Cover not available
Part of
Amazonian Spanish: Language Contact and Evolution
Edited by Stephen Fafulas
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 23] 2020
► pp. 155–190

Chapter 7
Emerging ethnolinguistic varieties in the Amazon

The case of Yagua Spanish

 | University of Mississippi
 | College of Charleston
We analyze a handful of morphosyntactic features of Yagua Spanish (YS), a contact variety of Spanish spoken in the Amazon. Our results, from sociolinguistic interviews and film narrations conducted with 10 YS speakers from Comandancia, located along Peru’s Orosa River, suggest that YS is characterized by significant occurrence of leísmo, null direct objects, and non-canonical use of the Present Perfect. Analyses based on language proficiency reveal that the Yagua-dominant bilinguals, who learned Spanish primarily as adults, show higher rates of these non-pan-Latin American forms as compared to the Spanish-dominant bilinguals who acquired Spanish earlier in life. We explore the origins of these linguistic features and add to what is known of emerging varieties of Spanish in the Amazon region.
Keywords: Amazonian Spanish, Yagua, bilingualism, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Language contact and evolution
    • 2.2Amazonian Spanish
    • 2.3Andean Spanish
    • 2.4Yagua language
    • 2.5Yagua-Spanish contact
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Research questions and hypotheses
    • 3.2Methods and participants
    • 3.3Linguistic factors
      • 3.3.1Direct objects
      • 3.3.2Null direct objects
      • 3.3.3Object topicalization
      • 3.3.4Extended/non-canonical use of present perfect
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Object expression and leísmo
    • 4.2(Non)expression of direct objects
    • 4.3Direct object placement and topicalization
    • 4.4Present Perfect
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.23.07faf
References (91)
References
Adelaar, W. F., & Muysken, P. (2004). The languages of the Andes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012). The languages of the Amazon. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiades, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Arias, A. (2014). Actitudes lingüísticas en el Perú. Predominancia del castellano de las costa central y norte. In A. B. Chiquito & M. A. Quesada Pacheco (Eds.), Actitudes lingüísticas de los hispanohablantes hacia el idioma español y sus variantes (pp. 1185–1248). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, M., Yamamoto, A., Aikawa, N., Koundiouba, D., Minasyan, A., Dwyer, A., … & Smeets, R. (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. Paris, France: UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caravedo, R. (1997). Los pronombres objeto en un corpus del español amazónico peruano. Anuario de Letras, 35, 131–155.Google Scholar
Caravedo, R., & Klee, C. A. (2012). Migración y contacto en Lima: El pretérito perfecto en las cláusulas narrativas. Lengua y Migración 4(2), 5–24.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (Ed.). (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Choi, J. K. (2000). [-Person] direct object drop: The genetic cause of a syntactic feature in Paraguayan Spanish. Hispania, 83, 531–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, C. (2009). The linguistic legacy of Spanish and Portuguese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, C., & Yoon, J. (Eds.) (2006). Functional approaches to Spanish syntax: Lexical semantics, discourse, transitivity. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coronel-Molina, S., & Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2012). Introduction: Language contact in the Andes and Universal Grammar. Lingua, 122, 447–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crevels, M. (2012). Language endangerment in South America: The clock is ticking. In L. Campbell & V. Grondona (Eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide (pp. 167–233). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (Ed.) (2011). The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M., Fafulas, S., & Gradoville, M. (2011). Going retro: An analysis of the interplay between socioeconomic class and age in Caracas Spanish. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 65–78). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., & Aikhenvald, A. Y. (Eds.). (1999). The Amazonian languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1991). SVO Languages and the OV/VO typology. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 443–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumont, J. (2013). Another look at the present perfect in an Andean variety of Spanish: Grammaticalization and evidentiality in Quiteño Spanish. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prade Pérez & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 279–291). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1978). Variaciones sociolingüísticas en el castellano del Perú. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. M. (1997). Contrastive and innovative uses of the present perfect and the preterite in Spanish in contact with Quechua. Hispania, 80, 859–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Spanish in contact with Quechua. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 323–352). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D. (1989). Clitic doubling, reflexives, and word order alternations in Yagua. Language, 65, 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fafulas, S., Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M., & O’Rourke, E. (2016). Attitudes towards ‘nativeness’ and Peruvian Amazonian Spanish. Paper presented at 1er Simposio Internacional Sobre Actitudes ante Español, Portugués y Lenguas Relacionadas. Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Falcón Ccenta, P., Chumbile Vásquez, R., & Canturín Narrea, J. (2012). Características morfosintácticas del castellano amazónico en hablantes indígenas bilingües en Lima. Escritura y Pensamiento, 30, 79–112.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In J. Cole & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 9 (pp. 353–382). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fought, C. (2003). Chicano English in context. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Henriksen, N., & Fafulas, S. (2017). Prosodic timing and language contact: Spanish and Yagua in Amazonian Peru. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10(2), 225–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N., Fafulas, S., & O’Rourke, E. (to appear). Intervocalic phonemic stop realization in Amazonian Peru: The case of Yagua Spanish. In R. Rao (Ed.), Spanish phonetics and phonology in contact: Studies from Africa, the Americas, and Spain.
Howe, C. (2013). The Spanish perfects: Pathways of emergent meaning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, C. & Schwenter, S. (2003). Present perfect for preterite across Spanish dialects. Papers from NWAV 31. U. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 61–75.Google Scholar
Howe, C., & Schwenter, S. (2008). Variable constraints on past reference in dialects of Spanish. In M. Westmoreland & J. A. Thomas (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 100–108). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., & O’Rourke, E. (Eds.) (2012). The handbook of Hispanic linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jara Yupanqui, M. (2012). Peruvian Amazonian Spanish: Linguistic variation, social meaning and identities. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6, 445–469.Google Scholar
(2013). El perfecto en el español de Lima: Variación y cambio en situación de contacto lingüístico. Lima, Peru: Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Jara Yupanqui, M., & P. Valenzuela. (2013). El uso del perfecto en secuencias narrativas en el español peruano amazónico: El caso de Jeberos, Lexis 37(1), 33–70.Google Scholar
Klee, C. A. (2009). Migration and globalization: Their effects on contact varieties of Latin American Spanish. In M. Lacorte & J. Leeman (Eds.), Español en Estados Unidos y en otros contextos de contacto: Sociolingüística, ideología y pedagogía (pp. 39–66). Madrid, Spain: Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klee, C. A., & Caravedo, R. (2005). Contact-induced language change in Lima, Peru: The case of clitic pronouns. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 12–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Klee, C., & Caravedo, R. (2006). Andean Spanish and the Spanish of Lima: Linguistic variation and change in contact situation. In C. Mar-Molinero & M. Stewart (Eds.), Globalization and language in Spanish-speaking world (pp. 94–113). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klee, C., & Ocampo, A. (1995). The expression of past reference in Spanish-Quechua bilingual speakers. In C. Silva-Corvalán (Ed.), Spanish in four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism (pp. 52–70). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Klee, C. A., Tight, D., & Caravedo, R. (2011). Variation and change in Peruvian word order: The impact of migration to Lima. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 30, 5–31.Google Scholar
Klein-Andreu, F. (1992). Understanding standards. In G. W. Davis & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), Explanation in historical linguistics (pp. 167–178). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, L., & Ansaldo, U. (2016). Languages in contact. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1994). Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2014). The many facets of Spanish dialect diversification in Latin America. In S. Mufwene (Ed.), Iberian imperialism and language evolution in Latin America (pp. 38–75). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López Meirama, B. (2006). Semantic and discourse-pragmatic factors in Spanish word order. In J. C. Clements & J. Yoon (Eds.), Functional approaches to Spanish syntax. Lexical semantics, discourse and transitivity (pp. 7–52). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyon, P. (1974). Native South American Indian languages. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marticorena, M. (2010). El castellano amazónico del Perú. Iquitos, Peru: Instituto de Investigaciones Educativas e Históricas de la Amazonía Peruana.Google Scholar
Michnowicz, J. (2009). Intervocalic voiced stops in Yucatan Spanish: A case of contact induced language change? In M. Lacorte & J. Leeman (Eds.), Español en Estados Unidos y en otros contextos de contacto: Sociolingüística, ideología y pedagogía (pp. 67–84). Madrid, Spain: Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Dialect standardization in Mérida, Yucatán: The case of /bdɡ/. Revista Internacional de Lingüistica Iberoamericana, 18, 191–212.Google Scholar
Montes Rodríguez, M. E. (2009). Español de contacto, español andino y español amazónico: Estudios de caso en comunidades sikuani, wayú y tikuna. In A. M. Escobar & W. Wölck (Eds.), Contacto lingüístico y la emergencia de variantes y variedades lingüísticas (pp. 93–125). Madrid, Spain/Frankfurt, Germany: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge, UK: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. (1984). The Spanish that Quechua speakers learn: L2 learning as norm-governed behavior. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 101–19). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ocampo, F. (1989). The pragmatics of word order in spoken Rioplatense Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
(1994). The word order of two-constituent constructions in spoken Spanish. In P. Dowing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 425–447). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ocampo, F., & Klee, C. (1995). Spanish OV/VO word-order variation in Spanish/Quechua bilingual speakers. In C. Silva-Corvalán (Ed.), Spanish in four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism (pp. 71–82). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Spanish in contact in the Peruvian Amazon: An examination of intervocalic voiced stops. In E. Willis, P. M. Butragueño, & E. H. Zendejas (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology (pp. 145–162). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Paredes, L. (1996). The Spanish continuum in Peruvian bilingual speakers: A study of verbal clitics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Paredes, L., & Valdez, M. (2008). Language contact and change: Direct object leísmo in Andean Spanish. In M. Westmoreland & J. A. Thomas (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 140–148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Parodi, C., Luna, K., & Helmer, A. (2012). Bifurcación de una norma: El leísmo en el Viejo y el Nuevo Mundo. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 89, 217–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. L. (1985). Aspects of the grammar of Yagua (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
(1986). Basic constituent order in Yagua clauses: Implications for word order universals. In D. Derbyshire & G. Pullum (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (Vol. 1, pp. 440–465). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Source of the Yagua nominal classification system. International Journal of American Linguistics, 73, 447–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. L., & Payne, T. E. (1990). Yagua. In D. Derbyshire & G. Pullum (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (Vol. 2, pp. 249–474). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2013). Language maintenance and shift. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 321–339). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramírez, L. H. (2003). El español amazónico hablado en el Perú. Lima, Peru: Juan Gutemberg Editores.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Cruz, H. (2012). Spanish in indigenous lands. In C. Patiño & J. Bernal (Eds.), Language in Colombia (pp. 673–693). Bogotá, Colombia: Academia Colombiana de la Lengua & Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
(2018). Yo no le conocí a mi abuela: use of clitics le, lo, and la in Amazonian Colombian Spanish. In J. King & S. Sessarego (eds.), Language variation and contact-induced change: Spanish across Space and Time (pp. 175–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reig Alamillo, A. (2009). Cross-dialectal variation in propositional anaphora: null objects and propositional lo in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 21, 381–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, C., & Howe, C. (2010). Perfect potential: Semantic change in narrative contexts across Spanish. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, VIII, 157–176.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. & Fafulas, S. (2016). Double possession in Peruvian Amazonian Spanish. In A. Cuza, L. Czerwionka, & D. Olson (Eds.), Inquires in Hispanic linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence (pp. 335–354). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Sosa, D. (2008). The use of past tenses in the Spanish of Lima: Variation in a situation of contact. In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 265–275). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (2010). Language contact in the USA. In K. Potowski (Ed.), Language diversity in the USA (pp. 25–46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S. (2006). Null objects across South America. In T. Face & C. Klee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 23–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S., & Silva, G. (2002). Overt vs. null direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese: A semantic/pragmatic account. Hispania, 85, 577–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and interdeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Enrique-Arias, A. (2017). Sociolingüistica y pragmática del español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2016). Digging into dominance: A closer look at language dominance in bilinguals. In C. Silva-Corvalán & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 1–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vallejos, R. (2014). Peruvian Amazonian Spanish: Uncovering variation and deconstructing stereotypes. Spanish in Context, 11, 425–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, K., & Kaiser, G. A. (2003). Animacy, specificity, and definiteness in Spanish. In K. von Heusinger & G. A. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Semantic and syntactic aspects of specificity in Romance languages” (pp. 41–65). Konstanz, Germany: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English: Dialects and variation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, R. (2006). Etapas para la comprensión del proceso de quechuización del nororiente peruano. Boletín de Estudios Amazónicos, 1(2), 47–70.Google Scholar