Vol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.44–75
Wh-adjuncts in Chinese refutatory wh-sentences
The present study focuses on the refutatory wh-sentences in Chinese. The main idea is two-fold. First, contrary to the previous accounts arguing for the interrogative nature of refutatory sentences, we argue that refutatory wh-sentences exclude the interrogative force and should be distinguished from rhetorical questions accordingly. Second, we will show that all wh-words bearing the refutatory interpretation should occur as adjuncts, which are syntactically placed in the left periphery. Two subtypes of refutatory wh-adjuncts, namely, propositional refutatory wh-adjuncts and modal refutatory wh-adjuncts, are further classified in this study. The former is semantically akin to the pure negator bu, while the latter semantically relates to modality.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies towards refutatory wh-sentences
- 2.1Interrogative approach
- 2.2Non-interrogative approach
- 2.3Distribution of refutatory wh-phrases
- 3.Refutatory wh-sentences vs. interrogative
wh-questions
- 3.1Against the interrogative approach
- 3.2Further evidence in support of the non-interrogative approach
- 3.3Rhetorical questions are interrogative
- 3.4Distinguishing refutatory wh-sentences from rhetorical questions
- 4.Syntactic properties of refutatory wh-sentences
- 4.1
Wh-arguments vs. wh-adjuncts
- 4.1.1Pure wh-arguments
- 4.1.2Semi wh-arguments/wh-adjuncts
- 4.1.3Pure wh-adjuncts
- 4.2Two types of refutatory wh-adjuncts
- 4.2.1A cartographic mapping of modality and negation
- 4.2.2Propositional refutatory wh-adjuncts
- 4.2.3Modal refutatory wh-adjuncts
- 4.2.4The syntactic position of refutatory wh-adjuncts
- 4.1
Wh-arguments vs. wh-adjuncts
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.22005.yin