Cover not available
Part of
Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 215–232

Chapter 10
Developing epistemic meaning

A diachronic study of the Spanish adverb a lo mejor

 | Indiana University
The present paper focuses on the development of the Spanish adverb a lo mejor, originally meaning ‘to the best’ as it develops from a prepositional phrase indicating a destination or goal to an epistemic modal adverb which expresses the speaker’s doubt concerning the proposition. It is shown that the semantic change came about due to a combination of local and contextual factors. Chief among them is the pre-verbal positioning of a lo mejor, its occurrence with achievement predicates, and implications of futurity. In becoming an epistemic adverb, the change follows Traugott’s Tendency III for semantic change which states that “meanings tend to become increasingly based in the speaker’s subjective belief state/attitude toward the proposition” (1989, p. 35).
Keywords: semantic change, epistemic modality, subjectification, lexical aspect
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A lo mejor in synchrony
  • 3.Diachronic functions of a lo mejor
    • 3.1The 14th and 15th centuries: Directionality and use as a manner adjunct
    • 3.2The 16th and 17th centuries: Temporal use and temporal-modal use
    • 3.3Epistemic use
  • 4.Semantic change
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Other factors affecting the semantic development of a lo mejor
    • 5.2Subjectification
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.10jar
References (20)
References
Bosque, I., & Moreno, J. C. (1990). Las construcciones con lo y la denotación del neutro. Lingüística, 2, 5–50.Google Scholar
Butt, J., & Benjamin, C. (2013). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins R., & Pagliuca W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, A. (2014). Manual de gramática del Español. Buenos Aires: Waldhuter Editores.Google Scholar
DRAE. Real Academia Española. (2001). Diccionario de la lengua española (vigésima segunda edición). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Ernst, T. (2004). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1965). The “neuter” in Romance: A pseudo-problem. Word, 21(3), 421–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NTLLE. Real Academia Español. Nuevo tesoro lexigráfico de la lengua española [en línea]. Retrieved from <[URL]> (13 November, 2019).
Ojeda, A. E. (1982). Degree relatives and the neuter article in Spanish. In K. Tuite, R. Schneider, & R. Chametzky (Eds.). Papers from the Eighteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 407–418). Chicago, IL: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Salazar, C. (2013). A lo mejor, lo mismo. De la comparación y la identidad a la modalización epistémica. In M. P. Garcés (Ed.), Adverbios con función discursiva. Procesos de formación y evolución (pp. 201–238). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. (2009). Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CORDE) [en línea]. Corpus diacrónico del español. <[URL]> (13 November, 2019).
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [en línea]. Corpus diacrónico del español. <[URL]> (13 November, 2019).
Santos Río, L. (2003): Diccionario de partículas. Madrid: Luso-Española de Ediciones.Google Scholar
Suárez Hernández, A. (2018). Análisis diacrónico de adverbios con función discursiva: Hacia una descripción lexicográfica. San Millán de la Cogolla, Spain: Fundación San Millán de la Cogolla.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1), 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. & Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics and philosophy, Ch. 4. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar