Chapter published in:
Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception
Edited by Whitney Chappell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 21] 2019
► pp. 1638
References

References

Barnes, S.
(2015) Perceptual salience and social categorization of contact features in Asturian Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8, 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Variable final back vowels in urban Asturian Spanish. Spanish in Context 13, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Negotiating local identity: Rural migration and sociolinguistic perception in urban Asturias. Lengua y migración 8, 45–77.Google Scholar
(Forthcoming). The unstressed vowel system of Asturian Spanish: Language contact and phonetic contrast in word-final position. In R. G. Rao Ed. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics. Spanish phonetics and phonology in contact: Studies from Africa, the Americas and Spain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bates, D., Maechler M., Bolker B., & Walker S.
(2016) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–12. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/lme4​/index​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K.
(2007) Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82, 32–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) I’ll be the judge of that: diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37, 637–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21, 135–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Andrés, R.
(2002a) Juicios sobre la lengua asturiana. Oviedo: Ámbitu.Google Scholar
D’Andrés R.
(2002b) L’asturianu mínimu urbanu. Delles hipótesis. Lletres Asturianes 81, 21–38.Google Scholar
Docherty, G., & Foulkes, P.
(2014) An evaluation of usage-based approaches to the modelling of sociophonetic variability. Lingua 142, 42–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, K.
(2005a) From bad to bed: The relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo 48, 55–68.Google Scholar
(2005b) Social effects on the perception of DRESS and TRAP in New Zealand English (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
(2011) Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech 54, 99–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, K., Hay. J., & Walker, A.
(2010) Pronounced rivalries: attitudes and speech production. Te Reo 53, 27–53.Google Scholar
Drager, K., & Kirtley, M. J. (2016) Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In A. Babel (Ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research (pp.1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G.
(2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34, 409–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Arias, X. L.
(1982) Las lenguas minoritarias de la Península Ibérica. In F. Abad Nebot & A. García Berrio (Eds.), Introducción a la lingüística (pp.417–454). Madrid: Alhambra Universidad.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D.
(1996) Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 22, 1166–1183.Google Scholar
(1998) Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105, 251–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Quevedo, R.
(2001) The Asturian speech community. In M. T. Turell (Ed.), Multilingualism in Spain: Sociolinguistic and psycolinguistic aspects of linguistic minority groups (pp.165–182). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Drager, K.
(2010) Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48, 865–892. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K.
(2006a) From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review 23, 351–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K.
(2006b) Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34, 458–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., Strobl, C., & Zeileis, A.
(2015) Party: A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning. R package version 1.0–6. http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/party​/index​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K.
(2006) Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34, 485–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konvalinka, N. A.
(1985) La situación sociolingüística de Asturias. Lletres Asturianes 16, 29–65.Google Scholar
Levon, E.
(2007) Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36, 533–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levon, E., & Buchstaller, I.
(2015) Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 27, 319–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llera Ramo, F.
(2017) III Encuesta sociolingüística de Asturias: Avance de resultados. Uviéu: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
McGuire, G., & Babel, M.
(2015) Facial attractiveness facilitates voice processing. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. London: International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N.
(1999) The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18, 62–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.
(2001) Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and emergent grammar (pp.137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Plichta, B. (2012) Akustyk 1.9: a free Praat plug-in for sociolinguists (computer resource).Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J., Reynolds, J., Callier, P., & Baptiste, J.
(2015) Constraints on the social meaning of released /t/: A production and perception study of U.S. politicians. Language Variation and Change 27, 59–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R. Core Team
(2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Staum Casasanto, L.
(2010) What do listeners know about sociolinguistic variation? University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 37 15, 40–49.Google Scholar
Strand, E.
(1999) Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18, 86–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., & McGowan K.
(2014) The socially-weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Language Sciences 4, 1–13.Google Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G.
(2009) The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 487–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Baayen, H.
(2012) Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24, 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viejo Fernández, X.
(2004) Asturian: Resurgence and impending demise of a minority language in the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 170 , 169–190.Google Scholar
Warren, P., Hay, J., & Thomas, B.
(2007) The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. In J. Cole & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9 (pp.87–112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar