Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language
Edited by Karina Veronica Molsing, Cristina Becker Lopes Perna and Ana Maria Tramunt Ibaños
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 24] 2020
► pp. 83–106

Multi-directionality in language transfer

Development of the vowel system of Brazilian Portuguese as a second (L2) or third language (L3)

 | Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing
 | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
This study addresses the multi-directionality of vowel transfer by L1 Riverplate Spanish learners of Brazilian Portuguese. We verify the influence of the second language (L2) and the third language (L3) on the production of the mother tongue (L1). Our results showed that (1) the development of the Brazilian Portuguese vowel system was highly dependent on the language systems the participants had previously acquired, and (2) the presence of an L2 or L3 system also affected the L1 (and the L2 system, in the case of the acquisition of an L3). These results shed some light on the multi-directionality of language transfer, as they show that all language systems are in constant development and interaction throughout the whole lifespan.
Keywords: multilingualism, complex dynamic systems, vowel transfer
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Basic characteristics of complex adaptive systems
  • The present study
    • Research questions and procedures
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Tasks
    • Results
      • The effect of additional language systems on L1 production
      • The effect of the L1 and L2 systems on L3 production
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.24.04per
References (38)
References
Alves, M. A. (2015). Estudo dos parâmetros acústicos relacionados à produção das plosivas do Português Brasileiro na fala adulta: Análise acústico-quantitativa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Amaro, J., Iverson, M. (2018). Third language acquisition. In K. Geeslin (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of Spanish linguistics (pp. 737–757). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, C. A. (2013). A influência grafo-fônico-fonológica na produção oral e no processamento de priming em multilíngues: uma perspectiva dinâmica (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2016). A transferência grafo-fônico-fonológica em multilíngues falantes de português, espanhol, e inglês: Uma abordagem dinâmica. In Alves, U. K. (Ed). Aquisição fonético-fonológica de língua estrangeira: Investigações Rio-Grandenses e Argentinas em discussão (pp. 209–228). Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.22). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Beckner, C. (2015). Emergence at the cross-linguistic level: Attractor dynamics in language change. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds), The handbook of language emergence. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 8–20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (2017). Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory: Same or different? In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 51–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic System Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M. (2013). Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. del P. Garcia Mayo, M. J. Gutiérrez Mangado & M. Martinez-Adrián (Eds), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2011). The emergence of language as a Complex Adaptive System. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 654–667). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. [2009 (1998)]. Connectionism, artificial life, and dynamical systems: New approaches to old questions. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science. Oxford: Basil Blackwood.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 233–267). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, E. (2009). Caos/complexidade na interação humana. In V. L. M. Oliveira e Paiva & M. Nascimento (Eds), Sistemas adaptativos complexos: Lingua(gem) e aprendizagem (pp. 73–92). Belo Horizonte: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Gallardo Del Puerto, F. (2007). Is L3 phonological competence affected by the learner’s level of bilingualism? International Journal of Multilingualism, 4(1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamical model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Jrl Syst Sci & Complexity, 19, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 41(1), 15–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, now you don’t. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1986). An eye for an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In E. Kellerman & M. S. Smith (Eds), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–48). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Complex, dynamics systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45(2), 202–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Complexity Theory: A new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 369–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereyron, L. (2017). A produção vocálica por falantes de espanhol (L1), inglês (L2) e português (L3): Uma perspectiva dinâmica na (multi) direcionalidade da transferência linguística (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). <[URL]>
Rothman, J. (2013). Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 romance. In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011 (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, G. (2014). Percepção e produção das vogais médias do espanhol por falantes do português brasileiro (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Santos, G., & Rauber, A. (2016). Percepção e produção das vogais médias do espanhol/LE. In U. K. Alves (Ed.), Aquisição fonético-fonológica de língua estrangeira: Investigações Rio-Grandenses e Argentinas em discussão (pp. 151–178). Campinas, SP: Pontes.Google Scholar
Silva, A. H. P. (2014). Organização temporal de encontros vocálicos no Português Brasileiro e a relação entre Fonética e Fonologia. Letras de Hoje, 49(1), 11–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available at <[URL]> (30 July, 2015).
Van Gelder, T., & Port, R. (1995). It’s about time: An overview of the dynamics approach to Cognition. In T. Van Gelder & R. Port (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zimmer, M., & Alves, U. K. (2012). Uma visão dinâmica da produção da fala em L2: O caso da dessonorização terminal. Revista da Abralin, XI(1), 221–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar