Cover not available
Part of
Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015
Edited by Jonathan E. MacDonald
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15] 2018
► pp. 11–30

Chapter 1
se-marked directed motion constructions

Anticausatives and figure reflexives

 | University of Wisconsin-Madison
This paper discusses the descriptive properties of se-marked directed motion constructions typically instantiated by verbs such as caer-se (fall-se), ir-se (go-se) or subir-se (go up-se). I argue that such constructions are surface representations of two distinct underlying syntactic configurations: an anticausative (Schäfer, 2008) and a figure reflexive (Wood, 2014). The anticausative analysis corroborates work on the same topic by Cuervo (2014), Jiménez-Fernández & Tubino (2014) and Pineda (2016) while the figure reflexive analysis is a novel contribution.
Keywords: se clitic, directed motion verbs, anticausatives, figure reflexives
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Descriptive properties of se with intransitive motion verbs
    • 2.1Directed motion
    • 2.2Culmination
    • 2.3Other restrictions: Agentivity and permanence
  • 3.On the connection between marked anticausatives and directed motion constructions
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Anticausatives and intrinsic reflexives
    • 4.2Figure reflexives
    • 4.3 se-marked directed motion verbs
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.15.02arm
References (37)
References
Armstrong, G. (2013). Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive se constructions in Spanish. Borealis, 2(2), 81–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basilico, D. (2010). The se clitic and its relationship to paths. Probus, 22, 271–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogard, S. (2006). El clítico se. Valores y evolución. In C. Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española (Vol. 2, pp. 755–866). Mexico City: UNAM/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2005). The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. (2015). Inner and outer prepositions with Spanish verbs of vertical movement. In E. Barrajón, J. Cifuentes, & S. Rodríguez (Eds.), Verb Classes and Aspect (pp. 77–97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Datives at large. Unpublished PhD dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
(2014). Alternating unaccusatives and distribution of roots. Lingua, 141, 48–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, G. (2006). La estructura léxica de la resultatividad y su expresión en las lenguas germánicas y románicas. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E. (1999). El aspecto léxico. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte Gramática descriptive de la lengua Española (Vol. 2, pp. 2977–3060). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E., & Fernández Lagunilla, M. (2000). El operador aspectual se . Revista Española de Lingüística, 30, 13–41.Google Scholar
Gallardo, E. (2008). Estrategias de inacusatividad en inglés, japonés y lenguas románicas. In A. Moreno Sandoval (Ed.), Actas del VIII Congreso de Lingüística General (pp. 747–762). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
García Fernández, L. (2015). Some reflections on verbs with clitic increase: Verbs of motion. In E. Barrajón, J. Cifuentes, & S. Rodríguez (eds), Verb Classes and Aspect (pp. 264–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, B. (2008). Ps in motion. On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events (LOT Dissertation Series). PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, A. (2009). Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, 77–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez Fernández, Á., & Tubino Blanco, M. (2014). Variación sintáctica en la causativización. Revista Española de Lingüística, 44(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J. (2004). Spanish reflexive pronouns: A Null Preposition Hypothesis. In G. Garding, & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2008). The syntax of inner aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(to appear). Spanish aspectual se as an indirect object reflexive. The import of atelicity, bare nouns and leísta PCC repairs. Probus.
Maldonado, R. (1988). Energetic reflexives in Spanish. In S. Axmaker et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.153–165). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(2002). Objective and subjective datives. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 1–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masullo, P. J. (1992). Incorporation and case theory in Spanish: A cross linguistic perspective. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Mateu, J. (2012). Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In V. Demonte, & L. McNally (Eds.), Telicity, change and state. A cross-categorial view of event structure (pp. 252–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A. (1999). Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1629). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Nishida, C. (1994). The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics, 32, 425–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A. (2016). The role of se’n in causativized verbs of motion: Evidence from Catalan (+ Aragonese and Italian varieties). Paper given at the Workshop on Romance SE-SI . University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22.
Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon. A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez López, C. (2002). Las construcciones con se. Estado de la cuestión. In C. Sánchez López (Ed.), Las construcciones conse (pp. 13–142). Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland et al. (Eds), Argument structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M. (1982). The syntax and semantics of presentational-type sentences in Spanish. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2014). Reflexive -st verbs in Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 1387–1425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivanco, M. (2016). Scalar constraints on anticausative se. The aspectual hypothesis revisited. Paper given at the Workshop on Romance SE-SI. University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22.
Zagona, K. (1996). Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se . In C. Parodi et al. (Eds.), Aspects of Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV (pp. 475–488). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zwarts, J. (2005). Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 739–779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kamyshna, I.I., L.B. Pavlovych & A.M. Kamyshnyi
2022. Vitamin D alters the transcriptional profile of blood cells in patients with primary hypothyroidism. Fiziolohichnyĭ zhurnal 68:5 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.