The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish

Along the left periphery

| Villanova University
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027258014 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027269102 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
Complementizers offer a window into the architecture of the left-periphery and further our understanding of the demarcation of the boundaries between the C(omplementizer) and T(ense) domains. Using the articulated left-periphery as a laboratory and Spanish constructions featuring more than one complementizer as a point of departure, the author delivers new insights into the syntactic positions and behavior of Spanish complementizer que along the left edge. These observations have far-reaching consequences to such fundamental linguistic concepts as the derivation of left dislocations, ellipsis, and locality of movement. Of great interest to syntax graduate students and researchers in general, this volume provides a stepping stone to cracking the code on several current syntactic questions, including the widely-contested position of preverbal subjects in null-subject languages like Spanish. In addition, it offers the linguist a bountiful toolbox for the cross-linguistic investigation of a number of left-peripheral and clausal phenomena.
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2]  2015.  xv, 274 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.2
Table of Contents
Preface
xi–xiii
List of abbreviations
xv–xiv
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–16
Chapter 2. Toward a syntactic analysis of Spanish recomplementation
17–82
Chapter 3. Two distinct complementizers in disguise: Implications for the syntax of preverbal subjects
83–142
Chapter 4. On the impossibility of movement across non-primary complementizers in Spanish
143–182
Chapter 5. Analyzing the locality effect with non-primary que complementizers in Spanish
183–250
References
251–272
Index
273–274
“This is an excellent book on the syntax of Spanish que. The author shows an impressive mastery of the literature and pays a great deal of attention to even the smallest detail. The quality of argumentation provided in the book is outstanding and highly detailed, and the empirical coverage of the monograph is laudable. The book is very well-written and easy to read.”
“This book provides a detailed and tightly argued analysis of a particular phenomenon in Spanish syntax — subordinate clauses with more than one instance of the complementizer que — and in so doing engages with various long-standing issues in Spanish generative studies, such as clitic left-dislocations, the nature of the left periphery, preverbal subjects, locality, and the mechanisms underlying ellipsis. It should be obligatory reading for linguists working on these issues in Spanish in particular and Romance languages more generally.”
“This monograph offers a detailed, careful, and up-to-date study of the syntax of complementizers in Spanish. Adopting the cartographic framework, Villa-García accounts for the distribution of multiple complementizers and its consequences for other phenomena (locality, ellipsis, topicalization, etc.). Certainly a must-read for everyone interested in the left periphery of Spanish and Romance more generally.”
“This book provides a current account of the syntax of double-complementizer constructions in Spanish, an area of Spanish syntax not previously explored. In addition, the vast empirical evidence included in the analysis turns this book into an impressive introduction to (mostly) all phenomena related to the Spanish left periphery. This well-written book will be useful not only to researchers working on the syntax of Spanish complementizers or the Romance left periphery, but also to any person interested in the overall properties of the Spanish CP field, word order, and the architecture of the Spanish clause.”
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Focus-related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7], Crossref logo
Colasanti, Valentina & Giuseppina Silvestri
2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Frank, Joshua
2016.  In Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 12], ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Un caso de variación pragmático-discursiva: que inicial en tres variedades dialectales del español. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1 ► pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Gupton, Timothy & Elizabeth Gielau
2021.  In East and West of The Pentacrest [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 33], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
López, Laura González & Andreas Trotzke
2021.  ¡Mira! The grammar-attention interface in the Spanish left periphery. The Linguistic Review 38:1 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Suárez-Büdenbender, Eva-María
2020. Alejandro Cuza (ed.). Cuban Spanish Dialectology: Variation, Contact, and Change. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Villa-García, Julio & Raquel González Rodríguez
2020. On the Contrasts Between sí ‘yes’ and sí que ‘yes that’ in Spanish and the Structure of the Complementizer Phrase Domain. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 451 ff. Crossref logo
Villa-García, Julio & Imanol Suárez-Palma
2016. Early null and overt subjects in the Spanish of simultaneous English-Spanish bilinguals and Crosslinguistic Influence. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 350 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abels, Klaus
2003 Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2012 The Italian periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 229–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch
2004 The Morphosyntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 1–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke
2010 The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 191]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1998 Parameterizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
An, Duk-Ho
2007 Syntax at the PF Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1997 Clitic-Left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, André
2012 Syncretic projections in Spanish: The case of complementizerless clauses. Paper presented at the 2012 Hispanic Linguistics Symposium.
2013 On the left periphery of Spanish complementizerless clauses. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro, Gillian Lord, Ana de Prada Pérez & Jessi Elana Aaron, 15–26. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Yen-hui, Audrey Li
2003 Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar. The Diversity of Wh-Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ausín, Adolfo & Martí, Luisa
1999 Subject-verb inversion and the A′-status of preverbal subjects in Spanish. Paper presented at the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium.
Authier, Marc
2011 A movement analysis of French modal ellipsis. Probus 23: 175–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1996 The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric
1995 A markedness subhierarchy in syntax: Optimality and inversion in Spanish. Ms, Rutgers University.
Barbosa, Pilar
1995 Null Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
2000 Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In Portuguese Syntax. New Comparative Studies, João Costa (ed.), 31–94. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001 On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 20–59. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 Two kinds of subject pro . Studia Linguistica 63: 2–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Partial pro-drop as null NP anaphora. Paper presented at NELS 41.
Barss, Andrew
1986 Chains and Anaphoric Dependence. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Beas, Omar
2007 Agreement on the Left Edge and the Syntax of Dislocation in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
2013 A verb raising analysis of interrogatives: The preverbal subject constraint in Spanish. Poster presented at the 37th Penn Linguistics Colloquium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA.
Belazi, Hedi, Rubin, Edward J. & Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline
1994 Code switching and X-bar theory: The Functional Head Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 221–237.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
(ed.) 2004b Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1988 The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1–34.Google Scholar
2004a Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia
2004 Topic, focus and V2. In The Structure of CP and IP (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures), Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cinque, Guglielmo
2010 La frase relativa. In Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico, Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds), 469–507. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Munaro, Nicola
(eds) 2010 Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 5. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2001 The position of Topic and Focus in the left periphery. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampoalo Salvi (eds), 39–64. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics, Raffaela Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner, 53–86. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2010a Lexical complementizers and headless relatives. Ms, University of Padova. Also in Functional Heads , Laura Bruge, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds). Oxford: OUP.
2010b La periferia sinistra. In Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico, Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds), 27–59. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans
2000 On the interpretation of functional categories. In Interface Strategies, Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert & Eric Reuland (eds), 37–53, Amsterdam: KNAW.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans & Moed-van Walraven, Corretje
1985 The syntax of verbs in Yiddish. In V-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds), 111–136. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Yoon, James
1992 On the composition of Comp and parameters of V-2. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 10: 41–53.Google Scholar
Biezma, María
2007 An expressives analysis of exclamatives in Spanish. Paper presented at Going Romance 21.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2005 Re: CycLin and the role of PF in object shift. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 111–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 What does adjacency do? In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22, Heidi Harley & Colin Phillips (eds), 1–32. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 A-chains at the PF interface: Copies and “covert” movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Wurmbrand, Susi
2005 The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 809–865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2004 Contrastive focalization on topics and preverbal subjects in Italian. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 29: 3–60.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Lasnik, Howard
2006 Intervention and repair. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 150–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2004 Bare syntax. Ms, Harvard University.
2007 Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Lasnik, Howard
2003 On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 527–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Takahashi, Daiko
1998 Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Nunes, Jairo
2007 The copy theory of movement: A view from PF. In The Copy Theory of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
1994 D-structure, theta-criterion, and movement into theta-positions. Linguistic Analysis 24: 247–86.Google Scholar
1997a The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997b Fronting wh-phrases in Serbo-Croatian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Indiana Meeting, 1995, Steven Franks & Martin Lindseth (eds), 86–107. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2001 On the Nature of the Syntax-phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2002 On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 On the clitic switch in Greek imperatives. In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], Olga Mišeska Tomić (ed.), 269–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008a On the operator freezing effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 249–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b On successive cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.Google Scholar
2011 Rescue by PF deletion, traces as (non-)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Traces do not head islands: What can PF deletion rescue? In Deep Insights, Broad Perspectives. Essays in Honor of Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, Daiko Takahashi, Hideki Maki, Masao Ochi, Koji Sugisaki & Asako Uchibori (eds), 56–93. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2013b Principles and parameters theory and minimalism. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 95–121. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta
1999 Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Real Academia de la Lengua Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1980 Retrospective imperatives. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 415–419.Google Scholar
Branigan, Phil
2011 Provocative Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W.
1977 Variables in the theory of transformations. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 157–196. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brovetto, Claudia
2002 Spanish clauses without complementizer. In Current issues in Romance languages: Selected Proceedings from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL-29) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brucart, José María & MacDonald, Jonathan
2012 Empty categories and ellipsis. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, Juan I. Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds), 579–602. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brucart, José María
1993 Sobre la estructura de SCOMP en español. In Sintaxi: Teoria i perspectives, Amadeu Viana (ed.), 59–102. Lleida: Amadeu Pagès.Google Scholar
1999 La elipsis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2787–2866. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Buesa-García, Carlos
2008 The subject-gap restriction in Spanish wh-questions: Some empirical and theoretical consequences. Second general examination, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
2011 El hueco de sujeto en español y algunas consecuencias teóricas y empíricas. Cuadernos de la ALFAL 3: 7–18.Google Scholar
Burga, Alicia
2008 Spanish Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1993 The sentential complementation of Salentino: A study of a language without infinitival clauses. In Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Adriana Belleti (ed.), 28–98. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Camacho, José & Sánchez, Liliana
2014 Does the verb raise to T in Spanish? Ms, Rutgers University.
Camacho, José
2006 Do subjects have a place in Spanish? In New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 275], Jean- Chiyo Nishida & Pierre Y. Montreuil (eds), 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Evaluatives and the Structure of CP. Ms, Rutgers University.
2011 On the position of preverbal subject in Spanish. A view from the discourse perspective. Ms, Rutgers University.
2013 Null Subjects. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Héctor
1992 Los bearneses que quequean, ¿y nosotros qué?. Hispanic Linguistics 4: 329–349.Google Scholar
l997 On subject extraction and the anti-agreement effect in Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 92–119Google Scholar
Canac-Marquis, Réjean
1991 On the obligatory character of inversion in Spanish. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 10: 309–318.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1996 Subjects and clause structure. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 55–95.Google Scholar
2004 Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 On a (wh-)moved topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, J. Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schaeffer (eds), 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrilho, Ernestina
2005 Expletive ele in European Portuguese Dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.
Casasanto, Laura S. & Sag, Ivan A.
2008 The advantage of the ungrammatical. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Casielles-Suárez, Eugenia
1998a Preverbal subjects vs. dislocated phrases in Spanish. In Perspectives on Spanish Linguistics, Vol. 3, Javier Gutiérrez Rexach & José del Valle (eds), 1–19. Columbus OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
1998b Syntactic structure, information structure and generative grammar. In Festschrift in Honor of Noam Chomsky’s 70th Birthday, ⟨http://​cognet​.mit​.edu​/Books​/celebration​/essays​/Casielles​-Suárez​.html⟩Google Scholar
1998c FOCUS PREPOSING it’s called. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21: 51–64.Google Scholar
1999 Notes on the topic-focus articulation. In Advances in Hispanic Linguistics, Javier Gutiérrez Rexach & Fernando Martinez Gil (eds), 343–363. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2000 On the topicalizing nature of multiple left-dislocations. In BLS 26: 53–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The syntax and semantics of preverbal topical phrases in Spanish. In Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Luis Silva-Villar (eds), 65–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003a On the interaction between syntactic and information structures in Spanish. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 80: 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b Left-dislocated structures in Spanish. Hispania 86: 326–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The Syntax-Information Structure Interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castillo-Orihuela, Concepción
2003 Los adverbios y el movimiento V-a-C. Revista Española de Lingüística 33: 436–443.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977 Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1971 Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds), 183–216. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1972 Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Goals of Linguistic Theory, P. Stanley Peters (ed.), 63–130. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
1977 On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrin Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
(ed.) 2002 The Structure of DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2010.The cartography of syntactic structures. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 51–65. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1977 The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–412.Google Scholar
1990 Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993 A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cocchi, Gloria & Poletto, Cecilia
2007 Complementizer deletion and double complementizers. In Proceedings of the 32nd Incontro di Gramatica Generativa, M. Cecilia Picchi, Alan Pona, et al.. (eds), 49–62. Firenze: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles
1991 On the position of subjects. Syntax and Semantics 25: 63–79.Google Scholar
Costa, João
2004 Subject Positions and Interfaces: The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2004 Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leiden.
CREA. Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. Real Academia Española (RAE)
http://​corpus​.rae​.es​/creanet​.html⟩
Cremades, Sancho
2006 Interjecciones intensificadoras en español y en catalán coloquiales: Los casos del esp./cat. mira, esp. vaya, cat. vaja y esp. cuidado . Lingüística Española Actual 28: 91–133.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Remberger, Eva-Maria
2008 Hearsay and reported speech: Evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 99–120.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2006 Informational focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 363–385. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse-related Features and the Syntax of Peripheral Positions: A Comparative Study of Sicilian and Other Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
2010a Fronting as focalization in Sicilian. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 247–260. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010b Aspetti morfologici e sintattici degli avverbi in siciliano. In Studi sui dialetti della Sicilia [Quaderni di lavoro ASIt 11], Jacopo Garzonio (ed.), 21–42. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
2011a On the syntactic status of sentential adverbs and modal particles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 63: 345–357.Google Scholar
2011b Grammaticalization and the expression of evidentiality and epistemicity in Italian and in Sicilian. Handout, University of Manchester.
Culicover, Peter W.
1992 The adverb effect: Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect. In NELS 23: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Amy J. Schafer (ed.), 97–111. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Cuza, Alejandro & Frank, Joshua
2014 On the role of experience and age-related effects: Evidence from the Spanish CP. Second Language Research: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Ledgeway, Adam
2010 At the C–T boundary: Investigating Abruzzese complementation. Lingua 120: 2040–2060. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dagnac, Anne
2011 Generalized C-doubling in an Oïl dialect, subjects and the nature of que2 . Paper presented at the Edysin Workshop, University of Amsterdam.
2012 How do you double your C? Evidence from an Oïl dialect. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Pinón (ed.), 1–18: ⟨http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss9/⟩
De Cat, Cécile
2007 French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos & Ürögdi, Barbara
2009 Eliminating factivity from syntax: Sentential complements in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 11, Marcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds), 29–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos & MacDonald, Jonathan
2013a Referentiality in Spanish CPs. In Agreement, Information Structure and the CP [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 117–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b On the referential status of embedded polarity answers in Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro, Gilian Lord, Ana de Prada Pérez & Jessi Elana Aaron (eds), 212–323. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2014 Truncation in the Spanish left-periphery: Fragment answers and recomplementation. Paper presented at the Linguistics Society of America Annual Meeting, Minnesota.
Delfitto, Dennis
2002 On the semantics of pronominal clitics and some of its consequences. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 41–69.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2007 La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español. In Vernetzungen: Kognition, Bedeutung, (kontrastive) Pragmatik, Juan Cuartero & Martine Emsel (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009 Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21: 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a El ‘que’ citativo en español y otros elementos de la periferia oracional. Variación inter e intralingüística. In Autour de ‘que’, Daniel Jakob & Katya Plooj (eds), 47–69. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013b Evidentials dizque and que in Spanish. Grammaticalization, parameters and the (fine) structure of Comp. Linguistica. Revista de Estudos linguísticos da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
2014 Evidentiality and illocutionary force. Spanish matrix ‘que’ at the syntax-semantics interface. In Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish; Diachronic, Variationist, and Typological Perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214], Andreas Dufter & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo (eds), 217–251. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Despić, Miloje
2011 Syntax in the Absence of DP. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Diesing, Molly
1990 Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 41–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2007 Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1994 The Syntax of Romanian: Comparative Studies in Romance. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durrleman-Tame, Stephanie
2008 The Syntax of Jamaican Creole. A Cartographic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 127]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Shane
2013 C, inversion, and Spanish clause structure: Evidence from code-switching. Paper presented at the 2013 Hispanic Linguistics Symposium.
Emonds, Joe
1978 The verbal complex V′-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–176.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
2004 Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger, Cecile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, José Luis Rafael G.
1991 Una teoría de la oración. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo
1998 On the Grammatical Representation of Speech Events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland-College Park.
2008 On quotative constructions in Iberian Spanish. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining. The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 35–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua 120: 604–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Quotative expansions. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011. Selected Papers of Going Romance 2011 [Romance Languages and Theory 5], Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni & Manuela Pinto (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco José
2009 Clitics at the Edge: Clitic Placement in Western Iberian Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.
Fontana, Josep M.
1993 Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
1994 A Residual A-Bar Position in Spanish. In The Proceedings of the Twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Eric Duncan, Donka Farkas & Philip Spaelti (eds), 233–250. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard
2003 Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven
1998 Clitics in Slavic. Paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, Indiana.
Frascarelli, Mara & Puglielli, Annarita
2010 Focus in the force-fin system. Information structure in Cushitic languages. In Focus Strategies: Evidence from African languages, Enoch Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Ronald
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 86–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret
1986 Specifiers and projections. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL) 8: 128–172.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J.
2007 Phase Theory and Parametric Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
2009 Ellipsis by Phase. Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Gallego, Ángel J. & Uriagereka, Juan
2006 Sub-extraction from subjects. Ms., Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona/University of Maryland, College Park.
2007a Sub-extraction from subjects: A phase theory account. In Romance Linguistics 2006 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 287], José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Ferrán, Liliane Sánchez, Viviane Déprez & María José Cabrera (eds), 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b Conditions on sub-extraction. In Coreference, Modality, and Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Cornejo, Rosalía
2006 Morfología y sintaxis de ‘que’ en la Edad Media. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla, Secretariado de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
García, Erica
1996 ¿Cómo que qué? Hispanic Linguistics 8: 59–93.Google Scholar
Garrett, Jordan
2013 Which que is which?: A squib on reduplicative que complementizers in Iberian Spanish embedded clauses. Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–9.Google Scholar
González i Planas, Francesc
2010 Cartografia de la recomplementació en les llengües romàniques. MA thesis. University of Girona.
2011 La duplicació del complementador en les llengües iberoromàniques. Ms, Universitat de Girona.
2014 On quotative recomplementation: Between pragmatics and morphosyntax. Lingua 146: 39–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Vilbazo, Kay
2005 Die Syntax des Code-switching. Esplugisch: Sprachwechsel an der Deutschen Schule Barcelona. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität zu Köln.
Goodall, Grant
1991 On the status of the Spec of IP. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 10: 175–182.Google Scholar
2001 The EPP in Spanish. In Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical Functions, Functional Categories, and Configurationality, William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds), 193–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 On the syntax and processing of wh-questions in Spanish. In WCCFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo J. Rodríguez & Benjamin Schmeiser (eds), 237–250. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2002 Left dislocation as movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 31–81.Google Scholar
Grinstead, John
1998 Subjects, Sentential Negation, and Imperatives in Child Spanish and Catalan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. & Etxepare, Ricardo
2003 Root infinitives: A comparative view. Probus 15: 201–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes
2003 Prolific Domains: On the Anti-locality of Movement Dependencies [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 66]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Top issues in questions: Topics-topicalization-topicalizability. In Wh-movement. Moving on, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 249–288. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gupton, Timothy
2010 The Syntax Information Structure Interface: Subjects and Clausal Word Order in Galician. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa.
2014a Preverbal subjects in Galician: Experimental data in the A vs. Ā debate. Probus 26: 135–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b The Syntax-Information Structure Interface. Clausal Word Order and the Left Periphery in Galician. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2008 Topicalization and preverbal subjects in Spanish wh-interrogatives. In Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Joyce Bruhn de Garavito & Elena Valenzuela (eds), 225–236. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ürögdi, Barbara
2010 Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 111–152.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2000 Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 121–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 640–649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006a Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations, Raffaela Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 27–52. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2006b Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Operator movement and topicalization in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 18: 485–502.Google Scholar
2009 The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses. English Language and Linguistics 13: 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael
1992 Adjunct Extraction and Chain Configuration. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Higgins, Roger
1988 Where the Old English sentence begins. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hiramatsu, Kazuko
2000 Accessing Linguistic Competence: Evidence from Children’s and Adults’ Acceptability Judgments. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Holmberg, Anders
2001 The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55: 141–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Lasnik, Howard & Uriagereka, Juan
2003 The dynamics of islands: Speculations on the locality of movement. Linguistic Analysis 33: 149–175.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1995 Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1999 Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 On control. In Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 6–81. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2009 Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84: 21–51.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine & Kroch, Anthony
1992 The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 50: 1–25.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine
1995 Clitics and island effects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 11–31.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, K.A.
2008 Topic, focus and adverb positions in clause structure. Nanzan Linguistics 4: 43–68.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014 A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel
2011 On the order of multiple topics and discourse-feature inheritance. Dilbilim Araştırmaları 2011 5–32.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary
1999 Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus 11: 1–37. Doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1991 Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula
2002 Locative inversion, PP topicalization, and the EPP. In Current Issues in Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds), 145–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119: 1788–1810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 CLLD as a window into the left periphery. In Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS 2011), Chad Howe, Sarah E. Blackwell & Margaret Lubbers Quesada (eds). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
2004 On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian Multiple wh-fronting. Ms, University of Venice.
Laenzlinger, Christopher
1998 Comparative Studies in Word Order Variation: Adverbs, Pronouns, and Clause Structure in Romance and Germanic [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, Uptal
1991 On Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2002 Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990 Negation in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lambova, Mariana
2002 On A′-movements in Bulgarian and their interaction. The Linguistic Review 18: 327–374.Google Scholar
2004 On Information Structure and Clausal Architecture: Evidence from Bulgarian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru
1992 Move Alpha: Conditions on Its Application and Output. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard
1995 Last resort and attract F. In Proceedings of FLSM 6: 62–81.
2001 When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 31, 301–320. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Law, Paul
1994 On the base position of wh-adjuncts and extraction. Talk given at the 67th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, California.
Ledgeway, Adam
2000 A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach [Publications of the Philological Society 33]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004 Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali: La doppia serie di complementatori. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 27: 89–147.Google Scholar
2005 Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementizer system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103: 229–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 The dual complementiser system in Southern Italy: Spiritogreco, material romanza? In Rethinking Languages in Contact: The Case of Italian, Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds), 112–26. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
2009 Aspetti della sintassi della periferia sinistra del cosentino. In Studi sui Dialetti della Calabria [Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 9], Diego Pescarini (ed.), 3–24. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
2010 The clausal domain: CP structure and the left periphery. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, Roberto D’Alesssandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 38–51. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2012a From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Change and Typology. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b La sopravvivenza del sistema dei doppi complementatori nei dialetti meridionali. In Atti del II Convegno internazionale di dialettologia – Progetto A.L.Ba., Patrizia del Puente (ed.), 151–176. Rionero in Vulture: Calice Editore.Google Scholar
To appear. Reconstructing complementiser-drop in the dialects of the Salento: A syntactic or phonological phenomenon? In Diachronic Generative Syntax XII Meeting, Teresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds) Cambridge University of Cambridge
Lema, José & Rivero, María Luisa
1990 Long head movement: ECP vs. HMC. In Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa 18: 61–78.Google Scholar
1991 Types of verbal movement in Old Spanish: Modals, futures, and perfects. Probus 3: 237–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, Anne
1990 Functional heads as proper governors. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 20: 348–362.Google Scholar
López, Luis
1995 The hierarchy of negation and tense: The case of English. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) X: 186–197.Google Scholar
1999 VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11: 263–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Toward a grammar without TopP and FocP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 181–209.Google Scholar
2003 Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica 57: 193–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Ranking the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 239–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
1977 Relative clauses in Yiddish: A case for movement. Linguistic Analysis 3: 197–216.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita & Savoia, Leonardo
2002 Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 157–200. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011 Grammatical Categories. Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín, Zorraquino, Maria Antonia & Portolés Lázaro, José
1999 Los marcadores del discurso. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 4051–4214. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Martín-González, Javier
2000 (Non-)occurrence of sentential no in Spanish negative sentences. Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 The Syntax of Sentential Negation in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Mascarenhas, Salvador
2007 Complementizer doubling in European Portuguese. Ms, Amsterdam/New York: ILLC/NYU.
Masullo, Pascual
1992 Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
McCloskey, James
2006 Questions and questioning in a local English. In Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations, Raffaela Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 86–126. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Eduardo
1986 La ciudad de los prodigios. Barcelona: Seix Barral.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón
1908 Cantar de mío Cid: Texto, gramática y vocabulario. Madrid: Imprenta de Bailly-Bailliere e hijos.Google Scholar
Menn, Lise & MacWhinney, Brian
1984 The repeated morph constraint: Toward an explanation. Language 19: 519–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
1999 The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and Identity in Ellipsis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
2001 The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina
2013 El bilingüismo en el mundo hispanohablante. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Motapanyane-Hill, Virginia
1991 Theoretical Implications of the Complementation in Romanian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Genève.
Munaro, Nicola
2003 On some differences between exclamative and interrogative wh-phrases in Bellunese: Further evidence for a split-CP hypothesis. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 137–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Napoli, Dona Jo
1976 The Two si’s of Italian. An Analysis of Reflexive, Inchoative, and Indefinite Subject Sentences in Modern Standard Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
2007 Syntactic haplology. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 684–710. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew & Anand, Pranav
2003 Some AGREEment matters. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Nunes, Jairo
2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ojea-López, Ana
1994 Adverbios y categorías funcionales en español. Revista Española de Lingüística 24: 393–416.Google Scholar
Olarrea, Antxon
1996 Pre and Postverbal Subjects in Spanish: A Minimalist Account. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
1998 On the position of subjects in Spanish. ASJU XXXII-1: 47–108.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Olarrea, Antxon
2006 Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. Probus 18: 59–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela
1999 Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1997 Word Order and Clausal Structure of Spanish and Other Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.
2005 Two specs for postverbal subjects: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Ms, SUNY Stony Brook.
Ortega-Santos, Iván & Villa-García, Julio
In preparation. Evidence for an Active EPP in Spanish. Ms, University of Memphis and Villanova University.
Ortega-Santos, Iván
2005 On locative inversion and the EPP in Spanish. In Actas del VIII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística del Noroeste de la Universidad de Sonora. Universidad de Sonora, Mexico, 131–150.
2006a On new information focus, sentence stress assignment conditions and the copy theory: A Spanish conspiracy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 188–212.Google Scholar
2006b On postverbal subjects, PF and the copy theory: The Spanish case. In Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of The Hispanic Linguistics Symposium & The Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 56–66. Somerville MA: Cascadilla University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Projecting Subjects in English and Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
2013 Corrective focus at the right edge in Spanish. Lingua 131: 112–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otero, Carlos
1993 Head movement, cliticization, and word insertion. In Current Issues in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2003 COMP and the Left Periphery: Comparative Evidence from Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.
2004 The ‘double CHE constructions’: A comparative perspective. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107: 193–209.Google Scholar
2005 COMP: A multi-talented category. Evidence from Romance. In Contributions to the 13th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Venice, February 26–28, 2004, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 185–202. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2006 The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects: Evidence from Romance. Lingua 117: 1057–1079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Bum-Sik
2005 Focus, Parallelism, and Identity in Ellipsis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Pearce, Elizabeth
1999 Topic and focus in a head-initial language: Maori. In Proceedings of AFLA VI. The Sixth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association [University of Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], Catherine Smallwood & Carolyn Kitto (eds), 249–263. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Pérez-Jiménez, María Isabel & Moreno-Quibén, Norberto
2008 El margen izquierdo oracional en español: Cláusulas absolutas periféricas y predicados incidentales. Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL), Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz (eds). Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971 Deep and Surface Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2001 T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006 Probes, goals and syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed.). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
2007 The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1992 Zero Syntax, Vol. 2. Ms, MIT.
1997 Optimality theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In Optimality Theory: An Overview, Diana Archangeli & D. Terrence Langendoen (eds), 134–170. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998 Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the Best Good Enough?, Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky (eds), 337–383. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press & MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Philippaki‑Warburton, Irene
1985 Word order in Modern Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 83: 113‑143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plann, Susan
1982 Indirect questions in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 297–312.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer
2001 Multiple interfaces. In Cognitive Interfaces Constraints on Linking Cognitive Information, Urpo Nikanne & Emilie van der Zee, 21–53.Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Cross-linguistic word order variation at the left periphery: The case of object first main clauses. In Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 59], David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (ed.), 191–210. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2000 The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pöll, Bernhard
2010 Some remarks on subject positions and the architecture of the left periphery in Spanish. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique 5: 359–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Yean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey
2006 Interpolation and the left periphery in Old Spanish. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Porroche Ballesteros, Margarita
2000 Algunos aspectos del uso de que en el español conversacional (que como introductor de oraciones ‘independientes’). Clac 3.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2011 Agreement as a Fallible Operation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Prince, Ellen F.
1981 Topicalization, focus-movement and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 349–364.Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva
2000 Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of Ā-positions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep
1999 Free relatives and the contribution of mood shift to interpretation. In Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel, Adam Z. Wyner (ed.), 69–89. Beer-Sheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev.Google Scholar
2001 Interpreting mood. Probus 13: 81–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2011 Complementizer use in spoken English. Ms, University of Essex.
2013 The complementizer system in spoken English. Evidence from broadcast media. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 11–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
RAE
2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Real Academia Española (RAE). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo & Uriagereka, Juan
2005 Clitic placement in Western Iberian: A minimalist view. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 639–697. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
1994 Affective operators and clausal structure in European Portuguese and European Spanish. Ms, University of California at Santa Barbara.
1996 Towards a unification of topic constructions. Ms, University of California at Santa Barbara.
Rathmann, Elizabeth
2012 Recomplementation: An operator account. Ms, University of Iowa.
Ribeiro, Ilza
2010 Sobre os usos de ênclise nas estruturas subordinadas no português arcaico. Estudos da Língua(gem) 8: 15–40.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
1999 Complementizer cliticization in Tagalog and English. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2): Proceedings of AFLA 6 [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], Catherine Smallwood & Carolyn Kitto (eds), 297–312. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2008 Identity avoidance: OCP effects in Swiss relatives. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 227–250. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa
1980 On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.Google Scholar
1994 On indirect questions, commands, and Spanish quotative que. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 547–554.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Roberts, Ian
l989 Complex Inversion in French. Probus 1: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2005 Strategies of subject extraction. Ms, Universities of Siena and Geneva.
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1996 Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (eds), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref
2001 On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251.Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005 On some properties of subjects and topics. In Contributions to the 13th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Venice, February 26–28, 2004, Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 203–224. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement. Moving on, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25: 197 – 226.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2004 The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2 and the EPP. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel
2007 The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Rodríguez-Ramalle, Teresa
2003 La gramática de los adverbios en -mente o cómo expresar maneras, opiniones y actitudes a través de la lengua. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
2006 El complementante que en el discurso periodístico. Paper presented at the XXXVI Simposio de la SEL, UNED, Madrid.
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1990 On Icelandic word order once more. In Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds), 3–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ron, María Pilar
1998 The Position of the Subject in Spanish and Clausal Structure: Evidence from Dialectal Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University IL.
Ross, John Robert
1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
1969 Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria
2006 On Greek VSO again. Journal of Linguistics 42: 317‑354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roussou, Anna
2000 On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saab, Andrés
2009 Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad de Buenos Aires.
2010a Silent interactions: Spanish TP-ellipsis and the theory of island repair. Probus 22: 73–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Null subjects at the syntax-morphology connection. Paper presented at Romania Nova IV, Brazil.
Saito, Mamoru & Murasugi, Keiko
1990 N′-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. UConnWPL 3: 87–107.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru & Haraguchi, Tomoko
2012 Deriving the cartography of the Japanese right periphery: The case of sentence-final discourse particles. Iberia 4: 104–123.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru
2010 On the architecture of Japanese CPs. Talk given at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Schneider-Zioga, Patricia
2005 Bounded unbounded movement. Ms, University of Southern California.
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabiela
2011 Where’s why. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 651–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, William
2007 Child Language: The Parametric Approach.Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Solà, Jaume
1992 Agreement and Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol.1 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy
1994 Null arguments in a theory of economy of projection. In UMass Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Elena Benedicto & Jeffrey T. Runner (eds), 19–47. Amherst MA: GLSAGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Leo
1942 Notas sintáctico-estilísticas a propósito del español que . Revista de Filología Hispánica 4: 105–126.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominiche
1993 Clitic constructions. Ms, UCLA.
Sportiche, Dominique
2005 Division of labor between merge and move: Strict locality of selection and apparent reconstruction paradoxes. In Proceedings of the Workshop Divisions of Linguistic Labor, The La Bretesche Worskhop. Nantes.
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Revithiadou, Anthi
2009. Subject chains in Greek and PF processing. In Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT, Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman & David Hill (eds) 293 309 Cambridge MA MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
Stjepanović, Sandra
1999 What do Second Position Cliticization, Scrambling, and Multiple Wh-Fronting Have in Common? Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Suñer, Margarita
1991 Indirect questions and the structure of CP: Some consequences. In Current Studies in Spanish Linguistics, Héctor Campos & Fernando Martínez-Gil (eds), 283–312. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1993 About indirect questions and semi-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 45–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Negative elements, island effects and resumptive ‘no’. The Linguistic Review 12: 233–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 La subordinación sustantiva: La interrogación indirecta. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2149–2195. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
2003 The lexical preverbal subject in a Romance null subject language: Where art thou? In A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Raffael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis Lópéz & Richard Cameron (eds), 341–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko
1994 Minimality of Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Takahashi, Masahiko
2010 Case, phases, and nominative/accusative conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 319–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Some Consequences of Case-marking in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Taraldsen, Knut
1992 Subject/verb-agreement in Celtic and Romance. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 23(2): 495–504. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Ticio, Emma
2004 On the position of subjects in Puerto Rican Spanish. In The University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics (UCONNWPL) 12, Miguel Rodríguez-Mondoñedo & Emma Ticio (eds).Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
2003 The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguisics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 321–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline
1994 Dialectal variation in the licensing of null referential and expletive subjects. In Aspects of Romance Linguistic: Papers from the XXIV Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 409–431. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 110: 315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther
1983 More effects of successive cyclic movement. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 561–565.Google Scholar
1984 On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–129.Google Scholar
1985 On empty categories in nominals. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Boston.Google Scholar
1989 Unergative unaccusative alternations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 253–272.Google Scholar
Torrence, Harold
2012 The Clause Structure of Wolof: Insights into the Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 198]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2008 Left periphery and why-how alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2): 83–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1988 On Government. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
1995a An F position in Western Romance. In Discourse Configurational Languages [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], É. Katalin Kiss (eds), 153–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1995b Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
1999a Minimal Restrictions on Basque Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 403–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999b Multiple spell-out. In Working minimalism, Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 251–282. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam
1991 On the structural positions of the subjects in Spanish, their nature and their consequences for quantification. Ms, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
1992 On the structural positions of the subject in Spanish, their nature and their consequences for quantification. In Studies in Generative Grammar and Basque Syntax. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philosophy, Joseba Lakarra & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 447‑491.Google Scholar
1995 On the nature of SPEC/IP and its relevance for scope asymmetries in Spanish and English. In Contemporary Research in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 123], Jon Amastae, Grant Goodall, Mario Montalbetti & Marianne Phinney (eds), 355–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric
1990 The Information Component. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio & Todorović, Neda
2010 What will the Serbo-Croatian-acquiring child use first, SV or VS? Ms, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Villa-García, Julio & Snyder, William
2010 On the acquisition of overt subjects, topics, and wh-questions in Spanish. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, Ana Castro, João Costa, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 493–504. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio, Snyder, William & Riqueros-Morante, José
2010 On the analysis of lexical subjects in Caribbean and mainland Spanish: Evidence from L1 acquisition. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 34), Katie Franich, Kate M. Iserman & Lauren L. Keil (eds), 333–344. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio
2010a Acquisitional evidence bearing on the account of preverbal and postverbal subjects in Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Luis A. Ortiz-López (ed.), 178–189. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2010b Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Second General Examination Paper, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2012a Characterizing medial and low complementizers in Spanish: Recomplementation que and ‘jussive/optative’ que . In Current Formal Aspects of Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Melvin González-Rivera & Sandro Sessarego (eds), 198–228. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012b The Spanish Complementizer System: Consequences for the Syntax of Dislocations and Subjects, Locality of Movement, and Clausal Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2012c Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus 24: 257–314.Google Scholar
2012d Spanish subjects can be subjects: Acquisitional and empirical evidence. Iberia 4: 124–169.Google Scholar
2014 Constituent questions in Romance and the subject-gap restriction: A New argument for lower copy pronunciation. Paper presented at the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 44), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, 2–4 May.
In preparation. Dialectal variation in clitic placement in Andalusian and Asturian Spanish negative infinitival imperatives. Ms, Villanova University.
Villalba, Xavier
2000 The Syntax of Sentence Periphery. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter
1996 Syntactic change and subordinate topicalization. Ms, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
1998 Les subordonnées à double complémentateur en roman medieval. In Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Giovanni Ruffino. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Gregory
1985 The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2014 Stripping and topless complements. Ms, University of Connecticut.
Zubizarreta, María Luisa
1998 Word Order, Prosody and Focus. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Word order in Spanish and the nature of nominative Case. In Beyond Principles and Parameters, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts, 223–250. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 A note on the Spanish left periphery. In Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 7, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana. Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Generative linguistics
Romance linguistics
Syntax
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CF/2ADS – Linguistics/Spanish
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014037674 | Marc record