Article published in:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 7:1 (2020) ► pp. 7189
References

References

Aoun, J.
(1985) A Grammar of Anaphora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aoun, J. & Y.-H. A. Li
(1993) Syntax of Scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beaver, D., Francez, I. & Levinso, D.
(2005) Bad subject: (Non-)canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In E. Georgala & J. Howell (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 151 (pp. 19–43). Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Beghelli, F. & Stowell, T.
(1994) The direction of quantifier movement. GLOW Newsletter (32):56–57.Google Scholar
(1997) Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every. In A. Szabolcsi (Ed.), Ways of Scope Taking (pp. 71–108). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D.
(2013) Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance there-sentences. Language, 89(4): 675–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cann, R., & Wu, Y.
(2011) The Bei construction in Chinese. In R. Kempson, E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (Eds.), The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces (pp. 339–380). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.-R.
(1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, H.
(1986) Formal and colloquial adversity passives in standard Chinese. Linguistics (24), 1025–1052.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1978) Definiteness and Referentiality, In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4 (pp. 291–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, J.
(1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond., E. A. Moravcsik., & J. Wirth. (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology (pp. 209–249). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I.
(1982) The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hellan, L.
(1981) On semantic scope. In F. Heny (Ed.), Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J.
(1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Huang, J. C.-T., Li, A. Y.-H., & Li, Y.
(2009) The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. C-T., & Liu, N.
(2014) Xinxing Feidianxing Beidongshi “Bei XX” de Jufa yu Yuyi Jiegou (The syntax and semantics of the new non-canonical bei XX construction). Yuyan Kexue (Linguistic Sciences) (5): 225–241.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L.
(2003) The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics? Natural Language Semantics, 11(2): 187–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinyalolo, K.
(1990) Syntactic Dependencies and the Spec-Head Agreement Hypothesis in KiLega. Ph.D. diss, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H.
(2011) Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H.
(1986) Studies on Quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H., Yip, V., & Wang, C.
(1999) Rethinking isomorphism as a scope principle for Chinese and English. Proceedings of the Tenth North American Chinese Linguistics Conference (pp. 169–186). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
(1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 457–498). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Löbner, S.
(1985) Definites. Journal of Semantics 41: 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, R.
(1977) The Grammar of Quantification. Ph. D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1985) Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F.
(1992) The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status. In S. A. Thompson and W. C. Mann (Eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund Raising (pp. 295–325). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C.
(2003) Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 261: 287–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strawson, P.
(1964) Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 301: 96–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
(1994) Quantifiers in pair-list readings and the non-uniformity of quantification. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), (pp. 646–664). Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(1997) Strategies for scope taking. In A. Szabolcsi. (Ed.), (pp. 109–154). Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.
(1989/2006) Hanyu Yufashi (History of Chinese Grammar). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Wu, Yaqing
(2000) Yinghanyu liangci xiayu de qiyi yanjiu zongshu (Review of the ambiguity of classifiers’ scope in English and Chinese). Dangdai Yuyanxue (Contemporary Linguistics) 21: 168–182.Google Scholar
Wu, Yicheng
(2011) Towards a dynamic typology of passives. In R. Kempson., E. Gregoromichelaki & C. Howes (Eds.), (pp. 131–162). The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wu, Y.
(2013) On the so-called unbounded passives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 411: 65–90.Google Scholar
Xu, L., & Lee, T. H.
(1989) Scope ambiguity and disambiguity in Chinese. In C. Wiltshire., R. Graczyk & B. Music (Eds.), (pp. 451–466). CLS 251. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Yang, X., & Wang, T.
(2019) Guanlian Shiyuxia de “Bei XX” Jiegou (A relevance-theoretic account of “Bei-XX” construction). Waiguo Yuwen (Foreign Language and Literature) 35(3): 103–110.Google Scholar