Cover not available
Part of
Advancedness in Second Language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities
Edited by Mandy R. Menke and Paul A. Malovrh
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 31] 2021
► pp. 351–366

Chapter 15
Advancing notions of advancedness

Clarifying the differential and dynamic effects of working memory across the second language proficiency spectrum

 | George Mason University
The variable process and outcomes of language learning in adulthood has motivated decades of research seeking to explain this variability via learner individual differences (IDs). However, the impact of learner IDs across the proficiency spectrum remains unclear, particularly the involvement of cognitive resources at advanced second language (L2) proficiency. This chapter provides an overview of learner ID research with a focus on the role of working memory capacity (WMC) in relation to L2 Spanish, revealing a lack of research probing the effects of WMC both between and within learners at varying proficiency. The chapter concludes by calling for more longitudinal research that investigates how cognitive ability interacts with socioculturally-grounded, rather than psycholinguistically-oriented, notions of advancedness and considers potential pedagogical implications.
Keywords: learner individual differences, advanced language proficiency, working memory, longitudinal research
Article outline
  • Notions and operationalizations of advancedness
  • Relationships between learner individual differences (IDs) and L2 development
    • Working memory capacity (WMC) and L2 development
    • WMC and L2 morphosyntax
    • WMC and L2 proficiency
  • Summary of findings and gaps
  • Future research directions and implications for advanced learning settings
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 8 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.15ser
References (81)
References
Altman, H. (1980). Foreign language teaching: Focus on the learner. In H. Altman & C. Vaughan James (Eds.), Foreign language teaching: Meeting individual needs (pp. 1–16). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. (2014). Individual differences in and study abroad: Four profiles of oral proficiency gain. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5, 477–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20, R136–R140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (Ed.) (2006). Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2012). Advanced language proficiency. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 506–521). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colombi, M. C. (2006). Grammatical metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students in Spanish. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 147–163). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and a user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory-based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 615–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94–112). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Individual differences in second language learning (pp. 589–630). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh- gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 443–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C. (2013). The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for second-language reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 727–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 137–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, C. (Ed.) (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions. Modern Language Journal, 100, 255–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havik, E., Roberts, L., van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject–object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59, 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 129–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, K. M. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in non-novice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 30, 225–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2008). Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 58, 703–746. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. J., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory: L2 question development through recasts in a laboratory setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Individual cognitive/affective learner contributions and differential success in second language acquisition. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 12–24). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2007). Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 773–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 51, 55–72.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2017). An exploratory study on the role of foreign language aptitudes in instructed pragmatics learning in L2 Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 6, 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 21, 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A. & Weiss, D. J. (2011). Working memory predicts the acquisition of explicit L2 knowledge. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 101–113). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Logie, R. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–365). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nowbakht, M. (2019). The role of working memory, language proficiency, and learners’ age in second language English learners’ processing and comprehension of anaphoric sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 48, 353–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts oral fluency gains. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–582.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2008). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 133–147). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2013). Working memory in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120, 2022–2039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. (2005). Mind and context in adult second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2014). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in Ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37, 669–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second language. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–408). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 369–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 607–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2008a). Longitudinal gain of higher-order inferential abilities in L2 English: Accuracy, speed, and conventionality. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2017). Introduction to a thematic review: Pragmatics research in Chinese as a second language. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 6, 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trude, A. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Negative transfer from Spanish and English to Portuguese pronunciation: The roles of inhibition and working memory. Language Learning, 61, 259–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11, 289–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. (2005). Individual differences in adult Chinese second language acquisition: The relationships among aptitude, memory and strategies for learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2018). Individual differences in advanced proficiency. In P. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 157–178). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar