A new passive form in Mandarin
Its syntax and implications
Na Liu | Tianjin Normal University
This paper discusses the syntax, semantics and historical source of the new bèi XX construction in Mandarin from a cross-linguistic perspective. We argue that bèi XX is not a special construction that involves the passivization of intransitive verbs. What is passivized in it is not XX itself but a null light verb with the elementary semantics of a causative, putative or activity predicate that takes XX as its complement or adjunct. Such null light verb constructions are abundant in Old Chinese and English, though often not in passive form. Different from them, the bèi XX construction does not have a grammatical active form. We attribute this difference to the difference between synthetic and analytic languages, and account for it by a parameter in derivational timing. The appearance of the bèi XX construction marks Modern Chinese as being at the early stage of a new cycle of change. The analysis of the bèi XX construction as proposed capitalizes on the role of light verb syntax as being the real essence of grammar, and lends important support to the non-projectionist theories of syntax-lexicon mapping such as Distributed Morphology.
References (50)
Baker, M
(
2011)
On the syntax of surface adjacency: The case of pseudo noun incorporation. Paper presented at
Workshop on Syntax-semantics Interfaces
. Academia Sinica, Taipei.
Borer, H
(
2005)
In name only.
Structuring sense, Volume I1. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chappell, H., & Peyraube, A
(
2011)
Grammaticalization in Sinitic languages. In
H. Narrog &
B. Heine (Eds.),
The oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 786–796). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L.L.-S., & Sybesma, R
(
2005)
Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In
G. Cinque &
R. Kayne (Eds.),
The oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 259–292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
1995)
The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
1999)
Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
R. Martin,
D. Michaels &
J. Uriagereka (Eds.),
Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D
(
1991)
Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.
Language, 671, 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, D
(
2007)
Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 251, 1–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, J
(
1978)
The verbal complex V’-V in French.
Linguistic Inquiry, 9(2), 151–175.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, S.-L
(
1997)
The passive construction in Chinese.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 11, 1–28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, S.-L
(
2005)
轻动词的移位与古今汉语的动宾关系” (Light verb movement in Modern and Classical Chinese).
语言科学 (Linguistic Sciences), 4(1), 3–16.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, S.-L
(
2013)
汉语韵律句法学 (Chinese prosodic syntax, revised and expanded edition). Beijing: Commercial Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, S.-L
(
2014).
Light verb syntax between English and Classical Chinese. Paper presented at the
8th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics
(TEAL-8), National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu. To appear in H.-Y. A. Li, A. Simpson & W.-T. D. Tsai (Eds.),
Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 000–000). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gelderen, E.V
(
2011)
The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T
(
1971)
Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip.
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 71, 394–415.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, K., & Keyser, S.J
(
1993)
On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In
K. Hale &
S.J. Keyser (Eds.),
The view from building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, M., & Marantz, A
(
1993)
Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In
S.J. Keyser &
K. Hale (Eds.),
The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, H
(
2005)
How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In
N. Erteschik-Shir &
T. Rapoport (Eds.),
The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation (pp. 42–64). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P.J., & Thompson, S.A
(
1980)
Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language, 561, 251–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, C.-R
(
2005)
从隐含到呈现 (上)——试论中古词汇的一个本质变化” (From implicit to explicit I-a study on an essential change of Middle Chinese Morphology).
语言学论丛 (Studies in Linguistics), 311, 1–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, C.-R
(
2008)
从隐含到呈现 (下)——词汇变化影响语法变化 (From implicit to explicit II-morphological changes causing changes in syntax).
语言学论丛 (Studies in Linguistics), 381, 99–127.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J
(
1982).
Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J
(
1999)
Chinese passives in comparative perspective.
Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 291, 423–509.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J
(
2007)
Hànyǔ dòngcí de tíyuán jiégòu yǔ qí jùfǎ biǎoxiàn (Thematic structures of verbs in Chinese and their syntactic projections).
Yuyan Kexue (Linguistic Sciences), 6(4), 3–21.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J
(
2011)
On bèi xiǎo-kāng 被小康 and the putative birth of a new syntactic construction. Paper presented at the
19th Conference of International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-19), Tianjin.
Huang, C.-T.J
(
2014)
Syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In
Y.-H. A. Li,
A. Simpson &
W.-T. D. Tsai (Eds.),
Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 000–000). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J., Li, Y.-H.A., & Li, Y.-F
(
2009)
The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huangxin, J.-R
(
2013)
Xīnxíng bèi X de jùfǎ fēnxī” (The syntactic analysis of the new Bei
X construction). Paper presented at the
21th Conference of International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-21), Taiwan National Normal University.
Kayne, R.S
(
2013)
Comparative syntax.
Lingua, 1301, 132–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, H
(
1995)
Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In
H. Campos &
P. Kempchinsky (Eds.),
Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero (pp. 251–275). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, N
(
2012)
On the syntax, semantics and typology of non-canonical passives. Doctoral dissertation, Beijing Language and Culture University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massam, D
(
2001)
Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 191, 153–197.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, K
(
2003)
Yíngjiē yīge kǎozhèngxué hé yǔyánxué jiéhé de hànyǔyǔfǎshǐ yánjiū de xīn júmiàn” (Anticipating a new horizon of the historical syntax of Chinese incorporating philology and linguistics). In
D.-A. Ho (Ed.),
Gǔjīn tōngsāi: Hànyǔ de lìshǐ yǔ fāzhǎn (Historical development of Chinese language) (pp. 23–47). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, T.-L
(
1989)
The causative and denominative functions of the *s- prefix in Old Chinese.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sinology
(pp. 33–51). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, T.-L
(
2012)
The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan.
Language and Linguistics, 131, 1–28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peyraube, A
(
2007)
Analogy, reanalysis, exaptation and degrammaticalization in Chinese syntactic change. Invited speech at the
5th International Conference of the European Association of Chinese Linguistics (EACL-5), Leipzig.
Pollock, J.-Y
(
1989)
Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry, 201, 365–424.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A
(
2010)
Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In
T. Biberauer et al. (Eds.),
Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shen, Y., & Sybesma, R
(
2010)
Jùfǎ jiégòu biāojì “gěi” yǔ dòngcí jiégòu de yǎnshēng guānxī” (The derivational relation between the syntactic marker gěi and several verbal constructions).
Zhongguo Yuwen (Studies of the Chinese Language), 3361, 222–237.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, A
(
2005)
Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In
G. Cinque &
R. Kayne (Eds.),
The oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 806–838). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, S.-W
(
2006)
Hànyǔ fāngyán shòushì huàtíjù lèixíng de cānshù fēnxī” (A parametric approach to the typology of subtopics in Chinese Dialects).
Yuyan Kexue (Linguistic Sciences), 51, 3–11.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, S.-W
(
2008)
Hànyǔ bèidòngjù jùfǎ fēnxī de chóngxīn sīkǎo” (Syntactic Analysis of Chinese Passives).
Dangdai Yuyanxue (Contemporary Linguistics), (4), 308–319.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S.A
(
1973)
Transitivity and some problems with the ba construction in Mandarin Chinese.
Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 11, 208–221.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ting, J
(
1998)
Deriving the bei-construction in Mandarin Chinese.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 71, 319–354.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wanner, A
(
2009)
Deconstructing the English passive. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wei, P.-C
(
2003)
Shànggǔ Hànyǔ dào zhōnggǔ Hànyǔ yǔfǎ de zhòngyào fāzhǎn” (Important developments from Archaic to Middle Chinese grammar). In
D.-A. Ho (Ed.),
Gǔjīn tōngsāi: Hànyǔ de lìshǐ yǔ fāzhǎn (Historical development of Chinese language) (pp. 75–106). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, D
(
2006)
Typological change in Chinese syntax. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Y.-H
(
2011)
Bèi XX de jùfǎhuà jí qí cíhuìhuà” (The syntactic and morphological changes of the bèi XX construction). Paper presented at the
19th Conference of International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-19), Nankai Univeristy, Tianjin.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Dempsey, Jack, Kiel Christianson & Julie A. Van Dyke
2024.
Linguistically-driven text formatting improves reading comprehension for ELLs and EL1s.
Reading and Writing ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.