Controlled overt pronouns as specificational predicates
Szabolcsi (2009) shows that there are languages where control and raising infinitives have overt subjects, in compliance with (1):
(1)
a.
The overt subjects of control complements can only be pronouns.
b.
The overt subjects of raising complements can be pronouns or lexical DPs.
Drawing on data from European Portuguese (as well as Spanish and Italian) we show that the evidence underlying (1) constitutes a strong case in favor of a non-raising approach to obligatory control. Relying on the observation that many consistent Null Subject Languages (NSL) allow for explicit subjects in raising and control complements, we develop an account that aims to capture the association between this phenomenon and the null subject property.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The data
- 2.1Obligatory control complements
- 2.2Raising complements
- 2.3Discussion
- 3.Multiple subjects and emphatic pronouns
- 3.1Evidence that emphatic pronouns are subjects
- 3.2Multiple subjects in raising and control complements
- 4.Cross-linguistic differences
- 5.Some background assumptions regarding the syntax of the consistent NSLs
- 6.Two possible alternative accounts of controlled pronouns
- 6.1Alternative 1: Controlled pronouns as pronounced PR
- 6.2Alternative 2: The controlled pronoun is a doubling DP within a Big-DP
- 7.The proposal
- 7.1Hungarian structural focus as predication
- 7.2Postverbal subjects in the Romance NSLs
- 8.Infinitival complements revisited
- 8.1Raising complements
- 8.2Control complements
- 9.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Adger, D., & Ramchand, G.
(
2005)
Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited.
Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 161–193.
Ahn, B. T.
(
2010)
Not just emphatic reflexives themselves: Their syntax, semantics and prosody (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.
(
1998)
Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-Checking.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Iordachioaia, G., & Marchis, M.
(
2008)
A stronger argument for backward control. Talk presented at 39th
Meeting of the North East
Linguistic
Society
. Cornell University, November 2008.
Bailyn, J. F.
(
2004)
Generalized inversion.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 1–49.
Barbosa, P.
(
1995)
Null subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Barbosa, P.
(
2000)
Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In
J. Costa (Ed.),
Portuguese syntax: Comparative studies (pp. 31–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barbosa, P.
(
2009)
Two kinds of subject pro
.
Studia Linguistica, 63(1), 2–58.
Barbosa, P.
(
2013)
Partial pro-drop as null NP anaphora. In
Y. Fainleib,
N. Lacara, &
Y. Park (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (Vol. 2, pp. 71–85). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Barbosa, P.
(
2014)
Pro as a minimal NP (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from
[URL]
Belletti, A.
(
2005)
Extended doubling on the VP periphery.
Probus, 17(1), 1–35.
Brandi, L., & Cordin, P.
(
1989)
Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In
O. Jaeggli &
K. Safir (Eds.),
The null subject parameter (pp. 111–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Burzio, L.
(
1986)
Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Campos, H.
(
1997)
On subject extraction and the antiagreement effect in Romance.
Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 92–119.
Cardinaletti, A.
(
1998)
A second thought on emarginazioni: Destressing vs. ‘right dislocation’.
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 8(2), 1–28.
Cardinaletti, A.
(
1999)
Italian emphatic pronouns are postverbal subjects.
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 59–92.
Cardinaletti, A.
(
2004)
Toward a cartography of subject positions. In
L. Rizzi (Ed.),
The cartography of syntactic structures – The structure of CP and IP (Vol. 2, pp. 115–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ceccheto, C.
(
2000)
Doubling structures and reconstruction.
Probus, 12, 93–126.
Chierchia, G.
(
1990)
Anaphora and attitudes de se
. In
R. Bartsch,
J. van Benthem, &
P. van Emde Boas (Eds.),
Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 1–32). Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N.
(
1977)
On wh-Movement. In
P. Culicover,
T. Wasos, &
A. Akmajian (Eds.),
Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Chomsky, N.
(
2000)
Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
R. Martin,
D. Michaels, &
J. Uriagereka (Eds.),
Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, G.
(
1990)
Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, G.
(
1993)
A null theory of phrase and compound stress.
Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239–267.
Clark, R.
(
1990)
Thematic theory in syntax and interpretation. London: Routledge.
Costa, J.
(
1998)
Word order variation. A constraint-based approach. The Hague: HAG.
Costa, J.
(
2004)
Subjects in Spec,vP: locality and agree. In
A. Castro,
M. Ferreira,
V. Hacquard, &
A. Salanova (Eds.),
Romance syntax (
MITWPL 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Costa, J., & Duarte, I.
(
2002)
Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated.
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2, 159–176.
De Cat, C.
(
2007)
French dislocation without movement.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(3), 485–534.
Dermidache, H.
(
1992)
Resumptive chains in restrictive relative chains, appositives and dislocation structures (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
É. Kiss, K.
(
1995)
Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, K.
(
2006)
Focussing as predication. In
V. Molnar &
S. Winkler (Eds.),
The architecture of focus (pp. 169–193). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Elbourne, P.
(
2005)
Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Endriss, C., & Hinterwimmer, S.
(
2008)
Direct and indirect aboutness topics,
Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 297–307.
Gast, V.
(
2006)
The grammar of identity. London: Routledge.
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A.
(
1998)
Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herbeck, P.
(
2011)
Overt subjects in Spanish control infinitives and the theory of empty categories.
Generative Grammar in Geneva, 7, 1–22.
Higgins, R.
(
1973)
The pseudo-cleft construction in English (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Holmberg, A.
(
2005)
Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish.
Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564.
Hornstein, N.
(
1999)
Movement and control.
Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96.
Huber, S.
(
2000)
Es-Clefts und det-Clefts. Zur syntax, semantik und informations struktur von spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Swedischen. Stockholm: Almkist und Wiksell International.
Jaeggli, O.
(
1984)
Subject extraction and the null subject parameter.
North East Linguistic Society, 14, 132–153.
Jelinek, E.
(
1984)
Empty categories, case, and configurationality.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 39–76.
Kato, M.
(
1999)
Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter.
Probus, 11, 1–37.
Kayne, R.
(
1991)
Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO.
Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 647–686.
König, E., & Siemund, P.
(
2005)
Intensifiers and reflexives. In
M. Haspelmath,
M. S. Dryer,
D. Gil, &
N. Comrie (Eds.),
The world atlas of language structures (pp. 194–197). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kratzer, A.
(
2009)
Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns.
Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 187–237.
Landau, I.
(
2015)
A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Livitz, A.
(
2011)
Incorporating PRO: A defective goal analysis.
NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 95–119.
Manzini, M. R.
(
2009)
PRO, pro, and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations. In
K. Grohmann (Ed.),
Explorations of phase theory. Features and arguments (pp. 131–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L.
(
2002)
Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In
P. Svenonius (Ed.),
Subjects, expletives and the EPP (pp. 157–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martins, A. M.
(
1994)
Clíticos na história do português (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Müller, G.
(
2005)
Pro-drop and impoverishment. In
P. Brandt &
E. Fuss (Eds.),
Form, structure and grammar. A Festschrift presented to Günther Grewendorf on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 93–115). Tübingen: Narr.
Noyer, R.
(
1992)
Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Ordóñez, F., & Treviño, E.
(
1999)
Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish.
Lingua, 107, 39–68.
Panagiotidis, P.
(
2003)
Empty nouns.
Natural Language and Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 381–432.
Partee, B.
(
1987)
Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In
J. Groenendijk,
D. de Jongh, &
M. Stokhof (Eds.),
Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.
Piera, C.
(
1987)
Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. In
V. Demonte &
M. Lagunilla (Eds.),
Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas (pp. 148–163). Madrid: Ediciones El Arquero.
Platzack, C.
(
2004)
Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis.
Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 73, 83–112.
Poletto, C.
(
2000)
The higher functional field in the northern Italian dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E.
(
2002)
Backward control.
Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 245–282.
Pollock, J. Y.
(
1997)
Langage et cognition: Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Postal, P.
(
1966)
On so-called “pronouns” in English. In
F. Dinneen (Ed.),
Report on the seventeenth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies (pp. 177–206). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Raposo, E.
(
1994)
Affective operators and clausal structure in European Portuguese and European Spanish. (Unpublished manuscript). University of California at Santa Barbara, CA.
Rigau, G.
(
1987)
Sobre el carácter quantificador de los pronombres tónicos en Catalán. In
V. Demonte &
M. F. Lagunilla (Eds.),
Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas. Madrid: Textos Universitarios.
Rizzi, L.
(
1978)
A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In
S. J. Keyser (Ed.),
Recent transformational studies in European languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, L.
(
1982)
Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L.
(
1997)
The fine structure of the left periphery. In
L. Haegeman (Ed.),
Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, L.
(
2005)
On some properties of subjects and topics. In
L. Brugé,
G. Giusti,
N. Munaro,
W. Schweikert, &
G. Turano (Eds.),
Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. Venezia: Cafoscarina.
Rohrbacher, B.
(
1993)
The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UMass at Amherst.
Sanchez, L.
(
1995)
Syntactic structures and nominals: A comparative study of Spanish and Southern Quechua (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Southern California.
Solà, J.
(
1992)
Agreement and subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Speas, M.
(
1994)
Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. In
E. Benedicto &
J. Runner (Eds.),
Functional projections (
University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17, pp. 179–208). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Szabolcsi, A.
(
1981)
The semantics of Topic-Focus articulation. In
J. Groenendijk,
T. Janssen, &
M. Stokhof (Eds.),
Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 513–541). Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Szabolcsi, A.
(
2009)
Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses.
NYU Working Papers in Linguistics – Papers in syntax Spring 2009, 2, 1–55.
Taraldsen, K.
(
1978)
On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace Filter (Unpublished manuscript). MIT.
Torrego, E.
(
1985)
Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals (Unpublished MA dissertation). UMass at Boston.
Torrego, E.
(
1995)
On the nature of clitic doubling. In
H. Campos &
P. Kempchinsky (Eds.),
Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory (pp. 251–275). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Torrego, E.
(
1996).
On quantifier float in control clauses.
Linguistic Inquiry, 27(1), 111–126.
Uriagereka, J.
(
1995)
Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance.
Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–123.
Vallduví, E.
(
1992)
A preverbal landing site for quantificational operators. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 1992, 319–344. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wedgwood, D.
(
2005)
Shifting the focus: From static structures to the dynamics of interpretation. Oxford: Elsevier.
Wedgwood, D.
(
2009)
Variation in focus. In
A. Riester &
E. Onea (Eds.),
Focus at the syntax-semantics interface, Working Papers of the SFB 732 (Vol. 3, pp. 101–119). University of Stuttgart.
Zeijlstra, H.
(
2012)
There is only one way to agree.
The Linguistic Review, 29, 491–53.
Zubizarreta, M. L.
(
1998)
Word order, prosody and focus. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.