Chapter published in:
Syntactic Geolectal Variation: Traditional approaches, current challenges and new tools
Edited by Alba Cerrudo, Ángel J. Gallego and Francesc Roca Urgell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 34] 2021
► pp. 109–146

Chapter 4
A microsyntactic study of Pyrenean negative emphatic polarity particles with the help of data from linguistic atlases

| Fitzwilliam College, University of Cambridge
In this chapter we show the interest of the data gathered in linguistic atlases and traditional dialectology materials in the context of the significant development of formal studies in dialect syntax. We present a case study based on almost unexplored dialects in the Central Pyrenean region with the purpose of showing how dialectal data can contribute to an in-depth knowledge of the grammar of natural languages. We present an already-tested roadmap to develop a micro-syntactic investigation that aims at providing a fine-grained description of synchronic variation in the use of negative minimizers and, at the same time, seeks to determine the formal features of such items, as well as the consequences of different feature specification for the negative concord.
Keywords: emphatic negation, syntactic variation, minimizers, Pyrenean Occitano-Romance dialects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The study of dialect syntax
    • 2.1Why are the studies in dialect syntax interesting?
      • 2.1.1Advantages of the theoretical approach to dialectal data
      • 2.1.2Data gathered from traditional dialectology applied to formal research
    • 2.2Dialect syntax studies in the Romance varieties of the Transpyrenean area
  • 3.Microvariation studies in the Transpyrenean area. The case study of m-negs
    • 3.1General overview of the phenomenon studied
    • 3.2Presence of the studied phenomenon in the sources of traditional dialectology
    • 3.3A new approach to linguistic atlases as sources for formal studies of m-negs
  • 4.The analysis
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Selected sources
Published online: 26 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.34.04nay
References
Anderwald, L., Kortmann, B.
(2002) Typology and dialectology: A programmatic sketch. In J. Berns, & J. Marle (Eds.), Present-day dialectology. Problems and findings (pp. 159–171). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
(2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 351–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, S.
(2009) Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua, 119, 1607–1623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batllori, M.
(2015) The significance of formal features in language change theory and the evolution of minimizers. In P. Larrivée & L. Chungming (Eds.), Negation and negative polarity: Cognitive and experimental perspectives (pp. 347–377). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Batllori, M., & Hernanz, M. L.
(2013) Emphatic polarity particles in Spanish and Catalan. Lingua, 128, 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bec, P.
(1968) Les interférences linguistiques entre Gascon et Languedocien dans les parlers du Comminges et du Couserans. París: PUF.Google Scholar
Benincà, P.
(2004) Dialetti d’Italia e dialetti d’Europa. Quaderns d’Italià, 8/9, 11–26.Google Scholar
Benincà, P., & Poletto, C.
(1991) Il modelo generativo e la dialettologia: Un’indagine sintattica. RID, 15, 77–97.Google Scholar
Breitbarth, A.
(2014) The history of low German negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, A., & Haegeman, L.
(2014) The distribution of preverbal en in (West) Flemish: Syntactic and interpretive properties. Lingua, 147, 69–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, A., Lucas, C., & Willis, D.
(2013) Incipient Jespersen’s cycle: The (non)-grammaticalization of new negative markers. In J. Fleischer & H. Simon (Eds.), Sprachwandelvergleich / Comparing diachronies (pp. 143–164). Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucheli, C., & Glaser, E.
(2002) The Syntactic Atlas of Swiss German Dialects: Empirical and methodological problems. In S. Barbiers & L. Cornips (Eds.), Syntactic microvariation (pp. 41–74). Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P.
(1998) Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(2006) Implicatures of domain widening. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 535–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1976) Mica. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Padova, 1, 101–112.Google Scholar
Cornips, L., & Poletto, C.
(2005) On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua, 115, 939–957. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Field linguistics meets formal research: How a microparametric view can deepen our theoretical investigation (sentential negation). Paper presented at the ICLaVE 4 , Nicosia, Cyprus.
De Clercq, K.
(2017) The nanosyntax of French negation: A diachronic perspective. In S. Cruschina, K. Hartmann, & E. M. Remberger (Eds.), Studies on Negation. Syntax, semantics, and variation (pp. 49–80). Göttingen: V&R unipress, Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T.
(1993) The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 353–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. T., & Tubau, S.
(2016) Meaning of words, meaning of sentences. Building the meaning of n-words. In S. Fischer & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance linguistics (pp. 187–212). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floricic, F.
(2006) Remarques sur la négation connexionnelle en occitan languedocien. Studia Romanica, 33, 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á.
(2010) Phase theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, J.
(2008) A case of incomplete Jespersen’s Cycle in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 33, 117–135.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E.
(2011) The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K.
(1997) Some observations on the contributions of local languages to linguistic science. Lingua, 100, 71–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.
(1989) A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1917) Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: Enjar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
(1996) Microparametric syntax. Some introductory remarks. In J. R. Black & V. Motapanyane (Eds.), Microparametric syntax and dialect variation (pp. ix–xviii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P., & Condoravdi, C.
(2005) Jespersen’s cycle: The argument phase. Paper presented at the 11th Stanford Semfest , Stanford, CA.
Kroch, A.
(2000) Syntactic change. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 699–729). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labelle, M., & Espinal, M. T.
(2014) Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua, 145, 194–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laka, I.
(1994) On the syntax of negation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A.
(2017) Marking presuppositional negation in the dialects of southern Italy. In S. Cruschina, K. Hartmann & E. M. Remberger (Eds.), Studies on negation. Syntax, semantics, and variation (pp. 105–130). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Llop, A.
(2016) The future of Catalan dialects’ syntax. A case study for a methodological contribution. In M. H. Côté, R. Knooihuizen, & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), The future of dialects (pp. 63–72). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
(2017) La reanàlisi dels minimitzadors negatius en el continuum romànic pirinenc (Doctoral dissertation). Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra.Google Scholar
(2020) Perspectives diacròniques en la variació microsintàctica sincrònica. Lleida: Publicacions de la Universitat de Lleida.Google Scholar
Llop, A., & Pineda, A.
(2017) L’estudi de la variació sintàctica en català: On som i cap on anem? In M. Pérez Saldayana & R. Roca Ricart (Eds.), Actes del XVIIè Col·loqui Internacional de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes. Valencia: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Muller, C.
(1991) La négation en français: Syntaxe, sémantique et éléments de comparaison avec les autres langues romanes. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Nagore, F.
(1989) Gramàtica aragonesa. Zaragoza: Mira Editores.Google Scholar
(2001) Los Pirineos: Un nexo de unión entre el occitano y el aragonés. Revista de Filología Románica, 18, 261–296.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J.
(1990) Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. Linguistic Review, 7, 183–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A.; Syder, F. H.
(1983) Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 7 / 5, 551–579.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C.
(2014) (Ed.). Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, C.
(2017) Negative doubling: In favour of a “Big NegP” analysis. In S. Cruschina, K. Hartmann, & E. M. Remberger (Eds.), Studies on negation. Syntax, semantics, and variation (pp. 81–104). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G.
(2002) Two types of negation in Bengali (Unpublished manuscript). Oxford University.Google Scholar
Rigau, G.
(1998) La variació sintàctica: Uniformitat en la diversitat. Caplletra, 25, 63–82.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2007) Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Roussou, A.
(2003) Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca, F., & Suñer, A.
(1998) Reduplicación y tipos de cuantificación en español. Estudi General, Revista de la Facultat de Lletres de la Universitat de Girona, 17, 37–66.Google Scholar
Saura, J. A.
(2000) La cuantificación benasquesa. In F. Nagore (Ed.). Homenaje a Rafael Andolz: Estudios sobre la cultura popular, la tradición y la lengua en Aragón (pp. 593–610). Huesca: IEA (Diputación de Huesca).Google Scholar
Schwenter, S.
(2003)  No and tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 999–1030. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sistac, R.
(1993) El ribagorçà a l’Alta Llitera. Els parlars de la vall de la Sosa de Peralta. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
(1998) El català d’Àneu: Reflexions a l’entorn dels dialectes contemporanis. Esterri d’Àneu: Consell Cultural de les Valls d’Àneu.Google Scholar
Suïls, J.
(2011) Els dialectes dels Pirineus centrals i la qüestió de les relacions interlingüístiques. In A. Sagarna, J. Lakarra & P. Salaberri (Eds.), Actes del congrés Les llengües dels Pirineus: Passat i present (pp. 823–856). Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Suïls, J., Sistac, R., & Rigau, G.
(2010) Generalització i particularització en ribagorçà: alguns trets en relació amb el benasquès i l’occità. In Actes del XIVè Col·loqui Internacional de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes (pp. 325–340). Barcelona: PAM.Google Scholar
Sumien, D.
(2009) Classificacion dei dialèctes occitans. Linguistica Occitana, 7, 1–56. Retrieved on 14 December 2020 from: www​.revistadoc​.org
Tomás, X.
(2016) Elementos de lingüística contrastiva en aragonés. Estudio de algunas afinidades con gascón, catalán y otros romances (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Tubau, S.
(2008) Negative concord in English and Romance: Syntax morphology interface conditions on the expression of negation. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
Tubau, S., Déprez, V., Borràs-Comes, J., & Espinal, M. T.
(2018) How speakers interpret the negative markers no and no … pas in Catalan. Probus, 30, 121–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, E.
(1994) Polarity items, n-words and minimizers in Catalan and Spanish. Probus, 6, 263–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R.
(1997) Negation and clausal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H.
(2004) Sentential negation and negative concord (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(2010) On French negation (Unpublished manuscript). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Selected sources

ALAR: Ensergueix, J.
(2003) Atlas Linguistique de l’Ariège selon l’enquête “Sacaze” de 1887. Pàmias: Institut d’Estudis Occitans d’Arieja.Google Scholar
ALDC: Veny, J., & Pons, L.
(1993–2016) Atles Lingüístic del Domini Català. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
ALF: Edmont, E., & Gilliéron, J.
(1902–1910) Atlas Linguistique de la France. París: Champion. Retrieved in [http://​cartodialect​.imag​.fr​/cartoDialect/]
ALG: Séguy, J.
(1954–1973) Atlas Linguistique et Ethnographique de la Gascogne. París: Centre Nationale de Récherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
BaTelÒc: Basa Textuala per la Lenga d’Òc. Laboratòri de linguistica CLLE-ERSS
Unitat Mixta de Recèrca del CNRS e de l’Universitat de Tolosa Joan Jaurés (Myriam Bras, dir.). Retrieved on 14 December 2020 from: http://​redac​.univ​-tlse2​.fr​/bateloc​/index​.jsp
Carrera, A.
(2007) Gramatica aranesa. Lleida: Pagès editors.Google Scholar
Jensen, F.
(1986) The syntax of medieval Occitan. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lagarda, A.
(2006) Tres palometas blancas. Toulouse: Institut d’Estudis Occitans.Google Scholar