Cover not available
Part of
Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology: In honor of Terrell A. Morgan
Edited by Manuel Díaz-Campos and Sandro Sessarego
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 32] 2021
► pp. 29–46

Chapter 2
“Feel really Uruguayan”

Group unity, stance, respect and politeness. Forms of address in advertisements and commercial documents in the Spanish of Montevideo

| The College of Wooster
This chapter considers second-person singular forms of address (tú, vos, usted) in advertisements and business documents in the Spanish of Montevideo, Uruguay. Tú is considered the standard-Spanish familiar address and usted the standard respectful address, while vos is used as an familiar form of address among Uruguayans. Norms of politeness dictate that speakers should accommodate to the hearer using usted. However, familiar vos can indicate politeness for speakers with a similar social status, or to show solidarity. Using examples from marketing and advertising to illustrate usage, we find that over 70% of examples used vos, almost 19% employed usted, and less than 7% used tú. This supports claims that tuteo (whether verbal or pronominal) is disappearing from Montevideo.
Keywords: familiarity, forms of address, group unity, language of business and advertising, politeness, power, pronouns of address, respect, solidarity, stance, tú, usted, vos
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical considerations
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Respect
  • 5.Politeness
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Examples of usted usage
    • 6.2Examples of tú usage
    • 6.3Examples of vos usage
    • 6.4Examples of alternation
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 12 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.32.02ube
References
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A.
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
García, C.
(1992) Refusing an invitation: A case study of Peruvian style. Hispanic Linguistics, 5, 207–243.Google Scholar
Kaul de Marlangeon, S.
(2010) Voseo, ustedeo y cortesía verbal en folletos de propaganda argentinos. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M. E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 993–1011). México, DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. W.
(2016a) Reconceptualizing identity and context in the deployment of forms of address. In M. I. Moyna & S. Rivera-Mills (Eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas (pp. 267–288). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Linguistic reference in the negotiation of identity and action: Revisiting the T/V distinction. Language, 92, 636–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uber, D. R.
(1988) Clitic usage in New York and the Caribbean. Hispania, 71, 385–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘Addressing’ business in Puerto Rico: Tú vs. usted. In A. Roca (Ed.), Research on Spanish in the United States: Linguistic issues and challenges (pp. 310–318). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Creo que entiendo el uso de tú, usted, ustedes, y vosotros. Pero, ¿qué hago con vos? In J. Ewald & A. Edstrom (Eds.), El español a través de la lingüística: Preguntas y respuestas (pp. 50–60). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Formas y fórmulas de trato en situaciones laborales en Santiago de Chile y Buenos Aires. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M. E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 1051–1080). México, DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
(2011) Forms of address: The effect of the context. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 244–262). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) La unidad grupal, el respeto y la cortesía: Fórmulas de tratamiento en los negocios en el español porteño. In A. M. Cestero Mancera, I. Molina Martos, & F. Paredes García (Eds.), La lengua, lugar de encuentro. Actas del XVI Congreso Internacional de la ALFAL (pp. 1783–1792). Alcalá de Henares, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
(2014) Spanish forms of address in advertising and marketing documents in Madrid: Respect and politeness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Hawaii University International Conference on Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from [URL] (16 July, 2020).
(2015) Formas de tratamiento. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica (Vol. 1, pp. 620–629). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018) Respect and politeness in marketing and advertising documents in Mayagüez, Puerto Rico. In M. González-Rivera (Ed.), Current Research in Puerto Rican Linguistics. (pp. 184–198). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weyers, J. R.
(2009) The impending demise of tú in Montevideo, Uruguay. Hispania, 92, 829–839.Google Scholar
(2016) Making the case for increased prestige of the vernacular: Medellín’s voseo . In M. I. Moyna & S. Rivera-Mills (Eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas (pp. 289–304). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar