Cover not available
Part of
Studies on Variation in Portuguese
Edited by Pilar Barbosa, Maria da Conceição de Paiva and Celeste Rodrigues
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14] 2017
► pp. 219–232

Chapter 9
Linguistic and social embedding of variable concord with 1st plural nós ‘we’ in Brazilian Portuguese

 | Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
 | Federal University of Espírito Santo Vitoria, BrazilUniversity of Brasília, Brazil
 | Departement of Education of State of Espírito Santo, Brazil
 | Departement of Education of State of Espírito Santo, Brazil
In vernacular Brazilian Portuguese, use of 1st plural desinence -mos with nós ‘we’ is variable, although it is categorical in European Portuguese and very frequent in highly educated speakers in Brazil. Its absence is stigmatized in the urban context as an indication that the speaker ‘does not know how to speak Portuguese’. This phenomenon exhibits vigorous constraints and is subject to intricate structural conditioning based on tense and paradigmatic relationships, our main point. The most robust social effect is level of education. We analyze three samples and show that underlying this stigmatized morphosyntactic phenomenon there are effects on the functional level (tense distinctions), the cognitive level (marking of more easily perceptible forms), and the structural level (maintenance of phonological pattern).
Keywords: Brazilian Portuguese, variable concord, 1st plural nós ‘we’, linguistic embedding
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodological and theoretical aspects
  • 3.Analysis and discussion
  • 4.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.14.09nar
References (36)
References
Amaral, M. P. do. (2002). A síncope das proparoxítonas: Uma regra variável. In L. Bisol & C. Brescancini (Eds.), Fonologia e variação: Recortes do Português Brasileiro (pp. 99–126). Porto Alegre: DIPUCRS.Google Scholar
Araujo, S. S. de F. (2012). A concordância verbal e sua importância para os estudos sobre a formação do Português Brasileiro. Papia, 22(1), 91–110.Google Scholar
Benfica, S. de A. (2016). A concordância verbal na fala de Vitória. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brasil. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Benfica, S. de A., & Scherre, M. M. P. (2013). Os “nós” da concordância verbal na fala capixaba. Paper presented at II Congresso Nacional de Estudos Linguísticos, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, October 24–25.
Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (1985). The urbanization of rural dialect speakers – A sociolinguistic study in Brazil. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(2011). Do campo para a cidade – Estudo sociolinguístico de migração e redes sociais. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Cardoso, C. R. (2005). Concordância verbal no indivíduo: Um confronto entre o linguístico e o estilístico. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Coelho, R. F. (2006). É nóis na fita! Duas variáveis linguísticas numa vizinhança da periferia paulistana (O pronome de primeira pessoa do plural e a marcação de plural no verbo). (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Dettoni, R. do V. (2003). A concordância de gênero na anáfora pronominal: Variação e mudança linguística no dialeto da Baixada Cuiabana – Mato Grosso. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Brasília. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Foeger, C. C. (2014). A primeira pessoa do plural no português falado em Santa Leopoldina. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brasil. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change, Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001). Principles of linguistic change, Volume II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2006 [1966]). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: CUP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucchesi, D., Baxter, A., & Silva, J. A. A. da. (2009). A concordância verbal. In D. Lucchesi, A. Baxter, & I. Ribeiro (Eds.), O Português Afro-brasileiro (pp. 331–371). Salvador: Editora da Universidade Federal da Bahia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matos, D. A. F. (2014). O preconceito linguístico no ciberespaço: A discriminação, os agentes e as especificidades. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brasil. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mattos, S. E. R. (2013). Goiás na primeira pessoa do plural. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Brasília. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mendes, R. B., & Oushiro, L. (2015). Variable number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: An overview. Language and Linguistic Compass, 9(9), 358–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendonça, A. K. (2010). Nós e a gente em Vitória: Análise sociolinguística da fala capixaba (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brasil. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Naro, A. J. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language, 57(1), 63–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naro, A. J., Gӧrski, E., & Fernandes, E. (1999). Change without change. Language Variation and Change, 11(2), 197–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naro, A. J., Scherre, M. M. P. (2013). Remodeling the age variable: Number concord in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change, 25(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Drifting toward the standard language: A panel study of number concord in Brazilian Portuguese. In R. T. Cacoullos, N. Dion & A. Lapierre (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Confronting fact and theory (pp. 149–194). New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oushiro, L. (2015). Identidade na pluralidade – Avaliação, produção e percepção na cidade de São Paulo. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved from <[URL]> DOI logo
Prandi, M. R. (2005). Concordância verbal no ensino fundamental: Traços sociolinguísticos na fronteira Brasil-Paraguai (Unpublished master’s thesis), Universidade de Brasília. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Rodrigues, A. C. S. (2007). Concordância verbal, sociolinguística e história do português brasileiro. Fórum linguístico, 4(1), 115–145.Google Scholar
Rubio, C. F. (2012). Padrões de concordância verbal e alternância pronominal no português brasileiro e português europeu: Um estudo comparativo. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988a). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey IV: Language: The socio-cultural context (pp.141–160). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1988b). Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar & K. J. Mattheir (Eds.), Sociolinguistics – An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 984–998). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S., & Smith, E. (2005). Goldvarb X – A multivariate analysis application. Toronto: Department of Linguistics; Ottawa: Department of Mathematics. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Scherre, M. M. P., & Duarte, M. E. L. (2016). Main current processes of morphosyntactic variation. In L. Wetzels, S. Mennuzi, & J. Costa (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 526–544). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M. M. P., & Naro, A. J. (2010). Perceptual vs. grammatical constraints and social factors in subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese. Penn working papers in Linguistics – Selected papers from NWAV 38, 16(2), 165–171.Google Scholar
(2014). Sociolinguistic correlates of negative evaluation: Variable concord in Rio de Janeiro. Language Variation and Change, 26(3), 331–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalva, A. (2003). Estrutura morfológica básica. In M. H. Mira Mateus, A. M. Brito, I. Duarte, I. H. Faria, S. Frota, … A. Villalva (Eds.), Gramática da língua portuguesa (pp.918–938). Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.Google Scholar
Zilles, A. M S., Maya, L, Z., & Silva, K. Q. (2000). A concordância verbal com a primeira pessoa do plural. Organon, 14(28–29), 195–219.Google Scholar
Weinreich, R., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics (pp. 97–155). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Yacovenco, L. C., Scherre, M. M. P., Tesch, L. M., Bragança, M. L., Evangelista, E. M., Mendonça … Benfica, S. de A. (2012). Projeto PortVix: A fala de Vitória em cena. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 56, 771–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bongiovanni, Silvina
2022. A case for velarization of Spanish word-internal coda stops as hypercorrection. Spanish in Context 19:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Pereira Scherre, Maria Marta, Lilian Coutinho Yacovenco & Anthony Julius Naro
2018. <em>Nós</em> e <em>a gente</em> no português brasileiro: concordâncias e discordâncias. Estudos de Lingüística Galega ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.