Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language
Edited by Karina Veronica Molsing, Cristina Becker Lopes Perna and Ana Maria Tramunt Ibaños
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 24] 2020
► pp. 283–297

The linguistic and anthropological dimensions within enunciation in additional languages

A look at a Portuguese language instructional setting

 | University of Arizona
Drawing from enunciative linguistics (Benveniste, 1966; 1974) and the anthropology of enunciation (Dessons, 2006), this study suggests that both teacher and student discourses are rooted in speaker and language analyst categories. Analysis of dialogues between a teacher and her students in a Portuguese as an additional language classroom revealed two mechanisms: (1) the teacher’s history of utterances, and (2) the learners’ inquiries. Both mechanisms address reorganization of form and meaning based on previous experiences in the language. Importance of language awareness and implications for teacher education are discussed.
Keywords: Portuguese as an additional language, discourse, enunciation, teacher education, Benveniste
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Discourse positioning: Speakers and language analysts
    • 1.1Intersubjectivity as the main element of culture
    • 1.2The linguistic and anthropological dimensions within enunciation
  • 2.Context
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Implications
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.24.11som
References (11)
References
Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
(1971). Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
(1974). Problemas de linguística geral II. Campinas, SP: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Dessons, G. (2006). Émile Benveniste: l’Invention du discours. Paris: Limoges.Google Scholar
Flores, V. N. (2013). Introdução à teoria enunciativa de Émile Benveniste. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
(2017). Atualidade de Benveniste no Brasil: Os aspectos antropológicos de uma teoria da enunciação. Revista Desenredo, 13(1), 706–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Normand, C. (2009). Convite à linguística. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Schlatter, M. (2000). Inimiga ou aliada? O papel da cultura no ensino de língua estrangeira. In F. Indursky & M. do Carmo Campos (Eds.), Discurso, memória, identidade (pp. 517–527). Porto Alegre: Sangra Luzzato.Google Scholar
Surreaux, L. M. (2010). O “efeito de transcrição” na escuta de falas desviantes: Uma leitura enunciativa. In Anais do SITED – Seminário Internacional de Texto, Enunciação e Discurso. Porto Alegre: PUCRS.Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, H. (2002). Language in language teacher education: A discourse perspective. In H. Trappes-Lomax & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Language in language teacher education (pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. (2002). Doing language awareness: Issues for language study in language teacher education. In H. Trappes-Lomax & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Language in language teacher education (pp. 113–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar