Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language
Edited by Karina Veronica Molsing, Cristina Becker Lopes Perna and Ana Maria Tramunt Ibaños
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 24] 2020
► pp. 109–148

The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis

Off-line evidence from Chinese learners of European Portuguese as an L2

 | University of Saint Joseph
 | University of Macau
This chapter investigates the acquisition of tense and aspect by Chinese learners of Portuguese as an L2 from a variationist perspective (Bayley, 2013). Difficulties in acquiring the aspectual contrasts set by the Perfect Preterit and Imperfect Preterit tenses in Romance languages have been widely documented (Blyth, 2005; Giacalone-Ramat, 2002; Kihlstedt, 2002; Martins, 2008). This study investigates the role of <lexical aspect> for the marking of Perfect and Imperfect Preterit following the tenets of the Lexical Aspect Hypothesis (LAH). It intends to design a different look into the LAH, as it considers other variables in interaction. Results show that lexical aspect plays a significant role in the learners’ use of inflectional morphology for both verb tenses, showing the dynamics of the interlanguage continuum.
Keywords: Aspect Hypothesis, SLA, L2 verbal morphology, Portuguese, Chinese
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis: Literature review
    • 1.1The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis: LAH
    • 1.2The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis in Romance languages
  • 2.Inflectional morphology
    • 2.1Variation
  • 3.The categories of tense and aspect in Portuguese and Chinese
    • 3.1Tense and aspect in Portuguese
    • 3.2Tense and aspect in Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese)
      • 3.2.1Cantonese
  • 4.Verb semantics: identification of verb properties
  • 5.The study: Methodological procedures
    • 5.1Introduction
    • 5.2Participants
    • 5.3Instruments of data collection
  • 6.Discussion of the results
    • 6.1Results for Perfect Preterit: Discussion
      • 6.1.1Lexical aspect
      • 6.1.2Length of exposure
    • 6.2Results for Imperfect Preterit
      • 6.2.1Grammatical aspect
      • 6.2.2Type of task
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.24.05mar
References (72)
References
Andersen, R. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquistion. In T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Cross-currents in second language acquistion and linguistics theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). The dimensions of pastness. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 79–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The Pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ao, S. H. (2013). Aquisição de morfologia verbal do português Europeu: Um caso de aprendentes de chinês-L1 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Macau.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. (2005). The acquisition of tese and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In D. Ayoun & M.R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect on Romance languages (pp.79–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, R. (2005). Towards a comprehensive model of the acquisition of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In D. Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 253–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics – Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 471–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past-tense marking in Chinese-English. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 157–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2013). Data analysis: Quantitative approaches. In R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 357–390). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, A. (1995). The expression of past temporal reference by English-speaking learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google Scholar
Blyth, C. (2005). From empirical findings to the teaching of aspectual distinctions. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 211–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H. J., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50(2), 333–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2008). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, H. L. (2012). Tense-aspect processing in second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Chen, J., & Shirai, Y. (2010). The development of aspectual marking in Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2006). The aspect hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56(2), 201–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L., & Pérez Saldanya, M. (2005). Grammaticalization and language acquisition: Interaction of lexical aspect and discourse. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 44–55). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duff, P., & Duanduan, L. (2002). The acquisition and use of perfective aspect in Mandarin. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 417–456). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). Variability and the natural order hypothesis. In R. M. Barasch & C. Vaughn James (Eds.), Beyond the monitor model – Comments on current theory and practice in second language acquisition (pp. 139–158). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Gabriele, A., Martohardjono, G., & McClure, W. (2005). Evaluating the role of the L1 in the L2 acquisition of aspect: A study of Japanese learners of English. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biligualism (pp. 808–826). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gabriele, A., & Maekawa, J. (2008). Interpreting tense in a second language. Eurosla Yearbook, 8, 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasbún, L. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense/aspect in L2 Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Kanno, K. (1998). Consistency and variation in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 14(4), 376–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kihlstedt, M. (2002). Reference to past events in dialogue: The acquisition of tense and aspect by advanced learners of French. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 323–362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change – Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: How do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, 17(4), 393–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. (1989). Mandarin Chinese – A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Ping. (1990). Aspect and aktionsart in child Mandarin (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Leiden University.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquistion of lexical and gramatical aspect. Berlin: Mouten De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. (2016). Efeitos de transferência semântica no processo de aquisição da morfologia verbal por aprendentes chineses de português como L2 (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Macau.Google Scholar
Moens, M., Y Steedman, M. T. (1987). Temporal ontology in natural language. In Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1–7). Stroudsburg, PA: ACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, C. (2008). A aquisição das noções de tempo e aspecto por aprendentes chineses de português como língua estrangeira (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Macau.Google Scholar
Mathews, S., & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McManus, K. (2011). The development of aspect in a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, UK.Google Scholar
Oliveira, F. (2003). Tempo e aspecto. In M. H. M. Mateus, A. M. Brito, I. Duarte, I. Hub Faria (Eds.), Gramática da língua portuguesa. Lisbon: Caminho.Google Scholar
Oliveira, F., & Lopes, A. (1995). Tense and aspect in Portuguese. In R. Thieroff (Ed.), Tense systems in european languages, Vol. II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paolillo, J. C. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation – Statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Pieneman, M. (2007). Variation and dynamic systems in SLA. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 43–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. (1996). Variation linguistics and second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 229–268). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rebelo, C. M. B. (2010). Aquisição morfológica de perfeito e imperfeito em português L2. (Unpublished masters thesis). FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocca, S. (2002). Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: a bi-directional study. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 249–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Italian tense-aspect morphology in child L2 acquisition. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 129–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (2008). Variation. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410–435). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rossi, F. (2009). Connectionist modelling of aspect acquisition in Italian L2. Eurosla Yearbook 9, 4–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2008). Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. Language Acquisition, 15, 270–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting: Irregular and frequent morphology. System, 28, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Tense and aspect in the selection of Spanish past tense verbal morphology. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 323–362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition – A theoretical model. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010). Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R., & Lopez Ortega, N. (1998). Accurate L2 production across language tasks: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control. Modern Language Journal, 82, 514–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R., & Shirai, Y. (2002). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R., & Ayoun, D. (2005). The development of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2004). A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In J. Williams, B. VanPatten, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 91–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2009). How is inflectional morphology learned? Eurosla Yearbook, 9, 56–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R. (2003). Second language acquisition research in search of an interface. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese – A corpus based-study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). A corpus-based constrastive study of English and Chinese. New York / London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, R., & Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 253–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar