References
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.
(1998) Parameterizing Agr: Word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakovic, E.
(1998) Optimality and inversion in Spanish. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, & P. Pesetsky, Is the best good enough? (pp. 35–58). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.
(1995) Null subjects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Contreras, H.
(1991) On the position of subjects. Syntax and Semantics, 25, 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowart, W.
(1997) Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Sage.Google Scholar
Diaconescu, R. C., & Goodluck, H.
(2004) The pronoun attraction effect for D(iscourse)-linked phrases: Evidence from speakers of a null subject language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(4), 303–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.
(1978) Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(3), 427–473.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C.
(2002) Processing ‘D-linked’ phrases. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 633–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, G.
(1993) SPEC of IP and SPEC of CP in Spanish wh-questions. In W. Ashby, M. Mithun, G. Perissinotto, & E. Raposo (Eds), Linguistic perspectives on the Romance languages (pp. 199–209). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) On the syntax and processing of wh-questions in Spanish. In Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 101–114). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Experimenting with wh-movement in Spanish. In K. Arregi (Ed.), Romance linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance (pp. 233–248). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) The D-linking effect on extraction from islands and non-islands. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Referentiality and resumption in wh-dependencies. In J. Ostrove, R. Kramer, & J. Sabbagh (Eds), Asking the right questions: Essays in honor of Sandra Chung (pp. 65–80). Retrieved on 19 November 2020 from [URL]
Goodluck, H., Tsiwah, F., & Saah, K.
(2017) Island constraints are not the result of sentence processing. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 2, 15–1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P., Hendrick, R. & Johnson, M.
(2001) Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. Cognition, 27, 1411–1423.Google Scholar
Gupton, T.
(2021) Aligning syntax and prosody in Galician: Against a prosodic isomorphism account. In T. Gupton & E. Gielau (Eds.), East and West of The Pentacrest: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Paula Kempchinsky. John Benjamins. (This volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P.
(2007a) Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.Google Scholar
(2007b) Retrievability and gradience in filler-gap dependencies. In M. Elliott, J. Kirby, O. Sawada, E. Staraki, & S. Yoon, Proceedings of 43rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (Vol. 43, pp. 217–32). Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(2011) Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 376–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Sag, I.
(2010) Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86, 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Vasishth, S.
(2014) Distinctiveness and encoding effects in online sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, R.
(1998) On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective. In P. Culicover & L. McNally (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax (pp. 241–280). Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M.
(1993) Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J.
(2006) Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 447–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F., & Treviño, E.
(1999) Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua, 107.39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
(1987) Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 98–129). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(2001) Relativized minimality effects. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 89–110). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (Eds.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures 3, (pp. 223–251). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiller, A.
(2014) The acceptability of inverted and non-inverted wh-constructions in Spanish. Comprehensive research paper, Department of Linguistics, University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Stiller, A., & Goodall, G.
(2016) D-linking and working memory: New evidence from Spanish. Poster presented at 29th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Florida, April 2016.
Stowe, L.
(1986) Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(3), 227–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A., & Zwarts, F.
(1993) Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 235–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking. In A. Szabolcsi, Ways of scope taking (pp. 217–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E.
(1984) On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.Google Scholar
Villata, S., Rizzi, L., & Franck, J.
(2016) Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua, 179, 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar