Article published in:Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 1–24
No superiority, no intervention effects
The Spanish puzzle
Recent typological approaches (Cable, 2010; Pesetsky, 2000) explain the independently-noticed crosslinguistic differences between Superiority and Intervention Effects as the result of general lexical differences of wh-phrases. A pattern that seems to be recurrent crosslinguistically is that languages that display Superiority do not exhibit Intervention Effects and vice versa. In other words, Superiority and Intervention Effects appear to be in complementary distribution in natural languages. Surprisingly, Spanish lacks both Superiority and Intervention Effects. This paper accounts for this unexpected behavior in Spanish as the result of a lexical property of Spanish that allows some of its wh-phrases to enter the derivation as two dependent elements: a Q-particle and a dependent wh-variable.
Keywords: (un)selective binding, Intervention Effects, Q-particle, Superiority Effects, wh-phrases
Published online: 30 July 2015
Adger, D., & Smith, J.
(2007) Phase theory and parametric variation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
(2011) Movement and Intervention Effects: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Maryland.
Reglero, L., & Ticio, M.E.
in progress). D-linking in Spanish: A movement analysis. Ms. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, and Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
(2008) Intervention and rescue: Arguments for representational constraints on syntactic dependencies. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
(1987) On empty categories in nominals. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Boston.