Aspectual coercion
Interpretations of V-le in Mandarin Chinese
Wendan Li | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Dynamic verbs followed by the perfective aspect morpheme -le (V-le) in Chinese typically designate bounded events but can also encode states. This article proposes that the eventive designations are at the basic level and the stative interpretations are at the derived level through aspectual coercion. The categorical shifts from the former to the latter may be brought about by a number of factors, which include sentences with nonagent subject/topic, general stative sentences, and certain adverbs. These factors introduce aspectual properties incompatible with V-le's basic-level eventive interpretation. They trigger a coercion procedure to reconcile the incompatibilities, leading to aspectual reinterpretations. These findings are discussed in light of the principle of external override and the analytic nature of the Chinese language.
Keywords: aspect, coercion, interpretation, situation types, Chinese
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Aspectual coercion
- 2.2The verbal -le and perfectivity in Chinese
- 2.2.1The viewpoint marker -le
- 2.2.2Perfectivity conveyed by information from situation aspect
- 2.3Types of situation entities: Situations and general statives
- 3.Coercion of V-le in Chinese
- 3.1Coercion of V-le triggered by nonagent subject/topic
- 3.1.1The existential construction
- 3.1.2Passive constructions
- 3.1.3Sentences with preposed patient
- 3.1.4Double-nominative constructions
- 3.2Coercion of V-le in general stative sentences
- 3.3Coercion of V-le by the adverb yijing ‘already’
- 3.1Coercion of V-le triggered by nonagent subject/topic
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1The role of external argument in aspectual interpretation
- 4.2Aspectual designations and event complex
- 4.3Word order
- 4.4The role of context
- 4.5Issues for further study
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
Published online: 04 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.4.1.02li
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.4.1.02li
References
Asher, Nicholas, & Hunter, Julie
Brennan, Jonathan, & Pylkkänen, Liina
Cheng, Lisa, & Huang, James C.-T.
Comrie, Bernard
Fleischman, Suzanne
Friedrich, Paul
Fuhs, Stefan
Givón, Talmy
Gu, Yang
Hopper, Paul
Hopper, Paul J., & Thompson, Sandra A.
Jespersen, Otto
Jones, Larry B., & Jones, Linda K.
Krifka, Manfred; Pelletier, Francis Jeffry; Carlson, Gregory N.; Meulen, Alice ter; Chierchia, Gennaro, & Link, Godehard
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A.
Li, Wendan
Lin, Jo-Wang
Liu, Xunning
Lu, John H. T.
Michaelis, Laura A.
Moens, Marc
Moens, Marc, & Steedman, Mark
Nie, Wenlong
Packard, Jerome L.
Pan, Haihua
Piñango, Maria Mercedes; Winnick, Aaron; Ullah, Rashad, & Zurif, Edgar
Pustejovsky, James, & Bouillon, Pierrette
Reinhart, Tanya
Ross, Claudia
Shi, Yuzhi
Shi, Ziqiang
Song, Yuzhu
Swart, Henriëtte de
Tai, James H.-Y.
Tai, James H.-Y., & Chou, Jane Y.
Teng, Shouxin
Thompson, Sandra A.
Townsend, David J.
Tsao, Fengfu
Verkuyl, Henk J.
Verkuyl, Henk
Wald, Benji
Xiao, Richard, & McEnery, Tony
Xiao, Richard; McEnery, Tony, & Qian, Yufang