Article published in:
Constructions in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Susan Hunston and Florent Perek
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3] 2019
► pp. 268290
References

References

Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A., & Meurers, D.
(2015) Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1 (1), 96–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, L. G.
(1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15 (3), 147–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 289 ]
Altenberg, B., & Granger, S.
(2001) The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22 (2), 173–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.
(2015) A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 478–510). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anthony, L.
(2014a) AntConc (Version 3.4.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software (last accessed July 2019).
(2014b) TagAnt (Version 1.1.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software (last accessed July 2019).
Barlow, M.
(2015) Collocate (Version 2.0) [Computer Software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Behrens, H.
(2009) Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47 (2), 383–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D., & Manning, C. D.
(2014) A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 740–750). Retrieved from https://​cs​.stanford​.edu​/~danqi​/papers​/emnlp2014​.pdf (last accessed April 2019). Crossref
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/ (last accessed April 2019).
de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D.
(2008) Stanford typed dependencies manual (revised for the Stanford Parser v. 3.5.2 in April 2015). Retrieved from https://​nlp​.stanford​.edu​/software​/dependencies​_manual​.pdf (last accessed April 2019).
Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
(2012) The use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admissions examination. Revista de Educación, 357 , 55–79.Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M., & Altenberg, B.
(1994) Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus. In U. Fries, G. Tottie, & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp. 63–77). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
(2009) Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (Special section), 111–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 , 188–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 290 ]
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2009) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 558–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2014) Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns (pp. 71–97). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U.
(2013) Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63 (Supp. 1), 25–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
(2016) Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W.
(2009) Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 335–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62 (2), 335–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T.
(2007) Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & Niemi, S. (Eds.). Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes (pp. 86–99). Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P.
(2015) On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 207–232). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L.
(Eds.) (1983) Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., & A. Korhonen
(2013) Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). In Selected Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) (pp. 240–254). Carnegie Mellon University: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 , 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (3), 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Ellis, N. C.
(2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65 (S1), 228–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., & P. Buttery
(2010) Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1 (1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 291 ]
Jarvis, S.
(2011) Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (Special Issue), 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com​/doi​/10​.1002​/9781405198431​.wbeal0291​/full (last accessed April 2019).
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
(2008) Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Kapur, J. N.
(1986) Normalized measures of entropy. International Journal of General Systems, 12 (1), 55–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K.
(2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
(2017) Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, 34 (4), 513–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T.
(2014) Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (2), 612–628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G.
(1997) Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24 (1), 187–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, A.
(2013) L1 Influence and Individual Variation in the L2 Accuracy Development of Grammatical Morphemes: Insights from Learner Corpora (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
(2005) Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A.
(1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26 (3), 619–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nisioi, S.
(2015) Feature analysis for native language identification. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015 (pp. 644–657). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E.
(2010) Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37 (3), 607–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Römer, U., & Garner, J. R.
forthcoming). The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English: Tracing effects of usage and proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 292 ]
Tomasello, M.
(1992) First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tono, Y., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
(2014) Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19 (2), 163–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T.
(Eds.) (2013) Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L.
(2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Tyler, A. E., L. Ortega, M. Uno & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Liu, Yingying & Xiaofei Lu
2020. N1 of N2 constructions in academic written discourse: A pattern grammar analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47  pp. 100893 ff. Crossref logo
O'Keeffe, Anne
2020. Data-driven learning – a call for a broader research gaze. Language Teaching  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.