Cover not available
Part of
Hispanic Linguistics: Current issues and new directions
Edited by Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow and Cristina Sanz
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26] 2020
► pp. 75–94

What derivational suffixes should we teach in Spanish as a Second Language courses?

 | University of California, Davis
 | Denison University
 | University of California-Davis
Morphological awareness in a second language (L2) enhances depth of vocabulary knowledge and is better developed when taught explicitly than by mere exposure to morphologically complex words. However, suffixes are not sufficiently treated in L2 textbooks, and little is known about which suffixes should be taught and which suffixes are more easily learned. Based on a corpus analysis of Spanish L1 and L2 speakers, as well as a correlational study about the characteristics of Spanish suffixes, this paper proposes 12 derivational suffixes that should be introduced in Spanish L2 classrooms.
Keywords: corpus, L2 learners, Spanish, textbooks, suffixes, derivational morphology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Spanish derivational morphology
    • 2.2L2 derivational morphology instruction
    • 2.3Suffixes characteristics
    • 2.4Research questions
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1CEDEL2 corpus (L2 learners and native speakers)
    • 3.2Textbook corpus
    • 3.3Selection and analysis of the suffixes in the corpora
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Distribution of suffixes across corpora
    • 4.2Lexical innovations in CEDEL2
    • 4.3Characteristics influencing suffixal learning
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.04san
References (53)
References
Anthony, L. (2016). AntConc (3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from <[URL]> (6 November, 2019).Google Scholar
Avant Assessment. (2016). Avant STAMP Results-National Averages 2016.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2011). What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to? Language Teaching Research, 15(83), 83–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). A common European framework of reference for learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedline, B. (2011). Challenges in the second language acquisition of derivational morphology: From theory to practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55(1), 27–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, M., & Nassaji, H. (2012). Ease of inferencing, learner inferential strategies, and their relationship with retention of word meanings inferred from context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(1), 54–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Instituto Cervantes. (2006). Plan curricular del instituto cervantes. Niveles de referencia para el español. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes-Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second-language learning to read. In K. Koda & A. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages. Cross-linguistic relationships in first and second-language literacy development (pp. 68–96). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, M. F. (2009). Formación de palabras en español. Morfología derivativa productiva en el léxico moderno. (A. Miranda Poza, Trans. 4th ed.). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Lozano, C., & Mendikoetxea, C. (2013). Learner corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2. In A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 65–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, Z. P.-S., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles and possessive ´s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos Miguel, N. (2012). Grapho-morphological awareness in L2 Spanish: How do L2 learners use this metalinguistic skill? Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 195–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Analyzing instruction and learning of derivational morphology in the Spanish foreign language classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K. (2000). An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, R. (2003). Derivational morphological analysis as a strategy for vocabulary acquisition in Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 200–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Building depth of Spanish L2 vocabulary by building and using word families. Hispania, 89(1), 170–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 Vocabulary learning from context: strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 387–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neary-Sundquist, C. A. (2015). Aspects of vocabulary knowledge in German textbooks. Foreign Language Annals, 48(1), 68–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Observatori de Neologia. (2009). Neologismes documentats en textos escrits en castellà (2001–2009). Retrieved from <[URL]> (6 November, 2019).Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. (2001). Diccionario de la lengua española (Online 22nd ed.). Retrieved from <[URL]> (6 November, 2019).Google Scholar
. (2011). Nueva gramática básica de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robles García, P., & Sánchez Gutiérrez, C. (2016). La morfología derivativa en los manuales de español estadounidenses: Un estudio exploratorio. Revista de la asociación española de lingüística aplicada, 15(1), 70–86.Google Scholar
Sánchez Gutiérrez, C. (2013). Priming morfológico y conciencia morfológica. Una investigación con estudiantes norteamericanos de E/LE (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. DOI logo
(2014). Morfología derivativa y manuales de E/LE: Un análisis crítico. Anexos de la Revista Española de Lexicografía, 31, 163–178.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4) 913–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. InS. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
University of Wisconsin. (1998). The university of Wisconsin college-level placement test: Spanish (Grammar) [Form 96M]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1195–1216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Textbooks corpus
Álvarez, M. A., Blanco, A., Gómez, M. L., y Pérez, N. (2006). Sueña 1. Madrid: Anaya.Google Scholar
Bartolomé, M. P., Blanco, A. I., Aizugaray, P., y López, L. (2006). Mañana 2. Madrid: Anaya.Google Scholar
Borobio, V., y Palencia, R. (2011). ELE Actual 1. Madrid: SM.Google Scholar
(2012). ELE Actual 2. Madrid: SM.Google Scholar
Castro, F., Díaz, P., Rodero, I., y Sardinero, C. (2005). Español en marcha. Nivel básico. Madrid: SGEL.Google Scholar
Castro, F., Marín, F., Morales, R., y Rosa, S. (2007). Nuevo Ven 1. Madrid: Edelsa.Google Scholar
Corpas, J., Garmendia, A., y Soriano, C. (2005). Aula Internacional I. Madrid: Difusión.Google Scholar
(2005). Aula Internacional II. Madrid: Difusión.Google Scholar
Equipo Prisma (V.V.A.A.). (2002). Prisma 1 Comienza. Madrid: Edinumen.Google Scholar
. (2002). Prisma 2 Continúa. Madrid: Edinumen.Google Scholar
. (2007). Español Lengua Viva 1. Salamanca: Santillana.Google Scholar
González, A., y Romero, C. (2008). ECO1. Madrid: Edelsa.Google Scholar
López, S., y Miñano, J. (2009). Destino Erasmus I. Madrid: SGEL.Google Scholar
Sánchez, J., Moreno, C., y Santos, I. (2005). Nuevo Español Sin Fronteras 1. Madrid: SGEL.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Feijoo, Sara & Mariona Anglada
2024. Multimodal input in the foreign language classroom: the use of hand gesture to teach morphology in L2 Spanish. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.