Part of
Sound, Syntax and Contact in the Languages of AsturiasEdited by Guillermo Lorenzo
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 93–108
Edited by Guillermo Lorenzo
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 93–108
Chapter 5¿Qué che femos con el che?
Some properties of the ethical dative ‘che’ in Asturian Galician
This chapter is devoted to the pervasive use in Asturian Galician of a clitic token formally identical to the second person singular dative, albeit with different conditions of use and subject to very different placement restrictions. We claim that such item incorporates a ‘clusivity’ feature as an extension of the second person, compatible with its modal meaning, and that it benefits from the underspecification of the vocabulary item that also materializes the dative. We also claim that it belongs to a class different to ‘determiner-type’ clitics and ‘agreement-type’ clitics, which we deem ‘other-type.’ Despite its specificities, the chapter shows that it is not, however, a peripheric unit, inasmuch as its behavior is fully consistent with UG dictums.
Keywords: pronominal clitics, modal clitics, ethical dative, clitic clusters
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The syntax of clitic pronouns
- 3.Syntactic characterization of ED che in Asturian Galician
- 3.1Compatibility with other kinds of datives
- 3.2Incompatibility with phrasal associates
- 3.3Invisibility to the Person-Case Constraint (PCC)
- 4.Towards an explanation and some of its consequences
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements -
Abbreviations -
References
References (33)
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Walter de Gruyter.
Béjar, S. & Rezac, M. (2009). Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 35–73. 
Bonet, M. E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Branchadell, A. (1992). A study of lexical and non-lexical datives. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belleti. (ed.). Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures 3 (pp. 104–131). Oxford University Press.
Cysouw, M. (2013). Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath. (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Embick, D. & Noyer, R. (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 289–324). Oxford University Press.
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2016). Differential object marking in Basque dialects. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina. (eds.). Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (pp. 93–138). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Filimonova, E. (ed.). (2005). Clusivity: Typological and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser. (eds.). The view from Building 20 (pp. 111–176). MIT Press.
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Foris.
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C. & Gerard, Ch. -L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113–160.
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. MIT Press.
(1989). Null subjects and clitic climbing. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir. (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 239–261). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.
Leclère, Ch. (1976). Datifs syntaxiques et datifs éthiques. In J. -C. Chevalier & M. Gross. (eds.). Méthodes en grammaire française (pp. 73–96). Klincksieck.
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2001). Universal constraints on ‘superfluous’ elements: The case of Galician ‘Arb Che’. In J. Gutiérrez-Resach & J. Silva-Villar. (eds.). Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics 53 (pp. 175–192). Mouton de Gruyter.
Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G. & Rigau, G. (1996). Expressing modality by recycling clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 69–79.
Lorenzo, G. (this issue). Are Asturian clitics distinctly distinct?
Martins, A. M. & Nunes, J. (2017). Identity avoidance with reflexive clitics in European Portuguese and Minimalist approaches to control. Linguistic Inquiry, 48, 627–649.
McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 217–263.
Odria, A. (2017). Differential object marking and datives in Basque syntax. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of the Basque Country.
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2007). The Object Agreement Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 315–347.
(2013). Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus, 25, 301–344.
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2015). Argumentos añadidos y restricciones de concordancia. In A. Gallego. (ed.). Perspectivas de sintaxis formal (pp. 223–252). Akal.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering trees. MIT Press.
Simon, H. J. (2005). Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second-person plural. In E. Filimonova, Elena. (ed.). Clusivity: Typological and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction (pp. 113–140). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring. (eds.). Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Kluwer.
Strotzer, J. (1978). On the so-called ‘dative of interest’. Hispania, 61, 117–123.
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of the objects. MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–123.
Zwicky, A. M. (1977). On clitics. Indiana University Linguistics Club.