Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 5:1 (2018) ► pp.33–58

Bare numeral phrases in Mandarin and the Minimalist Mapping Hypothesis

 | Academia Sinica
We pursue an agreement-based analysis of the bare numeral phrases in Chinese. Bare numeral phrases in Chinese often occur with the you marker in the preverbal position. With the marker, a bare numeral phrase obtains an individual-denoting reading, which has an existential meaning. In contrast, several syntactic environments do not need the you marker, and the bare numeral phrase obtains the quantity-denoting reading. In addition to the existential you marker, we observe that the distributions of the two readings are correlated to the lower (root) modals (Mod) and the middle aspects (Asp). We argue that the correlation can be analyzed through syntactic feature agreement. That is, the bare numeral phrase carries an unvalued quantificational feature in the null D, and its unvalued feature is valued by the corresponding existential you marker, Asp, and/or Mod heads through (multiple) agreement. We argue that the proposed feature agreement mechanism can improve upon the (Extended) Mapping Hypothesis (Diesing 1992; Tsai 1999, 2001) under the Minimalist Program.
Keywords: Chinese (Mandarin), agreement, bare numeral NP, minimalism, syntax-semantics interface, mapping hypothesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two previous approaches
    • 2.1DP and NumP: Li (1998)
    • 2.2Extended mapping hypothesis: Tsai (1999, 2001)
  • 3.On the sources of the LF operators
  • 4.Syntax of bare numerals in Chinese
    • 4.1Deriving the q-denoting reading from multiple-agreement
    • 4.2Deriving the i-denoting reading
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.17002.wen
References (56)
References
Abusch, D. (1994). The scope of indefinites Natural Language Semantics , 21, 83–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L. M. V., and Stavrou, M. (2007). Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., and Travis, L. (1997). Mood as verbal definiteness in a "tenseless" language. Natural Language Semantics, 51, 149–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, R. (1999). Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts. (PhD Dissertation), University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C., and Stjepanovic, S. (2001). Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), 345–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. (2008). Patterns in the Semantics of Generic Sentences. In J. Gueron and J. Lecarme (Eds.), Time and Modality (pp. 17–38). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. -L. S. (1991). On the Typology of Wh-questions. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1995). On DOU-Quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 41, 197–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michael, and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frampton, J., and Gutmann, S. (2002). Crash-proof syntax. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp. 90–105). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1979). Complement Selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(3), 279–326.Google Scholar
(2000). Locality and Extended Projection. In P. Coopmans, M. Everaert, and J. Grimshaw (Eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion (pp. 115–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, V. (2006). Aspects of Modality. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2009). On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(3), 279–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. (PhD Dissertation), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, K. (2005). Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (1969). A Presuppositional Approach to Only and Even . chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 51, 98–107.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1988). Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 641, 274–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Shuo shi he you [On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese]. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 591: 43–64.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L., and Peters, S. (1979). Conventional Implicature. In C. -K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol 11: Presupposition (Vol. 111, pp. 1–56). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1994). Time in Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, W., Li, P., and Hendriks, H. (2000). Aspect and Assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18(4), 723–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts (pp. 38–74). New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989). An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 121, 607–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., and Link, G. (1995). Genericity. In G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp. 1–124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y. -H. A. (1998). Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(4), 693–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Born empty. Lingua, 1511, 43–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. -W. (1998). Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics, 61, 201–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Temporal Reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 121, 259–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. -H. J. (2004). Aspect, Distributivity, and Wh/QP Interaction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 615–642.Google Scholar
Matthewson, L. (1999). On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics, 71, 79–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D., and Torrego, E. (2007). The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, and W. K. Wilkins (Eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piñόn, C. (2003). Being able to. WCCFL, 221, 384–397.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. -Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1997). Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 201, 335–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus. (PhD Dissertation), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1991). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, W. -T. D. (1999). On Economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
(2001). On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 101, 129–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Tan you ren, you de ren, han you xie ren [On "you ren", "you de ren" and "you xie ren"]. Han Yu Xue Bao [Chinese Linguistics], 2004(2), 16–25.Google Scholar
Tsai, C. -Y. E. (2016). On "quantity" number phrases in Mandarin. Talk given in Academia Sinica, Taiwan. Nov. 28th, 2016.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1994). Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2006). The Subject-Predicate Theory of There. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 648–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Y. (1997). Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 201, 399–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, M. (2008). Plurality, Maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou . Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 171, 227–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. (PhD Dissertation), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(2012). There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review, 29(3), 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Yuyun Iris & Wei‐wen Roger Liao
2021. Against the Low Periphery as Phrase Markers: Two Types of Contrastive Dislocations in Mandarin Chinese*. Studia Linguistica 75:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yicheng & Xuping Li
2021. On indefinite subjects in Mandarin. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.