限定性和汉语主句
本文通过对含有光杆动宾结构和体标记的汉语非自足句的考察,提出这些句子不合法的原因在于它们都是非限定句。在对非限定句做出的功能定义的基础上,本文指出事件句的时间理解需要三类抽象“时间”,即事件时间(Situation Time, SitT),声称/指称时间(Topic/Reference Time, TT),和说话时间(Utterance Time, UT)。在此基础上,我们进一步指出限定句的骨架的必有成分包括 CP, TP, AspP 和 VP(即 VP-e)。因此,本文讨论的句子之所以不合法,可以归因于骨架的不完整。同时,本文也检验了几种修补该类句子的手段,指出其目的多是加强了谓语的潜在的事件性,以满足限定事件句骨架的需要。由此,本文提出了一种分析汉语非自足句的新的理论框架。
Keywords: 限定句, 自足句, 完句成分, 时, 体
Article outline
- 1.引言
- 2.限定性
- 3.自足句的骨架:第一步
- 4.骨架:初步总结
- 5.自足句的骨架:第二步
- 5.1UT, TT, SitT
- 5.2AspP, TP
- 6.自足句的骨架:结论
- 7.回到非自足句和它非限定的假设
- 8.句末词的位置
- 9.总结和结论
- 致谢
- 笔记
-
參考文獻
Article language: Chinese
References (38)
參考文獻
Anderson, John M.
(
1997)
Finiteness and auxiliarihood.
From runes to romance: A festschrift for Gunnar Perssón on his sixtieth birthday, ed.
Mats Rydén,
Henryk Kardela,
Johan Nordlander and
Bengt Odenstedt, Umeå: University of Umeå, 1–20.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cáo, Dàogēn 曹道根
(
2018) Zài lùn Hànyǔ shìfǒu yǒu xiàndìng hé fēixiàndìng qūfēn
再论汉语是否有限定和非限定区分 [Revisiting the finite vs. non-finite distinction in Chinese].
Dāngdài Yǔyánxué 当代语言学 20/11, 19–39.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chu, Chauncey C.
(
2009)
Relevance and the discourse functions of Mandarin Utterance Final Particles.
Language and Linguistics Compass 3/11, 282–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David
(
1979)
Word meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gù, Yáng 顾阳
(
2008) Shí tài, shízhì lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ shíjiān cānzhào yánjiū
时态、时制理论与汉语时间参照研究 [Tense, tense theory and time reference in Chinese]. In
Shěn Yáng 沈阳,
Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.)
Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū 当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [
Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 97–119. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guéron, Jacqueline and Teun Hoekstra
(
1995)
The temporal interpretation of predication.
Small clauses [
Syntax and semantics 28], ed.
Anna Cardinaletti and
Maria-Teresa Guasti, 77–107. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hé, Yáng 贺阳
(
1994) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn chūtàn
汉语完句成分初探 [Exploring sentence-completing elements in Chinese].
Yǔyán Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū 语言教学与研究 41, 26–38.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Teun, Nina Hyams and Misha Becker
(
1999)
The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar.
Specifiers. Minimalist approaches, ed.
David Adger,
Susan Pintzuk,
Barbara Plunkett and
George Tsoulas, 252–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan and Liejiong Xu
(
2001)
Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 391:1117–1148.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hú, Jiànhuá 胡建华 and Shí Dìngxǔ 石定栩
(
2005) Wánjù tiáojiàn yǔ zhǐchēng tèzhēng de yǔnzhǔn
完句条件与指称特征的允准 [Conditions on sentence completion and the licensing of referential features].
Yǔyán Kēxué 语言科学 4/51, 42–49.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James
(
1982)
Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Nick
(
2018)
Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27/41, 347–376.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jīn, Tíngēn 金廷恩
(
1999) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn shuōlüè
汉语完句成分说略 [Brief discussion of sentence completing elements in Chinese].
Hànyǔ Xuéxí 汉语学习 61, 8–13.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jìng, Chéng 竟成
(
1996) Hànyǔ de chéngjù guòchéng hé shíjiān gàiniàn de biǎodá
汉语的成句过程和时间概念的表达 [The process of building sentences in Chinese and the expression of the concept of time].
Yǔwén Yánjiū 语文研究 11, 1–5.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Graham
(
1995)
Stativity, genericity and temporal reference, Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Graham
(
2003)
Event arguments, adverb selection and the Stative Adverb Gap.
Modifying Adjuncts ed.
Ewald Lang,
Claudia Maienborn and
Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 455–474.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang
(
1994)
Time in language. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kǒng, Lìngdá 孔令达
(
1994) Yǐngxiǎng Hànyǔ jùzi zìzú de yǔyán xíngshì
影响汉语句子自足的语言形式 [Language forms influencing the self-sufficiency of Chinese sentences].
Zhōngguó Yǔwén 中国语文 61, 434–440.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
(
1998)
More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses.
Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, ed.
Devron Strolovitch and
Aaron Lawson, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications/Cornell University, 92–109.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson
(
1981)
Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Y.-H. Audrey
(
1990)
Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Jo-wang
(
2003)
Selectional restrictions of tenses and temporal reference of Chinese bare sentences.
Lingua 113/31, 271–302.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
(
2011)
Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese.
Syntax, 141, 48–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
(
2012)
Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties.
Journal of Linguistics 481, 151–186.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, Lisa
(
2002)
An underspecified Tense in St’át’imcets. Paper presented at WECOL 2002.
Nikolaeva, Irina
(
2013)
Unpacking finiteness.
Canonical morphology and syntax, ed.
Dunstan Brown,
Marina Chumakina and
Greville Corbett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–122.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikolaeva, Irina
ed. (
2007)
Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichenbach, Hans
(
1947)
Elements of symbolic logic, Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi
(
1997)
The fine structure of the left periphery,
Elements of Grammar, ed.
Liliane Haegeman, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281–337.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sīmǎ, Líng 司马翎 [Rint Sybesma] and Hsieh Feng-fan 谢峰凡
(
2008) Shēngchéng yǔfǎ lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ yǔqìcí yánjiū
生成语法理论与汉语语气词研究 [Generative grammatical theory and the research into Chinese modal particles]. In
Shěn Yáng 沈阳,
Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.)
Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū 当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [
Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 364–374. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Hongyuan
(
2014)
Temporal Construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Universities of Leiden and Nantes. [
[URL]].
Sybesma, Rint
(
2007)
Whether we Tense-agree overtly or not.
Linguistic Inquiry, 381, 580–587.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sybesma, Rint
(
2017)
Finiteness.
Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, ed.
Rint Sybesma,
Wolfgang Behr,
Yueguo Gu,
Zev Handel,
C.-T. James Huang &
James Myers, Leiden: Brill, Vol II1, 233–237.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sybesma, Rint and Li Boya
(
2007)
The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles.
Lingua 117/101, 1739–1783.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tāng, Tíngchí 湯廷池
(
2000) Hànyǔ de “xiàndìng zǐjù” yǔ “fēixiàndìng zǐjù”.
漢語的“限定子句”與“非限定子句” [“Finite” and “non-finite” sentences in Chinese].
Yǔyán jì Yǔyánxué 語言暨語言學 11, 191–214.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
(
1990)
Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
(
2008)
Tense anchoring in Chinese.
Lingua, 1181, 675–686.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Niina
(
2016)
Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25/31, 275–311.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Sun, Yenan
2023.
Incompleteness and (not-)at-issue Updates in Mandarin Chinese. In
Dynamics in Logic and Language [
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13524],
► pp. 136 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.