Cover not available
Part of
Hispanic Linguistics: Current issues and new directions
Edited by Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow and Cristina Sanz
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26] 2020
► pp. 119–136

The Progressive-to-Imperfective shift

Contextually determined variation in Rioplatense, Iberian, and Mexican Altiplano Spanish

| Yale University
| The Ohio State University
| Yale University
Spanish has two markers (claimed to be in free alternation) to convey that an event is in progress at reference time: the Simple Present (e.g., canta, ‘sings’) and the Present Progressive (e.g., está cantando, ‘is singing’). Based on evidence from sentence acceptability studies in three different Spanish dialects, we show that the distribution of the two markers is not random, but sensitive to contextual modulation. Specifically, results show that the (ambiguous) Simple Present is more acceptable in contexts where interlocutors share perceptual access to the event at issue. Otherwise, participants favor the (unambiguous) Present Progressive. We conclude that this variation reflects and is constrained by the well-attested grammaticalization path in which progressive markers gradually generalize to become imperfective markers.
Keywords: grammaticalization, variation, progressive, imperfective, context modulation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphosemantic considerations of the Progressive-to-Imperfective shift
    • 2.1A synchronic characterization of the Progressive and Imperfective meanings
    • 2.2The grammaticalization path from prog to impf
  • 3.The Spanish Progressive and Imperfective markers
  • 4.An experimental study in three dialects of Spanish
    • 4.1Methods
      • 4.1.1Materials
    • 4.2Procedure
    • 4.3Subjects
    • 4.4Predictions
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.06fuc
References (19)
References
Bates, D, Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deo, A. (2006). Tense and aspect in Indo-Aryan languages: Variation and diachrony (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
(2009). Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 475–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics and Pragmatics, 8, 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández de Castro, F. (1999). Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NGRAE = Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española (2009). Las perífrasis verbales. In Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española, 2105–2222. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Qualtrics. (2015). Qualtrics Platform. Provo, UT: Qualtrics.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Raz, S. (1983). Tigre grammar and texts. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Roca Pons, J. (1958). Estudios sobre perífrasis verbales del español. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. (2012). Grammaticalization through inherent variability: The development of a progressive in Spanish. Studies in Language, 36, 73–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. <[URL]>
Yllera, A. (1999). Las perífrasis verbales de gerundio y participio. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 3390–3441). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Berríos, Juan & Matthew Kanwit
2024. Progressive aspect across temporalities: variation between synthetic and analytic forms in L1 and L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Fernández Jaén, Jorge
2023. The present tense as a mark of evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Spanish. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Martín & Maria Mercedes Piñango
2021. Language variation and change through an experimental lens. In Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 12], ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Martín, María Mercedes Piñango & Ashwini Deo
2021. Operationalizing the Role of Context in Language Variation: The Role of Perspective Alignment in the Spanish Imperfective Domain. In Concepts, Frames and Cascades in Semantics, Cognition and Ontology [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 7], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.