The partitive construction in Mandarin Chinese
Jing Jin | The Hong Kong Institute of Education
This paper investigates the semantic and syntactic properties of [N(oun)+de+Q(uantifier)] in Mandarin Chinese. Based on a comparison with the quantitive construction [Q+N], the paper advocates that [N+de+Q] is the Chinese partitive construction. Adopting a clausal approach to the syntactic derivation of partitives, it is hypothesized that Chinese partitives are formed via applying Predicate Inversion to a small clause that features a BELONG-type possession relationship. The difference between Chinese partitives and English-type partitives in terms of the surface word order is a result of a parametric variation with respect to whether the remnant of Predication Inversion undergoes further raising or not.
References (76)
Abbott, B
(
1996)
Doing without a partitive constraint. In
J. Hoeksema (Ed.),
Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions (pp. 25–56). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M
(
2007)
Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, C.L
(
1995)
English syntax (2nd edition). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barker, C
(
1998)
Partitives, double genitives and anti-uniqueness.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16(4), 679–717.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bašić, M
(
2004)
Nominal subextractions and the structure of NPs in Serbian and English. MA thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, H., Corver, N., & Den Dikken, M
(
1998)
Predication in nominal phrases.
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics,1(2), 85–117.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, H
(
2005)
In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G
(
1992)
Partitive ‘ne’ and the QP-Hypothesis: A case study. In
E. Fava &
G. Francescato (Eds.),
Proceedings of the XVII Meeting of Generative Grammar: Trieste, February 22-24 1991 (pp. 121–141). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G
(
2006)
The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. In
M. Everaert &
H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.),
The Blackwell companion to syntax Chapter 71, (pp. 3–93). Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L.-S.L., & Sybesma, R
(
1998)
Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers.
Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L.-S.L., & Sybesma, R
(
1999)
Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.
Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G
(
1997)
Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation. In
A. Lawson (Ed.),
Proceedings of SALT VII (pp. 73–98). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G
(
1998a)
Reference to kinds across language.
Natural Language Semantics,6(4), 339–405.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G
(
1998b)
Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In
S. Rothstein (Ed.),
Events and grammar (pp. 53–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G
(
2005) “
Definites, locality, and intentional identity.” In
G.N. Carlson &
F.J. Pelletier (Eds.),
Reference and quantification: The partee effect (pp. 143–177). Stanford: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
1982)
Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
2000)
Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
R. Martin,
D. Michaels, &
J. Uriagereka (Eds.),
Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
2001)
Derivation by phase. In
M. Kenstowicz (Ed.),
Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corver, N
(
2004)
Some notes on emphatic forms and displacement in Dutch. In
A. Breibarth &
H.C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.),
Triggers (pp. 137–172). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Hoop, H
1997 A semantic reanalysis of the partitive constraint.
Lingua, 103(2), 151–174.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Hoop, H
2003 Partitivity. In
L.-S.L. Cheng &
R. Sybesma (Eds.),
The second glot international state-of-the-article book: The latest in linguistics (pp. 179–212). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Swart, H
(
1992)
Intervention effects, monotonicity and scope. In
C. Barker &
D. Dowty (Eds.),
Proceedings of SALT, Vol. 21, (pp. 387–406). Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
den Dikken, M
(
2006)
Relators and linkers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
den Dikken, M
(
2007)
Amharic relatives and possessives: Definiteness, agreement, and the linker.
Linguistic Inquiry 38(2), 302–320.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
den Dikken, M., & Singhapreecha, P
(
2004)
Complex noun phrases and linkers.
Syntax, 7(1), 1–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diesing, M
(
1992)
Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M., & Giusti, G
Doetjes, J.S
(
1997)
Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D
(
1991)
Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.
Language, 67(3), 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enç, M
(
1991)
The semantics of specificity.
Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 1–25.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeze, R
(
1992)
Existentials and other locatives.
Language, 68(3), 553–595.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L
(
2010)
The syntax of wek (‘which’) and zuk (‘such’) in West Flemish.
Lingua, 120(4), 850–863.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoeksema, J
(
1996)
Introduction. In
J. Hoeksema (Ed.),
Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions (pp. 1–24). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hsieh, M.-L
(
2008)
The internal structure of noun phrases in Chinese. Taipei: Crane.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J
(
1982)
Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulk, A., & Tellier, C
(
2000)
Mismatches: Agreement in qualitative constructions.
Probus, 12(1), 33–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R
(
1977)
X-bar syntax: A theory of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R
(
1991)
Parts and boundaries.
Cognition, 41(1), 9–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jin, J
(
2013)
Functions of Chinese classifiers: A syntax-semantics interface account. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, R.S
(
1994)
The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, E.L., & Stavi, J
(
1986)
A semantic characterization of natural language determiners.
Linguistics and Philosophy 9(3), 253–326.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, J.-B
(
2002)
On the structure of English partitive NPs and agreement.
Studies in Generative Grammar, 121, 309–338.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, M
(
1998)
The origins of telicity. In
S. Rothstein (Ed.),
Events and grammar (pp. 197–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kupferman, L
(
1999)
Réflexions sur la partition: Les groupes nominaux partitifs et la relativisation.
Langue française, 1221, 30–51.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ladusaw, W
(
1982)
Semantic constraints on the English partitive construction. In
D.P. Flickinger,
M. Macken, &
N. Wiegand (Eds.),
Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 1 (pp. 231–242). Calif.: Stanford University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R.W
(
2008)
Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, X
(
2011)
On the semantics of classifiers in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Link, G
(
1983)
The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In
R. Bäuerle,
C. Schwarze, &
A. von Stechow (Eds.),
Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, G
(
1994)
Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form.
Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4), 609–665.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, C
(
1999)
Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martí i Girbau, N
(
2010)
The syntax of partitives. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milner, J.C
(
1978)
De la Syntaxe à l’interprétation: Quantités, Insultes, Exclamations. Paris: Seuil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Picallo, M.C
(
1994)
Catalan possessive pronouns: The Avoid Pronoun Principle revisited.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 259–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, A
(
1989)
Discourse groups and semantic groups. In
J. Powers &
K. de Jong (Ed.),
Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (pp. 416–427). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, A
(
1996)
Partitives, existentials, and partitive determiners. In
J. Hoeksema (Ed.),
Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions (pp. 143–178). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rijkhoff, J
(
2009)
On the co-variation between form and function of adnominal possessive modifiers in Dutch and English. In
W.B. McGregor (Ed.),
The expression of possession (pp. 51–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L
(
1990)
Relativized minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, J.R
(
1967)
Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, E
(
1977)
Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In
P.W. Culicover,
T. Wasow, &
A. Akmajian (Eds.),
Formal syntax (pp. 285–316). London: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, A
(
2001)
Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP.
Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 125–156.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, A
(
2002)
On the status of ‘modifying’ de and the structure of the Chinese DP. In
S.-W. Tang &
C. Liu (Eds.),
On the formal way to Chinese languages (pp. 74–101). Stanford: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sio, J.U
(
2006)
Modification and reference in the Chinese nominal. Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sleeman, P
(
2002)
Restrictive dependencies and Antisymmetry theory.
Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 271, 123–137.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sleeman, P., & Kester, E.-P
(
2002)
Partitive Constructions and Antisymmetry. In
C. Beyssade,
R. Bok-Bennema,
F. Drijkoningen, &
P. Monachesi (Eds.),
Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000 (pp. 271–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stickney, H
(
2009)
The emergence of DP in the partitive structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, W.-T.D
(
2003)
Three types of existential quantification in Chinese. In
Y.A. Li &
A. Simpson (Eds.),
Functional structure(s), form and interpretation: Perspectives from East Asian languages (pp. 161–179). London: Routledge-Curzon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, W.-T.D
(
2004)
Tan ‘you ren’, ‘you de ren’ he ‘you xie ren’ [On you ren, you de ren and you xie ren].
Hanyu Xuebao [
Chinese Linguistics], 21, 16–25.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verkuyl, H.J
(
1993)
A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vos, R
(
1999)
A grammar of partitive constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, R
(
2001)
Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, The State University of New Jersey.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, N
(
2006)
Representing specificity by the internal order of indefinites.
Linguistics 44(1), 1–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamparelli, R
(
2000)
Layers in the determiner phrase. New York: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Lyutikova, Ekaterina
2023.
Person Agreement with Anaphors: Evidence from Tatar.
Languages 8:1
► pp. 46 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Li, Haoze
2022.
Relative measurement and scope in Mandarin.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jin, Jing
2017.
The Syntax of the Abstract-type Measurement Construction in Mandarin Chinese.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38:1
► pp. 35 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.