Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 8:2 (2021) ► pp.204–240

On the conditional marker “zhě”(者)

The interaction of nominalization, topicality, and conditionality

| Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

This paper aims to explain the development of “zhě” serving as a conditional marker mainly in Late Archaic Chinese and to show that the conditional marker “zhě” derives from the nominalizer “zhě”. The grammaticalization of “zhě” is at the level of pragmatic inference, which shows an interaction of nominalization, topicality, and conditionality. Nominalization directly makes the original clause lose its ability to confirm the factuality of the event, and the nominalized construction then is endowed with a generic meaning, which is in some way related to conditionals. Specifically, the contexts triggering this grammaticalization can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the construction “VP/clause + zhě” always occupies the topic position; secondly, VPs/clauses in that construction always represent a kind of non-factual event, which means that the semantic feature of the VPs/clauses is non-factual or unreal. Furthermore, there are two clues, namely modal auxiliary and negator, which can help identify the non-factual event.

Keywords: conditional, nominalization, topic, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The multifunctional zhě
    • 2.1Nominalization
      • 2.1.1Agent nominalizer
      • 2.1.2Common nominalizer
      • 2.1.3Two hierarchies related to nominalization
    • 2.2Topicality
    • 2.3Conditionality
  • 3.The grammaticalization of zhě
    • 3.1Non-factual meaning
    • 3.2The bridging context – the interaction of nominalization, topic structure and conditionality
    • 3.3The conventionalization stage
    • 3.4Other data for supporting this analysis
    • 3.5Similar phenomena from Modern Sinitic Languages
  • 4.Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.19022.li
References (60)
Aldridge, E.
(2009) The Old Chinese Determiner zhe. In Crisma, P. & Longobardi, G. (Eds.). Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory (pp. 233–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Object relative clause in Archaic Chinese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 239–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., & Vinokurova, N.
(2009) On Agent Nominalizations and Why They Are Not like Event Nominalizations. Language, 851, 517–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W.
(2014) On the strength of morphological paradigms – a historical account of radical pro-drop”. In Robbeets, M. and Bisang, W. (Eds.). Paradigm Change in Historical Reconstruction: The Transeurasian Languages and Beyond (pp. 23–60). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure. In Chamoreau, C. & Estrada-Fernández, Z. (Eds.). Finiteness and Nominalization (pp. 13–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, D. & Thompson, S.
(1985) Lexical nominalizations. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III1. 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, G.
(2009) Nominalization and the origin of subordination. In Talmy Givon & Masayoshi Shibatani. (Eds). Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution (pp. 199–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
(1999) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. Paper presented at the symposium on “New Reflections on Grammaticalization,” Potsdam, 17–19 June, 1999.
Dobson, W.
(1959) Late Archaic Chinese, A Grammatical Study. Toronto: University of Toronto. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, X.
(2004) Cong huati jiegou dao fuju jiegou: yi “zhe” he “suo” de gongneng yanbian wei li [Derivation of conditional markers from topical contexts: the case study of zhe and suo], in Takashima, K. & Jiang, S. (Eds.). Meaning and Form: Essays in Pre-Modern Chinese Grammar (pp. 291–304). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Eans, N. & Wilkins, D.
(1998) The knowing ear: An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition. (Arbeitspapier 32, NF.) Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1990) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) English grammar: a function-based introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, B.
(2017) Shanggu hanyu jiasheju yanjiu [A Study on Hypothetical Sentences in Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1967) Logic and conversation [The William James lectures]. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1978) Conditionals are topics. Language 54(3), 564–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbsmeier, C.
(1981) Aspects of Classical Chinese Syntax. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer, Ilse & Gabriele Diewald. (Eds.). New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, L.
(2004) Zuozhuan Xuci Yanjiu [Functional Categories in the Zuozhuan]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S.
(1984) The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Lauguage, 60(4), 703–752.Google Scholar
Huang, C.
(1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 151, 531–574.Google Scholar
Ida, M.
(2012) Yueyu de tiaojian fenju biaoji “ge” [The conditional marker ge in Cantonese]. Studies of Chinese languages, 51, 458–468.Google Scholar
Jiang, L.
(2002) Shijianci shi he hou de yufahua. [The grammaticalization of temporal words Shi and Hou]. Studies of Chinese languages, 41, 291–301.Google Scholar
Jiang, L., Xia, C., Zhao, K. and Guo, W.
(1998) Xianqin shi jianshang cidian [A dictionary of pre-Qin poetry appreciation]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Kabak, B., & Schiering, R.
(2004) A corpus study on the distribution of Turkish ise and its clitic form. Turkic Languages, 81, 232–244.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. London & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1997) Generics and Habituals. In Athanasiadu, A. & René, D. (Eds.). On Conditionals Again (pp. 191–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1988) Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. In Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (pp.181–225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S.
(1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language, in Li, C. N. (Ed.) Subject and Topic (pp. 457–90). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Q.
(2017) Shanggu hanyu “zhuzhiwei” jiegou de huatixing ji qi xiangguan wenti [The Topicality of “Subject+zhī (之)+Predicate” Structure in Ancient Chinese and Relevant Issues]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language, 21, 62–74.Google Scholar
Liu, D.
(2004) Huati biaoji cong he er lai? [Where is the Topic Maker From? – The Universality and Peculiarity in Grammaticalization] (pp. 6–15). In Shi, F. and Shen, Z. (Eds.). Joy of Research – A Festschrift in honor of professor William S-Y Wang on his seventieth birthday. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.Google Scholar
(2019a) “Ruguo” de 31 zhong (huo 68 zhong) duiying xingshi – Wujiang tongli hua de tiaojian biaoji [31 (or 86) Counterparts of If: The Rich Inventory of Conditional Markers in the Wujiang (Tongli) Dialect of Wu Chinese]. Fangyan [Dialect], 11, 6–17.Google Scholar
(2019b) Wujiang Tongli hua de tiaojian biaoji zhe ji qi laiyuan lice [The conditional marker tsØ52 in the Wujiang Tongli dialect of Wu Chinese and its historical source]. Yuyan yanjiu jikan [Bulletin of Linguistic Studies], 241, 163–177.Google Scholar
Lü, S.
(1982 [1942/1944]) Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [The Outline of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Malchukov, A.
(2004) Nominalization, Verbalization: Constraining a Typology of Transcategorial Operations. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
(2006) Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics, 441, 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mei, G.
(2015) Shanggu hanyu yuga gangyao [Outline of Archaic Chinese Grammar]. Taipei: Sanmin Shuju.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A.
(1997) On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 26(1), 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G.
(1995) Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
(2019) What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. In Zariquiey, et al. (Eds.), Nominalization in Languages of the Americas (pp. 15–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, H.
(2015) Shanggu hanyu “zhe” de suowei zizhi biaoji gongneng zai yi [Revisiting the grammatical functions of the so-call ed “self-reference marker” zhe in ancient Chinese]. Studies of Chinese languages, 21, 133–140.Google Scholar
Traugott, E., Meulen, A., Reilly, J. and Ferguson, C.
(1986) On Conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.
(1958) Hanyu shigao [A Historical Introduction to Chinese]. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
(1998 [1962]) Gudai hanyu [Ancient Chinese]. Beijing：Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Fang, Y.
(1992) Zhonggu hanyu yuci li shi [An Interpretation of Medieval Chinese Words]. Jilin: Jilin Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wu, H. & Shen, J.
(2017) Guhanyu “zhe”: zizhi he zhuanzhi ruhe tongyi [How to unify the usages of zhe(者) in Pre-Qin Chinese]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 31, 277–289.Google Scholar
Xing, X.
(2005) Shenbei jinyu yanhe fangyan yuanwanglei xuni yuqi de biaoda shouduan [The Subjective Mood of Wish in the Seven Counties along the Yellow River in North Shaanxi Belonging to Jin Dialect]. Linguistic Research, 21, 44–48.Google Scholar
Xu, L., & Liu, D.
(1998) Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [The Structure and Functions of Topics]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yang, B., & He, L.
(1992) Gu hanyu yufa ji qi fazhan [Ancient Chinese Grammar and Its Development]. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yap, F., & Matthews, S.
(2008) The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In López-Couso, M., & Seoane, E. (Eds.). Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives (pp. 309–341). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, F., & Wang, J.
(2011) From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of “zhe” and “suo” in Old and Middle Chinese. In Yap, F., Grunow-Hårsta, K., and Wrona, J. (Eds.). Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives (pp. 61–108). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Y.
(1997) Zhe de yufa gongneng ji qi lishi yanbian [On zhe’s grammatical function and its historical development]. Social Sciences in China, 31, 160–178.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.
(2004) Xizhou hanyu yufa yanjiu [Study on the grammar of Western Zhou Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
(2016) Chutu xianqin wenxian xuci fazhan yanjiu [A Study of the development of the function word in the pre-Qin documents unearthed]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, F.
(1961) Zhongguo gudai yufa [A historical grammar of Ancient Chinese], Part I: Syntax. Taipei: The institute of history and philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
(1990 [1972]) Zhongguo gudai yufa [A historical grammar of Ancient Chinese], Part III: Substitution. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Zhu, D.
(1983) Zizhi he zhuanzhi: Hanyu mingcihua biaoji “de, zhe, suo, zhi” de yufa gongneng he yuyi gongneng [Self-referring and other-referring expressions]. Fangyan [Dialect], 11, 16–31.Google Scholar
Zürcher, E.
(1977) Late Han vernacular elements in the earliest Buddhist translations. Journal of the Chinese language Teachers Association, 12(3), 177–203.Google Scholar