Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.325–344

限定性和汉语主句

| Leiden University

本文通过对含有光杆动宾结构和体标记的汉语非自足句的考察，提出这些句子不合法的原因在于它们都是非限定句。在对非限定句做出的功能定义的基础上，本文指出事件句的时间理解需要三类抽象“时间”，即事件时间（Situation Time, SitT），声称/指称时间（Topic/Reference Time, TT），和说话时间（Utterance Time, UT）。在此基础上，我们进一步指出限定句的骨架的必有成分包括 CP, TP, AspP 和 VP（即 VP-e）。因此，本文讨论的句子之所以不合法，可以归因于骨架的不完整。同时，本文也检验了几种修补该类句子的手段，指出其目的多是加强了谓语的潜在的事件性，以满足限定事件句骨架的需要。由此，本文提出了一种分析汉语非自足句的新的理论框架。

Keywords: 限定句, 自足句, 完句成分, 时, 体
Article outline
  • 1.引言
  • 2.限定性
  • 3.自足句的骨架：第一步
  • 4.骨架：初步总结
  • 5.自足句的骨架：第二步
    • 5.1UT, TT, SitT
    • 5.2AspP, TP
  • 6.自足句的骨架：结论
  • 7.回到非自足句和它非限定的假设
  • 8.句末词的位置
  • 9.总结和结论
  • 致谢
  • 笔记
  • 參考文獻

Article language: Chinese

Published online: 14 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.19002.syb
References

參考文獻

Anderson, John M.
(1997) Finiteness and auxiliarihood. From runes to romance: A festschrift for Gunnar Perssón on his sixtieth birthday, ed. Mats Rydén, Henryk Kardela, Johan Nordlander and Bengt Odenstedt, Umeå: University of Umeå, 1–20.Google Scholar
Cáo, Dàogēn 曹道根
(2018) Zài lùn Hànyǔ shìfǒu yǒu xiàndìng hé fēixiàndìng qūfēn 再论汉语是否有限定和非限定区分 [Revisiting the finite vs. non-finite distinction in Chinese]. Dāngdài Yǔyánxué 当代语言学 20/11, 19–39.Google Scholar
Chu, Chauncey C.
(2009) Relevance and the discourse functions of Mandarin Utterance Final Particles. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/11, 282–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
(1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gù, Yáng 顾阳
(2008) Shí tài, shízhì lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ shíjiān cānzhào yánjiū 时态、时制理论与汉语时间参照研究 [Tense, tense theory and time reference in Chinese]. In Shěn Yáng 沈阳, Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.) Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū 当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 97–119. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline and Teun Hoekstra
(1995) The temporal interpretation of predication. Small clauses [ Syntax and semantics 28], ed. Anna Cardinaletti and Maria-Teresa Guasti, 77–107. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hé, Yáng 贺阳
(1994) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn chūtàn 汉语完句成分初探 [Exploring sentence-completing elements in Chinese]. Yǔyán Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū 语言教学与研究 41, 26–38.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, Nina Hyams and Misha Becker
(1999) The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar. Specifiers. Minimalist approaches, ed. David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Barbara Plunkett and George Tsoulas, 252–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan and Liejiong Xu
(2001) Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 391:1117–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hú, Jiànhuá 胡建华 and Shí Dìngxǔ 石定栩
(2005) Wánjù tiáojiàn yǔ zhǐchēng tèzhēng de yǔnzhǔn 完句条件与指称特征的允准 [Conditions on sentence completion and the licensing of referential features]. Yǔyán Kēxué 语言科学 4/51, 42–49.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
(1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, Nick
(2018) Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27/41, 347–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jīn, Tíngēn 金廷恩
(1999) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn shuōlüè 汉语完句成分说略 [Brief discussion of sentence completing elements in Chinese]. Hànyǔ Xuéxí 汉语学习 61, 8–13.Google Scholar
Jìng, Chéng 竟成
(1996) Hànyǔ de chéngjù guòchéng hé shíjiān gàiniàn de biǎodá 汉语的成句过程和时间概念的表达 [The process of building sentences in Chinese and the expression of the concept of time]. Yǔwén Yánjiū 语文研究 11, 1–5.Google Scholar
Katz, Graham
(1995) Stativity, genericity and temporal reference, Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
(2003) Event arguments, adverb selection and the Stative Adverb Gap. Modifying Adjuncts ed. Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 455–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
(1994) Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kǒng, Lìngdá 孔令达
(1994) Yǐngxiǎng Hànyǔ jùzi zìzú de yǔyán xíngshì 影响汉语句子自足的语言形式 [Language forms influencing the self-sufficiency of Chinese sentences]. Zhōngguó Yǔwén 中国语文 61, 434–440.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
(1998) More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, ed. Devron Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications/Cornell University, 92–109.Google Scholar
Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson
(1981) Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. Audrey
(1990) Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang
(2003) Selectional restrictions of tenses and temporal reference of Chinese bare sentences. Lingua 113/31, 271–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
(2011) Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax, 141, 48–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 481, 151–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa
(2002) An underspecified Tense in St’át’imcets. Paper presented at WECOL 2002.
Nikolaeva, Irina
(2013) Unpacking finiteness. Canonical morphology and syntax, ed. Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina and Greville Corbett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–122.Google Scholar
ed. (2007) Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
(1947) Elements of symbolic logic, Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery, Elements of Grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sīmǎ, Líng 司马翎 [Rint Sybesma] and Hsieh Feng-fan 谢峰凡
(2008) Shēngchéng yǔfǎ lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ yǔqìcí yánjiū 生成语法理论与汉语语气词研究 [Generative grammatical theory and the research into Chinese modal particles]. In Shěn Yáng 沈阳, Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.) Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū 当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 364–374. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongyuan
(2014) Temporal Construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Universities of Leiden and Nantes. [[URL]].
Sybesma, Rint
(2007) Whether we Tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry, 381, 580–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Finiteness. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, ed. Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers, Leiden: Brill, Vol II1, 233–237.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint and Li Boya
(2007) The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117/101, 1739–1783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tāng, Tíngchí 湯廷池
(2000) Hànyǔ de “xiàndìng zǐjù” yǔ “fēixiàndìng zǐjù”. 漢語的“限定子句”與“非限定子句” [“Finite” and “non-finite” sentences in Chinese]. Yǔyán jì Yǔyánxué 語言暨語言學 11, 191–214.Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
(1990) Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
(2008) Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua, 1181, 675–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina
(2016) Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25/31, 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Huang, C.-T. James
2022. Finiteness, opacity, and Chinese clausal architecture. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.