Article published in:
Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis
Edited by Sandro Sessarego and Fernando Tejedo-Herrero
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8] 2016
► pp. 323–342

A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of contact-induced changes in subject placement in the Spanish of New York City bilinguals

| DePaul University
| The CUNY Graduate Center
This chapter reports on a variationist sociolinguistic analysis of variable subject placement in the Spanish of first- and second-generation Spanish-English bilinguals in New York City. We show that second-generation speakers exhibit a more rigid word order compared to their first-generation peers, and we attribute this difference to their increased use of and contact with English. However, we also find that regional differences in subject placement in the first generation are maintained, to a certain degree, in the second generation, indicating that both English contact and continuity with Latin American ways of speaking shape Spanish in New York City.
Keywords: contact-induced change, subject placement, Threshold Hypothesis
Published online: 25 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.8.14bar
References

References

Barrera-Tobón, C.
(2013) Contact-Induced changes in word order and intonation in the Spanish of New York City bilinguals (Unpublished PhD dissertation). The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York: ProQuest/UMI.Google Scholar
Bergad, L.
(2011) The Latino population of New York City, 1990 - 2010. The CUNY Center for Latin American, Caribbean, and Latino Studies’ Latino Data Project Report, 44.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, P., & Sedano, M.
(2000) El sujeto liviano: Una restricción de tipo funcional. Boletín de Filología (Universidad de Chile), 38, 9-22.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, P.
(2003) Orden de palabras en español: Un análisis sintáctico-semántico-pragmático del sujeto. Lexis, 1-2, 235-260.Google Scholar
Field, A.
(2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1993) English grammar: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.A.
(1983) Word order universals. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, J.
(1994) Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Newton, R.R., & Rudestam, K.E.
(1999) Your statistical consultant: Answers to your data analysis questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125-142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morales, A.
(1988) Hacia un universal sintáctico del español del Caribe: El orden SVO. Anuario de lingüística hispánica, 5,139-152.Google Scholar
Nava, E.H.
(2007) Word order in bilingual Spanish: Convergence and intonation strategy. In J. Holmquist, A. Lorenzino, & L. Sayahi (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the Third Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 129-139). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ocampo, F.
(1995) The word order of constructions with a verb, a subject, and a direct object in spoken Spanish. In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti & M. Phinney (Eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics (pp. 291-306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The word order of constructions with ser and estar, a subject NP, and an adjective in spoken Spanish. In J. Lee, K. Geeslin, & C. Clemens (Eds.) Structure, meaning, and acquisition in Spanish: Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 212-219). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A.C.
(2012) Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialect leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raña Risso, R.
(2010) Subject pronoun placement as evidence of contact and leveling in Spanish in New York. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 203, 101-114.Google Scholar
(2013) A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of subject pronoun placement in Spanish in New York. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York: ProQuest/UMI.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G.
(2002) Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 638-669). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) The study of language contact: An overview of the issues. In C. Silva-Corvalán (Ed.), Spanish in four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Lenguas en contacto y bilingüismo – el español en los EE.UU. In Sociolingüística y pragmática del español (pp. 269-329). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, M.
(2005) Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T.
(1988) Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Toribio, A.J.
(2004) Convergence as an optimization strategy in bilingual speech: Evidence from code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 165-173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau
(2014, July 8). State & county Quickfacts: New York, N.Y. Retrieved from: http://​quickfacts​.census​.gov (29 October 2014).Google Scholar
Zagona, K.
(2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zapata, G.C., Sánchez, L., & Toribio, J.A.
(2005) Contact and contracting Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 377-395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar