Chapter 8
Promoting Spanish L2 pragmatic competence in a virtual
environment
The relationship between processes
and instructional
methods
Virtual Environments (VE) can mimic the myriad
dimensions that native speakers take into account in authentic
social interactions and are one of the instructional conditions
(e.g., methodological approaches, learning affordances) that can be
used to promote pragmatic competence. The present study employs
big-data techniques to provide a parsimonious and quantifiable model
of affordance usage in VEs fostering L2 Spanish learners’ pragmatic
abilities. We employ data-reduction analyses to synthesize tracking
data that recorded learners’ use of software features within
consciousness-raising and structured-input, both involving
task-based language teaching (TBLT). The analysis suggests that
three macro variables can significantly classify different learning
conditions: (i) movement through the VE, (ii) type of interaction
with affordances providing input, (iii) time on task.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Developing pragmatic competence
- 1.2Understanding the design principles that promote pragmatic
competence
- 1.3Affordances and call
- 2.Research question
- 3.Method and materials
- 3.1Consciousness-raising Group (CR)
- 3.2Structured Input Group (SI)
- 4.Procedure
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Principal components analysis
- 5.2Discriminant analysis
- 5.3Predicting pragmatic gains
- 6.Results
- 6.1Positing a VE affordance usage model
- 6.1.1Macro variable: Exploration
- 6.1.2Macro variable: Input
- 6.1.3Macro variable: Time in area
- 6.1.4Model summary
- 6.2Assessing the VE affordance usage model’s explanatory
potential
- 6.3Testing the VE affordance usage model’s potential for
predicting pragmatic gains in a VE
- 7.Discussion and conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
References
Alcón Soler, E. (2005). Does
instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL
context? System, 33(3), 417–435.
Bates, D. (2005). Fitting
linear models in R: Using the lme4
package. R
News, 5, 27–30.
Chun, D. M. (2016). The
role of technology in SLA
research. Language Learning
&
Technology, 20(2), 98–115.
Clennell, C. (1999). Promoting
pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP
classes. ELT
Journal, 53(2), 82–91.
Collentine, K. (2011). Learner
autonomy in a task-based 3D world and
production. Language Learning
&
Technology, 15, 50–67.
Collentine, K. (2013). Using
tracking technologies to study the effects of linguistic
complexity in CALL input and SCMC
output. In P. Hubbard, M. Schulze, and B. Smith (Eds.), Learner-computer
interaction in language education: A Festschrift in honor of
Robert
Fischer. (pp. 46–65). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
Collentine, K. (2020). The
acquisition of pragmatically-appropriate requests by second
language learners of Spanish using an input-based virtual
environment. In Freiermuth, M. & Zarrinabadi, N. (Eds.), Technology
and the Psychology of Second Language Learners and
Users (pp. 35–62). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Mello, G. (1995). Preposición
+ sujeto + infinitivo: ‘Para yo
hacerlo’. Hispania, 78, 825–836.
De Pablos-Ortega, C. (2016). Pragmática
en la formación de profesores de español como segunda
lengua. Journal of Spanish
Language
Teaching, 3(2), 171–188.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2007). Pragmatic
development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A
cross-sectional study of learner
requests. Intercultural
Pragmatics, 4, 253–286.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Pedagogical
intervention and the development of pragmatic competence
learning Spanish as a foreign
language. Issues in Applied
Linguistics, 16, 49–84.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2017). Interlanguage
pragmatics. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The
Oxford Handbook of
Pragmatics (pp. 416–434). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., & Koike, D. (2014). Perspectives
on Spanish SLA from pragmatics and
discourse. In M. Lacorte (Ed.) The
Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied
linguistics (pp. 25–43). New York: Routledge.
Fischer, R. (2007). How
do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring
students’ behavior in
CALL. Computer Assisted
Language
Learning, 20(5), 409–442.
Gironzetti, E., & Koike, D. (Eds.). (2016). Bridging
the gap in Spanish instructional pragmatics: From theory to
practice [Special
issue]. Journal of Spanish
Language
Teaching, 3(2), 89–98.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Big
data and language learning: Opportunities and
challenges. Language Learning
&
Technology, 25(1), 4–19.
Hwu, F. (2013). A
review of the use of script-based tracking in CALL research
for data sharing: Applications providing meaning
aids. Computer Assisted
Language
Learning, 26(4), 350–370.
Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. (2010). Teaching
and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture
meet. Harlow, Essex, England: Pearson Longman.
Koike, D. & Pearson, L. (2005). The
effect on instruction and feedback in the development of
pragmatic
competence. System, 33(3), 481–501.
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2018). Pragmática. In J. Muñoz-Basols, E. Gironzetti, & M. Lacorte (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of Spanish language teaching.
Metodologías, contextos y recursos para la enseñanza del
español (pp. 348–361). New York: Routledge.
Langer, B. D. (2013). Teaching
requests to L2 learners of
Spanish. Journal of Language
Teaching and
Research, 4, 1147–1159.
Martínez-Flor, A. & Fukuya, Y. (2005). The
effects of instruction on learners’ production of
appropriate and accurate
suggestions. System, 33(3), 463–480.
McKinnon, S. (2017). TBLT
instructional effects on tonal alignment and pitch range in
L2 Spanish imperatives versus
declaratives. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 39(2), 287–317.
Meier, A. (1997). Teaching
the universals of
politeness. ELT
Journal, 51(1), 21–28.
Mir, M. (2018). Learning
L2 Spanish pragmatics: What research says, what textbooks
offer, what teachers must
do. In D. Dumitrescu & P. L. Andueza (Eds.), L2
Spanish pragmatics: From research to
teaching. (pp. 33–52). New York: Routledge.
Mwinyelle, J. (2005). The
acquisition of pragmatic competence in an L2 classroom:
giving advice in
Spanish. Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Pearson, L. (2018). L2
Spanish pragmatics at the novice level: Creating meaningful
contexts for the acquisition of grammatical
forms. In D. Dumitrescu & P. L. Andueza (Eds.), L2
Spanish pragmatics, from research to
teaching (pp. 214–231). New York: Routledge.
Pearson, L. & Hasler-Barker, M. (2021). Second
language acquisition of Spanish
pragmatics. In D. Koike & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of Spanish pragmatics: Foundations and
interfaces. (pp. 522–537). New York: Routledge.
R development core
team. (2022). R:
A language and environment for statistical
computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reinders, H. & White, C. J. (2016). 20
years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and
where to next? Language
Learning &
Technology, 20(2), 143–154.
Roever, C. (2009). Teaching
and testing
pragmatics. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The
handbook of language
teaching. (pp. 560–577). West Sussex: UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rose, K. (2005). On
the effects of instruction in second language
pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness,
learning, and interlanguage
pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage
Pragmatics. (pp. 21–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sesarrego, C. (2021). Advances
in L2 Spanish pragmatics classroom
instruction. In D. Koike & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of Spanish pragmatics: Foundations and
interfaces. (pp. 522–537). New York: Routledge.
Shively, R. (2011). L2
pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study
of Spanish service
encounters. Journal of
Pragmatics, 43, 1818–1835.
Shively, R. (2014). Language
in context: pragmatics in second language
Spanish. In K. Geeslin (Ed.) The
handbook of Spanish second language
acquisition. (pp. 331–350). West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Shively, R. & Cohen, A. (2008). Development of Spanish requests and apologies during study abroad. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 13(20), 57–118.
Sykes, J. (2009). Learner
requests in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser
virtual environments for L2 pragmatic
acquisition. In L. Lomika & G. Lord (Eds.), The
Next Generation: Social Networking and Online Collaboration
in Foreign Language
Learning. (pp. 199–234). San Marcos: CALICO Monograph Series.
Sykes, J. (2015). Emerging
technological contexts for teaching
Spanish. In M. Lacorte (Ed.) The
Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied
linguistics. (pp. 238–257). New York: Routledge.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using
multivariate
statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Contextually
speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class,
and
Online. System, 48, 3–20.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second
language
pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Compernolle, R. A., Gómez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A. (2016). Teaching
L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A
classroom-based study. The
Modern Language
Journal, 100(1), 341–361.
van Lier, L. (2000). From
input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an
ecological
perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.) Sociocultural
theory and second language
learning. (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vinther, T. & Jensen, E. (2008). El
aprendizaje de la cortesía verbal a través de ínput
audiovisual o
escrito. In A. Briz, A. Hidalgo, M. Abelda, J. Contreras, & N. Hernández Flores (Eds.), Cortesía
y converación: De lo escrito a lo
oral. (pp. 798–809). Valencia: Progama EDICE.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gradoville, Michael & Sean McKinnon
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.