Chapter published in:
Linguistic Landscape in the Spanish-speaking World
Edited by Patricia Gubitosi and Michelle F. Ramos Pellicia
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 35] 2021
► pp. 4572


Alonzo, K. L.
(2016) Use and perception of the pronominal trio vos, tú, usted in a Nicaraguan community in Miami, Florida. In M. Moyna & S. Rivera-Mills (Eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas (pp. 197–232). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, P.
(2008) Rules and regulations in linguistic landscaping: A comparative perspective. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 197–212). Routledge.Google Scholar
Barni, M., & Bagna, C.
(2008) A mapping technique and the linguistic landscape. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 126–139). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartens, A.
(2004) Notas sobre el uso de las formas de tratamiento en el español colombiano. Paper presented at the Pronombres de segunda persona y formas de tratamiento en las lenguas de Europa Conference. Retrieved on 15 January, 2020 from: http://​cvc​.cervantes​.es​/obref​/coloquio​_paris​/ponencias​/pdf​/cvc​_bartens​.pdf
(2006) Notas preliminares sobre el uso de las formas de tratamiento en el español bogotano actual. Dialogic language use (pp. 209–223). Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N.
(2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benavides, C.
(2003) La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica. Hispania, 86(3), 612–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, K., & Michnowicz, J.
(2010) Forms of address in Chilean Spanish. Hispania, 93(3), 413–429.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A.
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carr, J. R. C.
(2017) Signs of our times: Language contact and attitudes in the linguistic landscape of southeast Los Angeles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Retrieved on 15 January, 2021 from: https://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/3k10h7g5
Carrasco Santana, A.
(2002) Los tratamientos en español. Ediciones Colegio de España.Google Scholar
Carricaburo, N.
(1997) Las fórmulas de tratamiento en el español actual. Arco libros.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M.
(2010) ¿Eres de la frontera o sos de la capital? Variation and alternation of second-person verbal forms in Uruguayan border Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 29(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
(2006) Linguistic landscape and minority languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chatfield, C., & Collins, A. J.
(1980) Principal component analysis. In C. Chatfield & A. J. Collins (Eds.), Introduction to multivariate analysis (pp. 57–81). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, M., & Spencer, A.
(2009) The vocative – an outlier case. In A. L. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of case. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de los Heros, S.
(2001) La percepción y valoración lingüística de acentos regionales en el mantenimiento de la variante asibilada en el castellano andino: Primeros resultados. In J. Calvo Pérez (Ed.), Contacto interlingüístico e intercultural en el mundo hispano, 1 (pp. 239–257). Universitat de Valencia, Instituto valenciano de lenguas y culturas andinas.Google Scholar
Díaz Collazos, A. M.
(2015) Desarrollo sociolingüístico del voseo en la región andina de Colombia (1555–1976). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco Rodríguez, J.
(2008) El paisaje lingüístico del Condado de Los Angeles y del Condado Miami-Dade: Propuesta metodológica. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 35(1), 3–43.Google Scholar
Freites Barros, F., & Zambrano Castro, W.
(2007) El voseo andino tachirense: ¿Marca de género? Boletin de Lingüística, 19(28), 26–45.Google Scholar
García, O., Espinet, I., & Hernández, L.
(2013) Las paredes hablan en El Barrio: Mestizo signs and semiosis. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, Vol. 11, 1(21), 135–152.Google Scholar
Gorter, D.
(2013) Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 190–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T.
(2008) A framework for the linguistic analysis of linguistic landscapes. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 78–95). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hult, F. M.
(2008) Language ecology and linguistic landscape analysis. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery, (pp. 96–144). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jang, J. S.
(2010) Pronominal address forms of college students in Medellin (Colombia) from the sociopragmatic point of view: Socioeconomic status and sex. Íkala, 15(3), 43–116.Google Scholar
(2013) Voseo medellinense como expresión de identidad paisa. Íkala, 18(1), 61–81.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., & Danielson, A. E.
(2006) Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jolliffe, I. T.
(2002) Principal component analysis. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1966) Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In W. Bright (Ed.), Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference 1964 (pp. 84–113). Mouton.Google Scholar
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y.
(1997) Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
(1999) The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. Language and Computers, 26, 107–120.Google Scholar
Leeman, J., & Modan, G.
(2009) Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 332–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M.
(2004) El español de América y los contactos bilingües recientes: Apuntes microdialectológicos. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 2(2), 89–103.Google Scholar
Lou, J. J.
(2016) The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michnowicz, J., & Place, S.
(2010) Perceptions of second person singular pronoun use in San Salvador, El Salvador. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(2), 353–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millan, M.
(2014) “Vos sos paisa”: A study of address forms in Medellin, Colombia. In R. Orozco (Ed.), New directions in Hispanic linguistics (pp. 92–111). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Newall, G. M.
(2016) Second person singular forms in Cali Colombian Spanish. In M. Moyna & S. Rivera-Mills (Eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas (pp. 149–170). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, B. H., & Zentz, L. R.
(2016) Theorizing mobility in semiotic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(1), 26–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Páez Urdaneta, I.
(1981) Historia y geografía hispanoamericana del voseo. Casa de Bello.Google Scholar
Penny, R. J.
(2000) Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pharies, D. A.
(2008) A brief history of the Spanish language. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinkerton, A.
(1986) Observations on the tú/vos option in Guatemalan Ladino Spanish. Hispania, 69(3), 690–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Placencia, M. E.
(2010) El estudio de formas de tratamiento en Colombia y Ecuador. In B. K. M. Hummel, M. E. Vázquez Laslop (Ed.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 341–373). El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Qualtrics, I.
(2013) Qualtrics [Version: Summer 2018]. Retrieved from: https://​www​.qualtrics​.com
Reh, M.
(2004) Multilingual writing: A reader-oriented typology – with examples from Lira Municipality (Uganda). International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 170, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo-Ramos, F.
(2020) Public signage in a multilingual Caribbean Enclave: The linguistic landscape of Old Providence and Santa Catalina, Colombia. In D. Pascual y Cabo & I. Elola (Eds.), Current theoretical and applied perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics (pp. 273–294). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2021) If signs could talk: The linguistic landscape of the archipelago of San Andres, Colombia. In L. M. Leung G. & H. Leusman (Eds.), When Creole and Spanish collide: Language and cultural contact in the Caribbean. Brill.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D.
(1988) Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 4, 140–161.Google Scholar
Sebba, M.
(2010) Discourses in transit. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp. 59–76). Continuum.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D.
(Eds.) (2008) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2008) Prolegomena to a sociolinguistic theory of public signage. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds), Linguistic Landscape. Expanding the scenery (pp. 33–47). Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012) The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, T. P., & Troyer, R. A.
(2017) Inclusive ethnographies: Beyond the binaries of observer and observed in linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(3), 306–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A.
(2011) Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Team, R. C.
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Uber, D. R.
(1985) The dual function of usted: Forms of address in Bogotá, Colombia. Hispania, 68(2), 388–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Weyers, J.
(2009) The impending demise of tú in Montevideo, Uruguay. Hispania, 92(4), 829–839.Google Scholar
(2016) Medellin cuenta con vos: The changing role of voseo in written communication/ Medellin cuenta con vos: El papel cambiante de voseo en la comunicacion escrita. comunicación 35, 67–82.Google Scholar
(2018) Beer, hot dogs and politics: The vocative function of Medellín’s voseo. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 95(5), 475–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar