, 9, 219–235.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scher, A. P.
(
1996)
As construções com dois complementos no Inglês e no Português do Brasil: Um estudo sintático comparativo. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(
1996)
L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model.
Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(
2000)
When syntactic theories evolve: Consequences for L2 acquisition research. In
J. Archibald (Ed.),
Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–187). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(
2013)
Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. In
J. Herschensohn, &
M. Young-Scholten, (Eds.),
The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 137–158). Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slabakova, R.
(
2002)
The compounding parameter in second language acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 507–540.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slabakova, R.
(
2008)
Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W.
(
1995)
Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W., & Stromswold, K.
(
1997)
The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions.
Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 281–317.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W.
(
2000)
On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.
Language, 77, 324–342.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W.
(
2001)
On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.
Language, 77, 324–342.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W.
(
2012)
Parameter theory and motion predicates. In
V. Demonte &
L. McNally (Eds.),
Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure (OSTL 39) (pp. 279–299). Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, W., & Sugisaki, K.
(
2002)
Preposition stranding and the compounding parameter: A developmental perspective. In
B. Skarabela,
S. Fish &
A. H.-J. Do (Eds.), BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Annual Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2; pp. 677–688). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
White, L.
(
1985)
The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition.
Language Learning, 35, 47–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L.
(
2003)
Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.