Chapter published in:
Advancedness in Second Language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities
Edited by Mandy R. Menke and Paul A. Malovrh
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 31] 2021
► pp. 96–114

The role of late-acquired structures in advanced oral proficiency

A consideration of complexity and variability as indicators of development

| University of South Carolina
| University of Minnesota
The present chapter focuses on one aspect of Byrnes & Ortega’s (2008) description of advancedness; it considers the notion of structural command, not merely in terms of accuracy, but also the multifunctional use of late-acquired complex structures, which we assert provides another window through which we should observe interlanguage (IL) development and advanced oral production. It defines late-acquired structures as those that consist of complex (multiple) form-meaning associations and are only learned once IL development has reached a stage in which L2 learners are able to notice, process, and produce target language on a multifunctional level involving multiple linguistic systems. This definition allows us to problematize advanced grammar in terms of how we identify it and how we understand advancedness.
Keywords: L2 Spanish, advanced proficiency, late-acquired structures, concept-oriented approach
Published online: 08 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.05mal
References

References

Alarcón, I.
(2006) The second language acquisition of Spanish gender agreement: The effects of linguistics variables on accuracy. Munich, Germany: Lincom.Google Scholar
(2009) The processing of gender agreement in L1 and L2 Spanish: Evidence from reaction time data. Hispania, 92, 814–828.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.
(1983) Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1984) Second languages: A crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1989) The theoretical status of variation in interlanguage development. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Pyscholinguistic issues (pp. 46–64). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Barber, H. & Carreiras, M.
(2005) Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(1994) Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning, 44, 243–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004) The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In M. Overstreet, S. Rott, B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Form and meaning in second language acquisition (pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015) One functional approach to SLA: The concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 54–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19(4), 419–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Ortega, L.
(Eds.) (2008) The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carminati, M. N.
(2005) Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy (Person> Number> Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua, 115, 259–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, A. & Kilborn, K.
(1991) Functionalist linguistics: Discourse structure and language processing in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Cross currents in second language acquisition (pp. 195–224). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R., Wolfgang, K., & Noyau, C.
(1995) The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A., Gudmestad, A., & Donaldson, B.
(2017) A concept-oriented analysis of future-time reference in native and near-native Hexagonal French. Journal of French Language Studies, 27(3), 381–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
(2005) Analyzing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franceschina, F.
(2001) Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Case and phi-feature agreement in advances in L2 Spanish grammars. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, T. Ruthenberg, & M. L. Poschen (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook 2 (pp. 71–86). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2005) Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L.
(2003) A comparison of copula choice: Native Spanish speakers and advanced learners. Language Learning, 53, 703–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Gudmestad, A.
(2008) Variable subject expression in second-language Spanish: A comparison of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 second language research forum (pp. 69–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gillon Dowens, M., Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M.
(2009) Morpho-syntactic processing in late L2 learners: ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Science, 22, 1870–1887.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A.
(2012) Acquiring a variable structure: An interlanguage analysis of second language mood use in Spanish. Language Learning, 62, 373–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Advanced-level mood distinction. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 343–360). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non- native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
(Ed.) (2016) Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M.
(2017) What we gain by combining variationist and concept-oriented approaches: The case of acquiring Spanish future-time expression. Language Learning, 67, 461–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Geeslin, K. L.
(2014) The interpretation of Spanish subjunctive and indicative forms in adverbial clauses: A cross-sectional study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 487–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Solon, M.
(2013) Acquiring variation in future-time expression abroad in Valencia, Spain and Mérida, Mexico. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 206–221). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Klee, C. A.
(1989) The acquisition of clitic pronouns in the Spanish interlanguage of Peruvian Quechua speakers. Hispania, 72, 402–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malovrh, P. A.
(2014) Variability and systematicity in interlanguage development: An analysis of mode and its effect on L2 Spanish morphology. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7, 43–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malovrh, P. A., & Benati, A. G.
(Eds.) (2018) The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malovrh, P. A., & Lee, J. F.
(2010) Connections between processing, production and placement: Acquiring object pronouns in Spanish as a second language. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 231–255). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The developmental dimension in instructed second language learning: The L2 acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Malovrh, P. A. & Moreno, N.
(2018) Meeting the demands of globalization: One goal of ISLA research. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 199–218). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, C.
(2008) Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24, 459–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.
(1987) Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C. W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition practices (pp. 206–224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2007) Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 180–207). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Second language learning explained? SLA across ten contemporary theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 245–272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J.
(2010) The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120, 2022–2039. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2018) Inflectional morphology. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 381–400). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
(2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh- interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1990) The acquisition of clitic pronouns in Spanish: Two case studies. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language learning/foreign language learning (118–139). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E.
(2008) Null objects in second language acquisition: Grammatical versus performance models. Second Language Research, 24, 65–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar